The Effect of Learning and Integration Investment on Manufacturing Outsourcing Decisions: A Game Theoretic Approach

Abstract

We introduce a two‐period Stackelberg game of a supplier and buyer. We recognize that learning from manufacturing experience has many advantages. Consistent with the literature, we assume both the buyer and supplier realize reductions in their respective production costs in period 2 due to volume‐based learning from period 1 production. In addition, we introduce another learning concept, the future value, to capture the buyer's benefits of transferring current manufacturing experience for the design and development of future products and technologies. In contrast to the literature, we allow the supplier two mechanisms to impact the buyer's outsourcing decision: price and the investment in integration process improvement (IPI) that reduces the buyer's unit cost of integration. IPI may include the investment in new materials, specialized technology, or the re‐design of the integration process. Conditions are given whereby the buyer partially outsources component demand as opposed to fully outsourcing or fully producing in‐house. Furthermore, conditions are given characterizing when the supplier's price and investment in IPI are substitute strategies versus complements. Both analytic and numerical results are presented.

Keywords

buyer–supplier problem integration process improvement partial outsourcing Stackelberg game volume‐based learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

E. A.

Jr. Parker

G. G.

. 2002. The effect of learning on the make/buy decision. Prod. Oper. Manag. 11(3): 313–339.

Anderson

E. A.

Jr. Parker

G. G.

. 2013. Integration and cospecialization of emerging complementary technologies by startups. Prod. Oper. Manag. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1111/j.1937‐5956.2012.01415.x.

Anderson

E. A.

Jr. Feng

Parker

G. G.

. 2011. Partial outsourcing and linked learning processes. Working paper. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=298624.

Bergen

S. A.

McLaughlin

C. P.

. 1988. The R&D/production interface: A four‐country comparison. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 8(7): 5–13.

Boone

Ganeshan

. 2001. The effect of information technology on learning in professional service organizations. J. Oper. Manag. 19(4): 485–495.

Carrillo

J. E.

Gaimon

. 2004. Managing knowledge‐based resource capabilities under uncertainty. Manage. Sci. 50(11): 1504–1518.

Chand

Moskowitz

Novak

Rekhi

Sorger

. 1996. Capacity allocation for dynamic process improvement with quality and demand considerations. Oper. Res. 44(6): 964–975.

Chiang

Wainwright

. 2005. Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics. McGraw Hill, New York, NY.

Dyer

J. H.

1994. Dedicated assets: Japan's manufacturing edge. Harv. Bus. Rev. 72(6): 174–178.

10.

Dyer

J. H.

1996. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategy Manag. J. 17(4): 271–291.

11.

Dyer

J. H.

Ouchi

W. G.

. 1993. Japanese‐style partnerships: Giving companies a competitive edge. Sloan Manag. Rev. 35(1): 51–63.

12.

Ettlie

J. E.

1995. Product‐process development integration in manufacturing. Manage. Sci. 41(7): 1224–1237.

13.

Ettlie

J. E.

Reifeis

S. A.

. 1987. Integrating design and manufacturing to deploy advanced manufacturing technology. Interfaces 17(6): 63–75.

14.

Fine

C. H.

Whitney

D. E.

. 1996. Is the Make‐Buy Decision Process a Core Competence? MIT Center for Technology, Policy, and Industrial Development, Cambridge, MA.

15.

Ghemawat

1986. Sustainable advantage. Harv. Bus. Rev. 64(5): 53–58.

16.

Gray

J. V.

Tomlin

Roth

A. V.

. 2009. Outsourcing to a powerful contract manufacturer: The effect of learning‐by‐doing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 18(5): 487–505.

17.

Iansiti

1995a. Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment. Res. Policy 24(4): 521–542.

18.

Iansiti

1995b. Technology development and integration: An empirical study of the interaction between applied science and product development. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 42(3): 259–269.

19.

Johnson

H. T.

Kaplan

R. S.

. 1987. Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

20.

Kossiakoff

Sweet

W. N.

Seymour

S. J.

Biemer

S. M.

. 2003. Systems Engineering Principles and Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.

21.

Linton

2011. Conversations with Mr. Linton, former Chief Procurement Officer of LG.

22.

Parmigiani

2007. Why do firms both make and buy? An investigation of concurrent sourcing. Strategy Manag. J. 28(3): 285–311.

23.

Pisano

G. P.

Shih

W. C.

. 2009. Restoring American competitiveness. Harv. Bus. Rev. 87(7/8): 114–125.

24.

Plambeck

E. L.

Taylor

T. A.

. 2005. Sell the plant? The impact of contract manufacturing on innovation, capacity, and profitability. Manage. Sci. 51(1): 133–150.

25.

Seewer

2004. Supplier‐run plant to be built in Ohio. Associated Press Newswires, August 3.

26.

van Arnum

2000. Bulls or bears? Outlook in contract manufacturing. Chem. Mark. Reporter February 14: FR3–FR6.

27.

Wright

T. P.

1936. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 3: 122–128.

28.

Yelle

L. E.

1979. The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey. Decis. Sci. 10(2): 302–328.

29.

Zerega

1999. Real men hire fabs: Chip companies are cutting costs by outsourcing. Red Herring, March 1.