Optimal Feed‐In Tariff Policies: The Impact of Market Structure and Technology Characteristics

Abstract

This study models a multi‐player environment consisting of a grid operator responsible for meeting electricity demands, a photovoltaic (PV) manufacturer, customers who might install (solar) PV systems, and a regulator who must set an optimal feed‐in tariff (FIT). The grid operator must meet exogenous electricity demand and also buy back all electricity (produced by PV systems) at the FIT set by the regulator. Customers decide whether or not to invest in a PV system. Adoption rates affect the manufacturer and operator by (respectively) establishing the demand for PV systems and determining how much PV electricity is fed into the grid. The PV manufacturer’s decision variable is the sales price per PV unit. The decisions of all players in the model are intertwined in a way that clearly affects their respective welfare. We demonstrate in particular how technology and market characteristics—including PV manufacturing cost and market competition—change the optimal decisions of players and thereby influence the effectiveness of FITs, the number of PV adopters, and the cost to provide the social benefit of on‐demand electricity. Our findings confirm the importance of considering technology manufacturers when devising schemes to incentivize the adoption of PV systems.

Keywords

feed‐in tariff policy renewables technology adoption competition efficiency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aflaki

Netessine

. 2017. Strategic investment in renewable energy sources: The effect of supply intermittency. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 19(3): 489–507.

Aliyu

A. S.

Ramli

A. T.

Saleh

M. A.

. 2013. Nigeria electricity crisis: Power generation capacity expansion and environmental ramifications. Energy 61: 354–367.

Alizamir

de Véricourt

Sun

. 2016. Efficient feed‐in‐tariff policies for renewable energy technologies. Oper. Res. 64(1): 52–66.

Allon

Federgruen

. 2009. Competition in service industries with segmented markets. Management Sci. 55(4): 619–634.

Atasu

Souza

G. C.

. 2013. How does product recovery affect quality choice? Prod. Oper. Manag. 22(4): 991–1010.

Atasu

Sarvary

Van Wassenhove

L. N.

. 2008. Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Management Sci. 54(10): 1731–1746.

Atasu

Van Wassenhove

L. N.

Sarvary

. 2009. Efficient take‐back legislation. Prod. Oper. Manag. 18(3): 243–258.

Baker

Fowlie

Lemoine

Reynolds

S. S.

. 2013. The economics of solar electricity. Ann. Rev. Resourc. Econ. 5: 387–426.

Brightstarsolar . 2014. Common sizes of solar panels. Available at http://brightstarsolar.net/2014/02/common-sizes-of-solar-panels/ (accessed date April 10, 2015).

10.

Carley

2009. State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energy Pol. 37(8): 3071–3081.

11.

Cohen

M. C.

Lobel

Perakis

. 2015a. The impact of demand uncertainty on consumer subsidies for green technology adoption. Management Sci. 62(5): 1235–1258.

12.

Cohen

M. C.

Perakis

Thraves

. 2015b. Competition and externalities in green technology adoption. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEPR) in May 2015 – CEEPR WP 2015‐007.

13.

Convergence‐Energy . 2013. How a solar farm works. Available at https://bit.ly/1LJqITl (accessed date August 22, 2015).

14.

Couture

Gagnon

. 2010. An analysis of feed‐in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment. Energy Pol. 38(2): 955–965.

15.

Deign

2018. European renewables are up. so are carbon emissions. Available at https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/european-renewables-are-up-so-are-carbon-emissions#gs.v8vmHck (accessed date October 3, 2018).

16.

Dong

C. G.

2012. Feed‐in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard: An empirical test of their relative effectiveness in promoting wind capacity development. Energy Pol. 42: 476–485.

17.

Drake

D. F.

Spinler

. 2013. Om forum‐sustainable operations management: An enduring stream or a passing fancy? Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 15(4): 689–700.

18.

Drake

Kleindorfer

P. R.

Van Wassenhove

L. N.

. 2010. Technology choice and capacity investment under emissions regulation. Faculty Res. 93(10): 128–145.

19.

Fan

Xiao

. 2015. Competition and subsidies in the deregulated us local telephone industry. Rand J. Econ. 46(4): 751–776.

20.

Ferguson

M. E.

Toktay

L. B.

. 2006. The effect of competition on recovery strategies. Prod. Oper. Manag. 15(3): 351–368.

21.

Frey

E. F.

Mojtahedi

. 2018. The impact of solar subsidies on California's non‐residential sector. Energy Pol. 122: 27–35.

22.

Friedman

Margolis

Seel

. 2016. Comparing photovoltaic (PV) costs and deployment drivers in the japanese and us residential and commercial markets. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States).

23.

Frondel

Ritter

Schmidt

C. M.

Vance

. 2010. Economic impacts from the promotion of renewable energy technologies: The german experience. Energy Pol. 38(8): 4048–4056.

24.

Hanson

G. H.

2005. Market potential, increasing returns and geographic concentration. J. Int. Econ. 67(1): 1–24.

25.

Harsha

Dahleh

. 2011. Optimal sizing of energy storage for efficient integration of renewable energy. Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC‐ECC), 2011 50th IEEE Conference on. IEEE, Orlando, FL, pp. 5813–5819.

26.

Hart

E. K.

Stoutenburg

E. D.

Jacobson

M. Z.

. 2012. The potential of intermittent renewables to meet electric power demand: Current methods and emerging analytical techniques. Proc. IEEE 100(2): 322–334.

27.

Hill

2017. Total PV manufacturing capacity announcement by countries 2017. Available at https://bit.ly/2xBkgwG (accessed date February 11, 2018).

28.

Souza

G. C.

Ferguson

M. E.

Wang

. 2015. Capacity investment in renewable energy technology with supply intermittency: Data granularity matters! Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 17(4): 480–494.

29.

Huo

Zhao

Zhou

. 2014. The effects of competitive environment on supply chain information sharing and performance: An empirical study in china. Prod. Oper. Manag. 23(4): 552–569.

30.

IEA . 2014. World energy outlook 2014.

31.

International Energy Agency . 2014. Technology roadmap: Solar photovoltaic energy (roadmap).

32.

IRENA Policy Brief, Abu Dhabi, IRENA Secretariat . 2012. Evaluating policies in support of the deployment of renewable power. Technical report, IRENA.

33.

Jenner

Groba

Indvik

. 2013. Assessing the strength and effectiveness of renewable electricity feed‐in tariffs in european union countries. Energy Pol. 52: 385–401.

34.

Kalish

Lilien

G. L.

. 1986. A market entry timing model for new technologies. Management Sci. 32(2): 194–205.

35.

Klein

2008. Feed‐in Tariff Designs: Options to Support Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy Sources. VDM Verlag Dr. Müeller, Saarbrücken, Germany.

36.

Kleindorfer

P. R.

Singhal

Wassenhove

L. N.

. 2005. Sustainable operations management. Prod. Oper. Manag. 14(4): 482–492.

37.

Kobos

P. H.

Erickson

J. D.

Drennen

T. E.

. 2006. Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications for us renewable energy policy. Energy Pol. 34(13): 1645–1658.

38.

Kök

A. G.

Shang

Yücel

. 2016. Impact of electricity pricing policies on renewable energy investments and carbon emissions. Management Sci. 64(1): 131–148.

39.

Krugman

1980. Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 70(5): 950–959.

40.

Lariviere

M. A.

Porteus

E. L.

. 2001. Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price‐only contracts. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 3(4): 293–305.

41.

Lesser

J. A.

. 2008. Design of an economically efficient feed‐in tariff structure for renewable energy development. Energy Pol. 36(3): 981–990.

42.

Lobel

Perakis

. 2011. Consumer choice model for forecasting demand and designing incentives for solar technology. Social Science Research Network, MIT, Cambridge.

43.

Maehlum

M. A.

2014. What‘s the difference between net metering and feed‐in tariffs? Available at http://energyinformative.org/net-metering-feed-in-tariffs-difference (accessed date July 5, 2015).

44.

Majumder

Groenevelt

. 2001. Competition in remanufacturing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 10(2): 125–141.

45.

Marques

A. C.

Fuinhas

J. A.

. 2012. Are public policies towards renewables successful? Evidence from european countries. Renewable Energy 44: 109–118.

46.

Mitra

Webster

. 2008. Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 111(2): 287–298.

47.

Munoz

Wogrin

Oren

S. S.

Hobbs

B. F.

. 2017. Economic inefficiencies of cost‐based electricity market designs. USAEE Working Paper No. 17‐313. United States Association for Energy Economics ‐ USAEE Research Paper Series.

48.

Ölz

2008. Deploying renewables: Principles for effective policies. International Energy Agency (IEA).

49.

Perrin

L.‐M.

2013. Mapping power and utilities regulation in europe. EY Global Power & Utilities Center, EYGM Limited.

50.

Rathmann

Winkel

Stricker

ECOFYS Mario Ragwitz Held

Pfluger

Resch

Panzer

Busch

EEG Inga Konstantinaviciute . 2011. Renewable energy policy country profiles. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe, Germany.

51.

Ren

Gao

Ruan

. 2009. Economic optimization and sensitivity analysis of photovoltaic system in residential buildings. Renewable Energy 34(3): 883–889.

52.

REN21 . 2018. Renewables 2018 Global Status Report. REN21 Secretariat, Paris.

53.

del Rio

Mir‐Artigues

. 2014. A cautionary tale: Spain’s solar PV investment bubble. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Available at https://www.iisd.org/gsi/sites/default/files/rens_ct_spain.pdf (accessed date March 14, 2018).

54.

Rigter

Vidican

. 2010. Cost and optimal feed‐in tariff for small scale photovoltaic systems in china. Energy Pol. 38(11): 6989–7000.

55.

Rogers

E. M.

1995. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.

56.

Sandén

B. A.

2005. The economic and institutional rationale of PV subsidies. Sol. Energy 78(2): 137–146.

57.

Savaskan

R. C.

Van Wassenhove

L. N.

. 2006. Reverse channel design: The case of competing retailers. Management Sci. 52(1): 1–14.

58.

Sun

Nie

. 2015. A comparative study of feed‐in tariff and renewable portfolio standard policy in renewable energy industry. Renewable Energy 74: 255–262.

59.

Tabatabaei

S. M.

Hadian

Marzban

Zibaei

. 2017. Economic, welfare and environmental impact of feed‐in tariff policy: A case study in iran. Energy Pol. 102: 164–169.

60.

Wani

Malhotra

Venkataraman

. 2018. Impact of competition on process of care and resource investments. J. Oper. Manag. 57: 23–35.

61.

Wearden

2009. Edf pays 2m penalty for poor customer service. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2009/jul/24/edf-fined-connection-failures-ofgem (accessed date October 30, 2018).

62.

Wirth

Schneider

. 2013. Recent facts about photovoltaics in germany. Report from Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, Germany

63.

O. Q.

Kapuscinski

. 2013. Curtailing intermittent generation in electrical systems. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 15(4): 578–595.

64.

Zhou

. 2017. The optimal reverse channel choice under supply chain competition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 259(1): 63–66.