An Examination of Campus Recreation Usage,Academic Performance,and Selected Health Indices of College Freshmen

Abstract

Cross-sectional research shows that campus recreation (CR) facility use is related to higher grade point averages (GPA) and favorable health indices. Further research is needed to address whether the relationships are caused by greater use of CR facilities or the accommodation of existing behaviors valued by students with higher GPA and favorable health indices. Thus, 179 first year student's GPA, body mass index (BMI), television (TV) viewing, physical activity (IPAQ), and nutrient intakes were compared between those who increased CR visits (by ≥ 1 day/wk), and those who decreased CR visits (by ≥ 1 day/wk) between fall and spring semesters. No significant (p < .05) differences were found between the groups for GPA, BMI, TV time, IPAQ scores, or nutrient intakes. Though these data indicate that GPA and health indices are minimally impacted by an increase or decrease in CR use, they suggest that students with higher GPA and favorable health indices are more likely to use CR facilities.

Keywords

extracurricular activity grade point average body mass index diet exercise

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American College Health Association. (2008). American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment: Reference Group Data Report Fall 2007. Baltimore: American College Health Association.

Astin

(1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 518–529.

Bauman

, Bull

, Chey

, Craig

, Ainsworth

, Sallis

, … Pratt

, & The IPS Group. (2009). The International Prevalence Study on Physical Activity: Results from 20 countries. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 6, 21. doi[:]10.1186/1479-5868-6-21

Belch

, Gebel

, & Mass

(2001). Relationship between student recreation complex use, academic performance, and persistence of first-time freshmen. NASPA Journal, 38, 254–268. doi[:]10.2202/0027-6014.1138

Connaughton

, Hausenblas

, Balog

, Musto

, & Brown

(2003). An examination of self-reported grade point averages and physical fitness levels in college students. Journal of the Florida Alliance for Health, Physical Education. Recreation & Dance, 41, 6–10.

Craig

, Marshall

, Sjostrom

, Bauman

, Booth

, Ainsworth

, … Oja

(2003). International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 35, 1381–1395. doi[:]10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB

Daugherty

, & Lane

(1999). A longitudinal study of academic and social predictors of college attrition. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 355–362. doi[:]10.2224/sbp.1999.27.4.355

Food, and Nutrition Board., (2005). Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids (macronutrients). Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

Gibbison

G.A.

, Henry

T.L.

, & Perkins-Brown

(2011). The chicken soup effect: The role of recreation and intramural participation in boosting freshman grade point average. Economics of Education Review, 30, 247–257. doi[:]10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.09.003

10.

Gruber

(1975). Exercise and mental performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 28–40.

11.

Huesman

, Brown

, Lee

, Kellogg

, & Radcliffe

(2007, September). Modeling student academic success: Does usage of campus recreation facilities make a difference? Paper presented at The National Symposium on Student Retention, Milwaukee, WI.

12.

Lowry

, Galuska

, Fulton

, Weschler

, Kann

, & Collins

(2000). Physical activity, food choice, and weight management goals and practices among U.S. college students. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18, 18–27. doi[:]10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00107-5

13.

Thompson

, Midthune

, Subar

, Kahle

, Schatzkin

, & Kipnis

(2004). Performance of a short tool to assess dietary intakes of fruits and vegetables, percentage energy from fat and fibre. Public Health Nutrition, 7, 1097–1105. doi[:]10.1079/PHN2004642

14.

Todd

, Czyszczon

, Wallace Carr

, & Pratt

(2009). Comparison of health and academic índices between campus recreation facility users and nonusers. Recreational Sports Journal, 33, 43–53.

15.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2005). Dietary guidelines for Americans, 2005 (6th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

16.

Watson

J.C.

, Ayers

S.F.

, Zizzi

, & Naoi

(2006). Student recreation centers: A comparison of users and non-users on psychosocial variables. Recreational Sports Journal, 30, 9–19.