We examine the relationship between Operational Productivity (OP), Corporate Social Performance (CSP), Financial Performance (FP), and risk. Our sample frame comprises 476 firms in nine US manufacturing industries during the period 1999–2009. We employ DEA‐based measures for OP and CSP, two operationalizations for FP to reflect current profitability and market value, and two operationalizations for risk to reflect bankruptcy risk and stock price volatility. We confirm that OP is essential for good financial performance and reduced risk (as expected), but the main effects of CSP are mixed. Importantly, we find that OP moderates the CSP–FP and CSP–risk relationships. Specifically, if OP is poor, CSP is of limited benefit to FP or risk. However, at or above a threshold level of OP, firms can use CSP to build upon it to yield further improvements in FP and reductions in risk. We discuss the implications of our findings for theory and practice.
AlexanderG. J.BuchholzR. A.. 1978. Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Acad. Manage. J.21(3): 479–486.
2.
AltmanE. I.1973. Predicting railroad bankruptcies in America. Bell J. Econ. Manage. Sci.4(1): 184–211.
3.
BailyM. N.GersbachH.SchererF. M.LichtenbergF. R.. 1995. Efficiency in manufacturing and the need for global competition. Microneconomics1995: 307–358.
4.
BankerR. D.CharnesA.CooperW. W.. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci.30(9): 1078–1092.
5.
BarnettM. L.SalomonR. M.. 2006. Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strat. Manage. J.27(11): 1101–1122.
6.
BarnettM. L.SalomonR. M.. 2012. Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strat. Manage. J.33(11): 1304–1320.
7.
BarneyJ.1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag.17(1): 99–120.
8.
BellA.JonesK.. 2015. Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time‐series cross‐sectional and panel data. Polit. Sci. Res. Methods3(1): 133–153.
9.
BourgeoisL. J.1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad. Manage. Rev.6(1): 29–39.
10.
BouslahK.KryzanowskiL.M'ZaliB.. 2013. The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. J. Bank. Finance37(4): 1258–1273.
11.
Boutin‐DufresneF.SavariaP.. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and financial risk. J. Invest.13(1): 57–66.
12.
BowlinW. F.1998. Measuring performance: An introduction to data envelopment analysis (DEA). J. Cost Anal.15(2): 3–27.
13.
ByunS. K.OhJ. M.. 2014. Publicity of corporate social responsibility and shareholder wealth. Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=2153248 or doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2153248 (accessed date May 27, 2016).
14.
CarrollA. B.1979. A three‐dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad. Manage. Rev.4(4): 497–505.
15.
CarrollA. B.1999. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Bus. Soc.38(3): 268–295.
16.
CharnesA.CooperW. W.RhodesE.. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res.2(6): 429–444.
17.
ChenC.‐M.DelmasM.. 2011. Measuring corporate social performance: An efficiency perspective. Prod. Oper. Manag.20(6): 789–804.
ChungK. H.PruittS. W.. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financ. Manag.23(3): 70–74.
20.
CookW.2011. Qualitative data in DEA. CooperW. W.SeifordL. M.ZhuJ., eds. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer, New York, 151–172.
21.
CookW. D.ZhuJ.. 2006. Rank order data in DEA: A general framework. Eur. J. Oper. Res.174(2): 1021–1038.
22.
DahlsrudA.2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag.15(1): 1–13.
23.
DannaK.GriffinR. W.. 1999. Health and well‐being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. J. Manag.25(3): 357–384.
24.
DattaD. K.GuthrieJ. P.WrightP. M.. 2005. Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter?Acad. Manage. J.48(1): 135–145.
25.
DelmasM.BlassV. D.. 2010. Measuring corporate environmental performance: The trade‐offs of sustainability ratings. Bus. Strat. Environ.19(4): 245–260.
26.
DemingW. E.1981. Improvement of quality and productivity through action by management. Natl. Prod. Rev.1(1): 12–22.
27.
DowellG.HartS.YeungB.. 2000. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value?Management Sci.46(8): 1059–1074.
28.
DuttaS.NarasimhanO.RajivS.. 1999. Success in high‐technology markets: Is marketing capability critical?Market. Sci.18(4): 547–568.
29.
FerdowsK.DeMepyerA.. 1990. Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: In search of a new theory. J. Oper. Manag.9(2): 168–184.
30.
FloridaR.1996. Lean and green: The move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. Calif. Manage. Rev.39(1): 80–105.
31.
FlynnB. B.FlynnE. J.. 2004. An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities. J. Oper. Manag.22(5): 439–457.
32.
FriedmanM.1970. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, New York.
33.
GodfreyP. C.2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev.30(4): 777–798.
34.
GodfreyP. C.MerrillC. B.HansenJ. M.. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder wealth: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strat. Manage. J.30(4): 425–445.
35.
GolanyB.RollY.. 1989. An application procedure for DEA. Omega17(3): 237–250.
36.
GriffinJ. J.MahonJ. F.. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Bus. Soc.36(1): 5–31.
37.
HansenD. S.DunfordB. B.BossA. D.BossR. W.AngermeierI.. 2011. Corporate social responsibility and the benefits of employee trust: A cross‐disciplinary perspective. J. Bus. Ethics102(1): 29–45.
38.
HartS. L.AhujaG.. 1996. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strat. Environ.5(1): 30–37.
39.
HayesR. H.WheelwrightS. C.. 1984. Restoring our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing. Wiley, New York, NY.
40.
HendricksK. B.SinghalV. R.. 2005. An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long‐run stock performance and equity risk of the firm. Prod. Oper. Manag.14(1): 35–52.
41.
HendryJ. R.2006. Taking aim at business: What factors lead environmental non‐governmental organizations to target particular firms?Bus. Soc.45: 47–86.
42.
HerremansI. M.AkathapornP.McInnesM.. 1993. An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance. Acc. Organ. Soc.18(7–8): 587–604.
43.
HoferC.ErogluC.HoferA. R.. 2012. The effect of lean production on financial performance: The mediating role of inventory leanness. Int. J. Prod. Econ.138(2): 242–253.
44.
JonesT. M.1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad. Manage. Rev.20(2): 404–437.
45.
KhannaM.DamonL. A.. 1999. EPA's voluntary 33/50 program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. J. Environ. Econ. Manag.37(1): 1–25.
46.
KingA. A.LenoxM. J.. 2001. Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Prod. Oper. Manag.10(3): 244–256.
47.
KlassenR. D.McLaughlinC. P.. 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Sci.42(8): 1199–1214.
48.
KLD. 2006. Getting Started with KLD Stats and KLD's Ratings Definitions. KLD Research & Analytics, Boston, MA.
KoprowskiE. J.1981. Exploring the meaning of “good management”. Acad. Manage. Rev.6(3): 459–467.
51.
KrasnikovA.JayachandranS.. 2008. The relative impact of marketing, research‐and‐development, and operations capabilities on firm performance. J. Market.72(4): 1–11.
52.
LeeD. D.FaffR. W.. 2009. Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. Financ. Rev.44(2): 213–237.
53.
MargolisJ. D.WalshJ. P.. 2001. People and Profits? The Search for a Link Between a Company's Social and Financial Performance. Taylor & Francis, London.
54.
MattinglyJ. E.BermanS. L.. 2006. Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in Kinder Lydenberg Domini ratings data. Bus. Soc.45(1): 20–46.
55.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD.. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev.26(1): 117–127.
56.
MegnaP.KlockM.. 1993. The impact of intangible capital on Tobin's q in the semiconductor industry. Am. Econ. Rev.83(2): 265–269.
57.
MillerK. D.BromileyP.. 1990. Strategic risk and corporate performance: An analysis of alternative risk measures. Acad. Manage. J.33(4): 756–779.
58.
NohriaN.GulatiR.. 1996. Is slack good or bad for innovation?Acad. Manage. J.39(5): 1245–1264.
59.
OrlitzkyM.2011. Institutional logics in the study of organizations: The social construction of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Bus. Ethics Q.21(3): 409–444.
60.
OrlitzkyM.2013. Corporate social responsibility, noise, and stock market volatility. Acad. Manage. Perspect.27(3): 238–254.
61.
OrlitzkyM.BenjaminJ. D.. 2001. Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta‐analytic review. Bus. Soc.40(4): 369–396.
62.
OrlitzkyM.SchmidtF. L.RynesS. L.. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta‐analysis. Organ. Stud.24(3): 403–441.
63.
PilF. K.RothenbergS.. 2003. Environmental performance as a driver of superior quality. Prod. Oper. Manag.12(3): 404–415.
64.
PinneyC.2001. How to Manage Corporate Social Responsibility and Reputation in a Global Marketplace: The Challenge for Canadian Business. Canadian Centre for Philanthropy, Toronto, ON.
65.
PorterM.van derLindeC.. 1995. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harv. Bus. Rev.73(5): 120–134.
66.
RaoP.HoltD.. 2005. Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag.25(9): 898–916.
67.
ReinhardtF.1999. Market failure and the environmental policies of firms. J. Ind. Ecol.3(1): 9–21.
68.
RothenbergS.PilF. K.MaxwellJ.. 2001. Lean, green, and the quest for superior environmental performance. Prod. Oper. Manag.10(3): 228–243.
69.
RousseauD. M.1989. Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employ. Responsib. Rights J.2(2): 121–139.
70.
RussoM. V.FoutsP. A.. 1997. A resource‐based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Manage. J.40(3): 534–559.
71.
SahutJ. M.BoulerneS.MiliM.. 2011. What relation exists between CSR and longevity of firms? Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=1760569 or doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1760569 (accessed date May 27, 2016).
72.
SchulerD. A.CordingM.. 2006. A corporate social performance–corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Acad. Manage. Rev.31(3): 540–558.
73.
SenS.BhattacharyaC. B.KorschunD.. 2006. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. J. Acad. Mark. Sci.34(2): 158–166.
74.
ServaesH.TamayoA.. 2013. The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Sci.59(5): 1045–1061.
75.
ShahR.WardP. T.. 2007. Defining and developing measures of lean production. J. Oper. Manag.25(4): 785–805.
76.
SroufeR.2003. Effects of environmental management systems on environmental management practices and operations. Prod. Oper. Manag.12(3): 416–431.
77.
SurrocaJ.TribóJ. A.WaddockS.. 2010. Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strat. Manage. J.31(5): 463–490.
78.
TurbanD. B.GreeningD. W.. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness. Acad. Manage. J.40(3): 658–672.
79.
İmrohoroğluA.TüzelŞ.. 2014. Firm‐level productivity, risk, and return. Management Sci.60(8): 2073–2090.
80.
VanReenanJ.2011. Does competition raise productivity through improving management quality?Int. J. Ind. Organ.29(3): 306–316.
81.
WaddockS.2003. Myths and realities of social investing. Organ. Environ.16(3): 369–380.
82.
WaddockS. A.GravesS. B.. 1997. The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strat. Manage. J.18(4): 303–319.
83.
WeberM.2008. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company‐level measurement approach for CSR. Eur. Manage. J.26(4): 247–261.
84.
WoodD. J.2010. Measuring corporate social performance: A review. Int. J. Manage. Rev.12(1): 50–84.
85.
ZyglidopoulosS. C.GeorgiadisA. P.CarrollC. E.SiegelD. S.. 2012. Does media attention drive corporate social responsibility?J. Bus. Res.65(11): 1622–1627.
