Qualitative research methods are used within special education research to provide insights about how and why phenomena occur. They can, however, be misunderstood and applied inappropriately. Our aim in this article is to provide an overview of qualitative methods, including their purpose, contributions to research involving students with learning disabilities, limitations, and quality indicators for methodological rigor. Additionally, we highlight common qualitative methods and data sources. We review a recent study that exemplifies the use of qualitative methods in the field. Our take–home message is that qualitative methods can provide valuable in–depth information about how and why phenomena occur, but they are not intended to support causal relationships or large–scale generalizability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnnammaS. A. (2014). Disabling juvenile justice: Engaging the stories of incarcerated young women of color with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514526785
2.
BenedictA. E., BrownellM., BettiniE., & SohnH. (2021). Learning together: Teachers’ evolving understanding of coordinated word study instruction within an RTI framework. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(2), 134–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420930686
3.
BrantlingerE., JimenezR., KlingnerJ. K., PugachM., & RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
4.
BrinkmannS. (2013). Qualitative interviewing. Oxford University Press.
5.
BrownellM. T., LauterbachA., DingleM., BoardmanA., UrbachJ., LekoM. M., BenedictA., & ParkY. (2014). Individual and contextual factors influencing special education teacher learning in literacy learning cohorts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713487179
6.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st Century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. E. (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd edn., pp. 507–535). Sage.
CourduffJ., & MoktariA. (2021). Personal, cultural, and institutional perspectives of special education technology integrators: A narrative inquiry. Journal of Special Education Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211019393
9.
CreswellJ. W., & PothC. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
10.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
11.
GearinB., PetscherY., StanleyC., NelsonN. J., & FienH. (2021). Document analysis of state dyslexia legislation suggests likely heterogeneous effects on student and school outcomes. Learning Disability Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948721991549
12.
GlaserB., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.
13.
GrbichC. (2007). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
14.
GuestG., NameyE. E., & MitchellM. L. (2013). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. Sage.
15.
HarryB., & KlingnerJ. (2014). Why are so many minority students in special education?. Teachers College Press.
16.
HarryB., KlingnerJ. K., & HartJ. (2005). African American families under fire: Ethnographic views of family strengths. Remedial and Special Education, 26(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260020501
17.
HooverJ. J., EricksonJ. R., PattonJ. R., SaccoD. M., & TranL. M. (2019). Examining IEPs of English learners with learning disabilities for cultural and linguistic responsiveness. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12183
18.
King ThoriusK. A., MaxcyB. D., MaceyE., & CoxA. (2014). A critical practice analysis of response to intervention appropriation in an urban school. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514522100
19.
Koro–LjungbergM., Yendol–HoppeyD., SmithJ. J., & HayesS. B. (2009). (E) pistemological awareness, instantiation of methods, and uninformed methodological ambiguity in qualitative research projects. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x09351980
20.
KozleskiE. B. (2017). The uses of qualitative research: Powerful methods to inform evidence–based practice in education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916683710
21.
LauterbachA. A., BrownellM. T., & BettiniE. A. (2020). Expert secondary content–area teachers’ pedagogical schemas for teaching literacy to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(4), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948719864417
22.
LeCompteM. D., & SchensulJ. J. (1999). Designing and conducting ethnographic research. Rowman Altamira.
23.
LekoM. M. (2014). The value of qualitative methods in social validity research. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514524002
24.
LekoM. M., & BrownellM. T. (2011). Special education preservice teachers’ appropriation of pedagogical tools for teaching reading. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107700205
25.
LekoM. M., RobertsC. A., & PekY. (2015). A theory of secondary teachers’ adaptations when implementing a reading intervention program. The Journal of Special Education, 49(3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466914546751
26.
LimS., & CheathamG. A. (2020). A Sociocognitive discourse analysis of monolingual ideology and bias in special education partnerships. Remedial and Special Education, 42(5), 340–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520930340
27.
McDuffieK. A., & ScruggsT. E. (2008). The contributions of qualitative research to discussions of evidence–based practice in special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208321564
28.
McGrathA. L., & HughesM. T. (2018). Students with learning disabilities in inquiry–based science classrooms: A cross–case analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717736007
29.
MerriamS. B., & TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
30.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
31.
OroscoM. J., & AbdulrahimN. A. (2017). Culturally responsive evidence–based practices with English language learners with learning disabilities: A qualitative case study. Educational Borderlands, 1, 27–45.
32.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd edn.). Sage.
33.
PugachM. C. (2001). The stories we choose to tell: Fulfilling the promise of qualitative research for special education. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518806045
34.
RiessmanC. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
35.
RupparA. L., KnightV. F., McQuestonJ. A., & JeglumS. R. (2020). Involvement and progress in the general curriculum: A grounded theory of the process. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518806045
36.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
37.
ScottL. A., BrownA., WallaceW., CormierC. J., & PowellC. (2020). If we're not doing it, then who? A qualitative study of Black special educators’ persistence. Exceptionality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1850453
38.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
39.
StraussA. L., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
40.
TrainorA. A. (2005). Self–determination perceptions and behaviors of diverse students with LD during the transition planning process. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380030501
41.
TrainorA. A., & GraueE. (2014). Evaluating rigor in qualitative methodology and research dissemination. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528100
42.
WolcottH. F. (2008). Writing up qualitative research. Sage.
43.
YinR. (2003). Case study research design and methods. Sage.
