Factor Knowledge Mining Using the Techniques of AI Neural Networks and Self-Organizing Map

Abstract

This paper offers a hybrid technique combined by artificial neural networks (ANN) and self-organizing map (SOM) as a way to explore factor knowledge. ANN and SOM are two kinds of pattern classification techniques based on supervised and unsupervised mechanisms, respectively. This paper proposes a new aspect to combine ANN and SOM as NNSOM process in order to delve into factor knowledge other than pattern classification. The experimental material is conducted by the investigation of street night market in Taiwan. NNSOM process can yield two results about factor knowledge: first, which factor is the most important factor for the development of street night market; second, what value of this factor is most positive to the development of street night market. NNSOM process can combine the advantages of supervised and unsupervised mechanisms and be applied to different disciplines.

1. Introduction

Since the technology of geographic information system (GIS) has been more popular and improved recently, how to apply suitable artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms with GIS that can assist researchers in solving their environmental problems is an important trend in urban-related domains nowadays [1–5]. There are two kinds of AI algorithm mainly discussed and applied in this paper: artificial neural networks (ANN) and self-organizing map (SOM).

ANN is a kind of AI technique based on the theory of neural science with useful advantages, such as the endurance of data noise, optimization and approximation, and great prediction ability [6, 7]. Because of these advantages, ANN has been applied to lots of comprehensive applications like land use changes [1, 2], regional labor market [8], traffic management [9], and regional economic activities [10], even though ANN has already been developed for quite a long time. Basically, ANN is a pattern classification technique based on supervised learning mechanism operated by statistic mathematics [7, 11]. Therefore, most of the ANN applications emphasized pattern classification performance. The discussion about the input factor analysis is still lacking because of the inherent limitation of ANN. The combination of SOM can bring out a new way for the issue of factor analyzing.

SOM also known as Kohonen map is another neural network technique based on unsupervised learning mechanism [12]. SOM is a kind of clustering technique which operated in dimensional space. The development of SOM is later than ANN but still has been widely applied in many research tasks like clustering data, monitoring process, and identifying particular pattern [13–16]. There are two important features of SOM: abstraction and visualization, which can make SOM unique clustering technique out of others [12, 17]. Depending on these two advantages, SOM not only can do clustering task but also can display the complicated distribution of data on limited dimensional space established by the assigned input factors. From this point of view, SOM can be seen as a kind of analyzing technique operated by specific input factors.

Overall, SOM can demonstrate data distribution through the assigned input factors with limited dimensional space, and then we can observe the density of data in order to learn where sectors of the limited dimensional space could be more sensitive to the assigned input factors after clustering process. However, because of the essence of unsupervised mechanism, there is no information about target pattern along the way of SOM procedure. Therefore, we do not have enough information to clarify these sensitive sectors which related to the assigned input factors that are positive or negative for particular pattern. On the other hand, the outcome value of ANN calculated by the process of supervised mechanism can indicate the tendency of target pattern in order to do pattern classification performance. But there is no such operation in ANN procedure that can assist us in displaying the detailed distribution of data by the assigned input factors and help us answer question like the following: what values of the assigned input factors could be more sensitive with target pattern? Hence, ANN and SOM are both lacking the ability to delve into detailed factor knowledge between the assigned input factors and target pattern traditionally. But the interesting thing is that the lack of ability of each one can be found out from the other one. That is the main motivation of this paper for combining ANN and SOM.

The main purpose of this paper is to combine the advantages of ANN and SOM in order to conquer the problems mentioned above. This paper offers an idea: look at ANN outcome as one particular input factor which can indicate the impact of target pattern and then use this ANN factor with other input factors to conduct SOM procedure. By doing so, we can perform the clustering process with the information of target pattern, and then deeply analyzing the correlations between the assigned input factors and target pattern can be possible.

As the notion mentioned above, this paper presents a combination technique of ANN and SOM named NNSOM as a specific factor analyzing process. In order to demonstrate the abilities of NNSOM, we practice an experiment related to urban space study. The experimental material is a kind of commercial development on the streets, Taiwanese street night market. The application of NNSOM can solve two questions after the experiment: first, which factor is the most important factor for target pattern; second, what value of this factor is most positive to target pattern. NNSOM process can combine the advantages of supervised and unsupervised mechanisms and be applied to different disciplines for exploring factor knowledge.

2. Methodologies and Techniques

2.1. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)

ANN are well known as perceptron logic which derived from the imitation of human perception. The mechanism of ANN is like the function of our brain which can receive outside stimulation by neurons and then produce the best reaction by comprehensive consideration. For research application, the set of input factors is like the recipient part which can define and receive lots of information, then through a series of neural process to produce ANN outcome or pattern classification result [7, 11].

Normal ANN consists of three components. As Figure 1 shows, those are “input layer,” “hidden layer,” and “output layer.” Hidden layer is particularly a sensitive part among those components. Linear ANN refers to no hidden layer that has clearest correlation between target pattern and input factors, even though this model might not have well ANN performance. In contrast, nonlinear ANN refers to at least one hidden layer existing that can easily get higher ANN performance but lose crucial information between target pattern and input factors and that is the reason for why multilayer ANN is criticized as a kind of “black box” technique [18–20]. This paper emphasized delving into the detailed information between target pattern and input factors. Therefore we implement linear ANN as the reason for simplification in order to emphasize the abilities of NNSOM process.

Figure 1

The structure of ANN consists of input layer, hidden layer, and output layer.

Through supervised learning process, ANN can do pattern classification according to reality record. The reality record is so-called target pattern which is the standard for ANN output. Minimizing the deviation between ANN output and target pattern is the goal of ANN training iterations. The ANN outcome can be calculated by (1) after ANN training iteration:

\begin{matrix} Y_{j} = σ (\sum_{i = 1}^{n} W_{i j} X_{i} + β), \end{matrix}

(1)

where

Y_{j}

is the ANN outcome value of jth sample;

X_{i}

is ith factor value;

W_{i j}

is the ANN weight value; σ is the transfer function; and β is a bias value.

Normal ANN result is the performance of pattern classification transferred by the ANN outcome. Therefore ANN outcome can be seen as an indicator which can reveal the tendency of target pattern. By this aspect, we can do special factor analysis as we combine the ANN outcome into SOM.

2.2. Self-Organizing Map (SOM)

SOM or Kohonen map is based on unsupervised mechanism. The operation of SOM is conducted in dimensional feature space to process the distribution of data [12]. Normal SOM consists of two kinds of dimensional space; those are “the dimensional space of samples” which contains all samples recorded by their feature vectors and “the dimensional space of neurons” which contains all neurons with regular distribution. In addition, “the dimensional space of neurons” consists of two kinds of SOM vector layer; those are “SOM feature vector layer” and “SOM projection vector layer.” The number of dimensions in “SOM feature vector layer” is the same as “the dimensional space of samples.” But the number of dimensions in “SOM projection vector layer” can be any (normally using two dimensions for planar display). Figure 2 is the illustration for the concept and structure of SOM.

Figure 2

The samples recorded in the dimensional feature space of three dimensions for depicting the concept and structure of SOM.

SOM can do clustering task by competitive learning process. There are two kinds of neurons that can gain momentum to get closer to the objective sample in order to perform clustering result: BMU neuron and the neurons affected by “neighborhood effect” of BMU neuron [14, 16, 21]. For one neuron where the distance between itself and the objective sample is shorter than the other neurons, this neuron is the best matching unit (BMU). Besides BMU neuron, some other neurons whose positions are near to BMU neuron can be affected by “neighborhood effect.” We set a fixed radius centered by BMU neuron for the reason of simplification, if some other neurons within this radius can be affected by fixed “neighborhood effect.” BMU neuron and the neurons affected by “neighborhood effect” can change their positions for approaching the objective sample by the calculation of

\begin{matrix} {\underline{ω}}_{j} (t + 1) = {\underline{ω}}_{j} (t) + δ ({\underline{x}}_{i} - {\underline{ω}}_{j} (t)), \end{matrix}

(2)

where

{\underline{ω}}_{j}

is jth neuron's feature vector;

{\underline{x}}_{i}

is ith objective sample's feature vector; t refers to tth iteration; δ is the parameter which refers to momentum; δ is calculated by

\begin{matrix} δ = μ * s * d (t), \end{matrix}

(3)

where μ is the learning rate set in the range 0~1; s is the parameter of “neighborhood effect”; if one calculated neuron is BMU neuron, s should be set as 1; if one calculated neuron is affected by “neighborhood effect,” s should be set less than 1, where

d (t)

refers to a continuously decreased parameter; while the SOM iteration is running,

d (t)

will be continuously decreased.

d (t)

is calculated by

\begin{matrix} d (t) = 1 - (\frac{t}{N}), \end{matrix}

(4)

where N is the number of iterations.

Once finishing SOM procedure, the latest positions of neurons in “SOM feature vector layer” can be projected onto “SOM projection vector layer” for abstracting and visualizing the complicated distribution of samples. The demonstration of “SOM projection vector layer” can reveal which sectors have high density of samples by the assigned features. If we combine the ANN outcome into SOM as one kind of feature vector, then extracting the information from “SOM projection vector layer” with the information of target pattern can be possible. That is a unique concept of this paper compared to other applications of the combination of ANN and SOM.

2.3. The Unique Concept for Combining ANN and SOM as NNSOM

Some researchers have tried to combine the techniques of SOM and ANN for application research [22, 23], but this paper has different concept to combine both techniques. Most applications are applying SOM as a preliminary step of pattern classification. They often implement the clustering process of SOM to find out potential patterns first and then use these potential patterns as target patterns to conduct ANN for improving pattern classification performance. Thus, pattern classification is the main purpose of this sort of applications. In contrast, the main purpose of this paper is the application of factor analyzing by SOM mechanism; ANN is applied as a referential factor to indicate the impact of target pattern. Therefore, the operational steps in this paper are ANN procedure first and then SOM procedure in sequence. Because of the different motivation, this paper offers a unique concept to combine ANN and SOM as NNSOM process.

The features of SOM are clustering and abstracting the complicated distribution of data [12, 17]. The demonstration of “SOM projection vector layer” can extract detailed information with the assigned input factors. On the other hand, the ANN outcome can be seen as an indicator which can reveal each sample's tendency of target pattern. The concept of NNSOM is that if we use the ANN outcome as one kind of dimensional feature and operate with SOM in competitive learning process, then hire the ANN outcome and one objective factor as two feature dimensions to establish and demonstrate “SOM projection vector layer.” By doing so, we can deeply reveal detailed correlation between the ANN outcome and the objective factor. That means NNSOM process can explore detailed information between target pattern and the objective factor. Therefore, NNSOM can have the efficiency to delve into the detailed factor knowledge. For demonstrating the abilities of NNSOM, we practice an experiment in the following content.

3. Experimental Material and Operation Settings

The experimental material is Feng Chia night market, Taichung, Taiwan, which is a kind of Taiwanese night market developed along the streets around Feng Chia University. This kind of urban commercial phenomenon has some features like complexity, uncertainty, and being flexible and dynamic [24, 25]. The experiment is to investigate what environmental factors can affect a number of locations on the streets being occupied by informally commercial activities. The definition of informally commercial activities is various commercial activities or vendors occupying the locations of arcade, sidewalk, or road. These locations cannot be allowed to do any kinds of businesses by Taiwanese regulations, and this phenomenon is criticized as “out of place” generally [26].

The experimental area is set on the streets of Feng Chia night market, and the target pattern is the locations on the streets occupied by informally commercial activities. In order to define and record each location exactly, all the street areas have been transformed into lattice formation with GIS platform, as Figure 3 shows. Each lattice represents one grid-sample.

Figure 3

The distribution of target pattern recorded from reality; blue lattices are the grid-samples occupied by informally commercial activities, and they are the target pattern.

The number of grid-samples is 10940, and that contains 1717 occupied grid-samples (the target pattern) and 9223 unoccupied grid-samples. Each grid-sample is described by several environmental factors which derived from related literatures [26–29]. The descriptions of each factor are listed in Table 1, and all the factors have been dealt with through normalization by scaling of the range 0~1.

Table 1

The descriptions of environmental factors.

Factor denotation	Description
Grid location (GL)	For denoting that one grid-sample with its street location has certain impact of informally commercial attraction
Intersection factor (IntF)	The distance measured from one grid-sample to the nearest street intersection
Street width (SW)	The width of one street on which one grid-sample is located
Background building width (BBW)	The width of one building which is the background for one grid-sample
Core zone-1 (C1)	The distance measured from one grid-sample to core zone-1; core zone-1 is the main gate of Feng Chia University
Core zone-2 (C2)	The distance measured from one grid-sample to core zone-2; core zone-2 is the location of first bustling street intersection
Core zone-3 (C3)	The distance measured from one grid-sample to core zone-3; core zone-3 is the location of second bustling street intersection

The experiment consists of two experimental phases. The first experimental phase is ANN operation. In order to simplify the operation and focus on the purpose of factor analyzing, single-layer ANN is hired in this experimental phase. There are two results needed to be done in this experimental phase. The first result is to acquire the ANN outcome of each grid-sample, and this result can be calculated by (1). The second result is to find out which factor mentioned in Table 1 is the most important factor to affect the target pattern, and the second result can be done by analyzing the ANN weight values. All ANN experimental results in this experimental phase are then handing over to the second experimental phase.

The second experimental phase is NNSOM operation, which is mainly operated by SOM procedure and is including previous experimental results of ANN. There are eight features defined by the environmental factors of Table 1 and the ANN outcome for establishing the dimensional space of SOM. “SOM projection vector layer” is constructed by two-dimensional features which are the ANN outcome and the most important factor both derived from previous ANN operation. The formation of “SOM projection vector layer” is set by 35 × 35 grid formation; the vertical axis refers to the value of ANN outcome, and the horizontal axis refers to the value of the most important factor. Each SOM iteration is calculated by (2)~(4), and several SOM parameter settings are listed in Table 2. The next chapter is the results and discussions of NNSOM experiment.

Table 2

Parameter settings of SOM.

Parameter	Setting
The formation of “SOM projection vector layer”	35 × 35 grid formation
Learning rate (μ)	0.009
Neighborhood effect radius (centered by BMU neuron)	$1.45 D$ (D refers to the initial distance of two adjacent neurons)
Neighborhood effect for BMU neuron (s)	1
Neighborhood effect for other neurons (s)	0.3
The number of iterations (N)	600

4. Experimental Results and Discussions

4.1. The Results of ANN

The pattern classification performance of ANN is demonstrated in Table 3. Total accuracy is 84.23%. ANN procedure can derive the ANN outcome of each grid-sample as Figure 4 shows; dotted line is the classifying boundary; this boundary line is acquired by the average of 300 times of ANN performances. Any grid-samples where the ANN outcomes are above this boundary can be assigned as the target pattern.

Table 3

The classification performance of ANN.

	Total grid-samples	Occupied grid-samples (target pattern)	Unoccupied grid-samples
The number of grid-samples	10940	1717	9223
The number of missed classifications	1725	102	1623
Accuracy rate	84.23%	94.06%	82.4%

Figure 4

The result of ANN outcome.

We can observe the result of ANN weight values to evaluate which factor is the most important one for ANN conducting pattern classification. The ANN weight values of all factors are demonstrated in Table 4; checking this result in absolute value can figure out which factor is the most important one. If one factor has higher ANN weight value, this factor is more important for pattern classification [6, 7]. As Table 4 shows, the highest ANN weight value is “GL”; that means “GL” is the most important factor to assist ANN in judging some grid-samples as the target pattern. The next experimental phase of NNSOM can derive more detailed information between “GL” and the target pattern.

Table 4

The ANN weight values of each factor.

Factor	GL	IntF	SW	BBW	C1	C2	C3
Original ANN weight value	0.503729	0.112207	$- 0.12697$	$- 0.02611$	$- 0.17324$	0.197353	$- 0.18364$
Absolute value	0.503729	0.112207	0.12697	0.02611	0.17324	0.197353	0.18364

4.2. The Result of NNSOM

According to the previous result of ANN, we can then do advanced factor analyzing by NNSOM process. Because the most important factor is “GL,” “SOM projection vector layer” has to be established by the ANN outcome and “GL” in order to dig out detailed factor information. The final result of “SOM projection vector layer” is demonstrated in Figure 5(a); the crosses are the latest positions of neurons, and the additive circles are the marks for denoting specific neurons that are surrounded by at least 1000 grid-samples within the radius of $0.4 D$ (D refers to the initial distance of two adjacent neurons) in dimensional space. These additive circles are the cluster centers which can reveal the high density areas of grid-samples.

Figure 5

The demonstration of detailed factor analysis by NNSOM.

There is a graphically statistic figure bar chart hired in NNOSM phase for analyzing detailed information between “GL” and the target pattern, as Figure 5 shows. The dotted line in Figure 5(a) is the ANN classifying boundary which is the same as the previous description of Figure 4. There are two bar charts: “bar chart 1” demonstrates the correlation between the “GL” value and the number of cluster centers below the ANN boundary line and “bar chart 2” demonstrates the correlation between the “GL” value and the number of cluster centers above the ANN boundary line. Particularly for “bar chart 2,” this figure can determine what value of “GL” can be most positive to the target pattern with the distribution of cluster centers upon the ANN classifying boundary. As Figure 5 shows, the result of bar chart 2 can reveal that the most positive value of “GL” for the target pattern is 0.58. That means if one grid-sample's “GL” value is closer to 0.58, this grid-sample should have higher tendency to become the target pattern.

“GL” factor refers to different grid-sample locations on the streets having different levels of informally commercial attraction. The setting of “GL” values and descriptions is listed in Table 5, and 0.58 is close to the sixth “GL” level. This analyzing result can reveal that this kind of street location should have higher attraction for informally commercial activities than other “GL” conditions. This result can give researcher detailed implication for better understanding of this specific phenomenon. The analyzing process of NNSOM can apply to analyze other environmental factors as well for deeply exploring the detailed factor knowledge.

Table 5

The description of GL factor setting.

GL level	Definition	Variable value
GL 1	Grid-sample located on the fast car lane	0
GL 2	Grid-sample located on the slow car lane	0.125
GL 3	Grid-sample located on the street intersection	0.25
GL 4	Grid-sample located on the scooter lane	0.375
GL 5	Grid-sample located on the bike lane	0.5
GL 6	Grid-sample located on the bike lane next to the building	0.625
GL 7	Grid-sample located on the pedestrian sidewalk	0.75
GL 8	Grid-sample located on the arcade	0.875
GL 9	Grid-sample located on the special zone of night market	1

5. Conclusion

Computational modeling can assist researchers in simulating the research objective in order to learn the possible trend with deductive logic. ANN and SOM are two kinds of computational modeling techniques that have different concept to do pattern simulation. How to get higher simulating accuracy when applying these two computational techniques is always the important issue; but factor analysis is still lacking to discuss even though there is a lot of potential information hidden in factor assumption that can be revealed by efficient way of factor analyzing. Offering a combination of ANN and SOM for the application of factor analysis is the main purpose of this paper.

ANN belongs to supervised mechanism, and the main feature of ANN is the orientation of target pattern. SOM belongs to unsupervised mechanism, and the main feature of SOM is abstraction and visualization of data distribution by the assigned input factors. This paper offers a unique concept to combine ANN into SOM as NNSOM process; that is using the ANN outcome as one of the SOM input factors which can indicate the impact of target pattern and then doing SOM competitive learning process. The result of NNSOM can display clustering result with one objective factor and the ANN outcome, and then analyzing sectors with high density of data distribution can deeply reveal detailed correlation between the objective factor and the ANN outcome. Therefore, the application of NNSOM can solve two questions related to factor knowledge: first, which factor is the most important factor for target pattern; second, what value of this factor is most positive to target pattern. Because of the unique concept to combine ANN and SOM, NNSOM can implement factor analysis for extracting potential information other than pattern classification.

This paper practices an experiment for demonstrating the abilities of NNSOM. The experimental material is the phenomenon of street night market, and the target is to analyze a number of locations on the streets occupied by informally commercial activities. The experiment contains two experimental phases: the first one is ANN operation, and the second one is NNSOM operation. The first experimental phase can derive two experimental results: the ANN outcome of each sample is the first result; and the second result is that “GL” is the most important factor for the development of informally commercial activities along the streets. Through the analysis of “SOM projection vector layer” established by the ANN outcome and “GL” with bar chart in the second experimental phase, the most positive value of “GL” for the development of informally commercial activities along the streets is 0.58. This result can reveal detailed information about which kinds of locations on the streets can have highest attraction for informally commercial activities gathering. As the experimental demonstration, NNSOM can exactly extract detailed factor knowledge for better understanding of research objective.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by “The Fund of Scientific Research Projects for Introduction Talents, Huaqiao University” (Project no. Z14Y0009), and The Education Department of Fujian Province (Project no. JA15031).

References

Pijanowski

B. C.

Tayyebi

Doucette

Pekin

B. K.

Braun

Plourde

A big data urban growth simulation at a national scale: configuring the GIS and neural network based Land Transformation Model to run in a High Performance Computing (HPC) environment

Environmental Modelling & Software 2014 51 250 268

10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.015

2-s2.0-84887236259

Basse

R. M.

Omrani

Charif

Gerber

Bódis

Land use changes modelling using advanced methods: cellular automata and artificial neural networks. The spatial and explicit representation of land cover dynamics at the cross-border region scale

Applied Geography 2014 53 160 171

10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.016

2-s2.0-84903769454

Grekousis

Manetos

Photis

Y. N.

Modeling urban evolution using neural networks, fuzzy logic and GIS: the case of the Athens metropolitan area

Cities 2013 30 1 193 203

10.1016/j.cities.2012.03.006

2-s2.0-84871934138

Thapa

R. B.

Murayama

Urban growth modeling of Kathmandu metropolitan region, Nepal

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2011 35 1 25 34

10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07.005

2-s2.0-78650205824

Santé

García

A. M.

Miranda

Crecente

Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: a review and analysis

Landscape and Urban Planning 2010 96 2 108 122

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.001

2-s2.0-77951254556

Marzban

Haupt

S. E.

Pasini

Marzban

Basic statistics and basic AI: neural networks

Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Environmental Sciences 2009 1st

Berlin, Germany

Springer

15 47

10.1007/978-1-4020-9119-3_2

Bishop

C. M.

Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition 1995 1st

New York, NY, USA

Oxford University

Patuelli

Nijkamp

Longhi

Reggiani

Neural networks and genetic algorithms as forecasting tools: a case study on German regions

Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2008 35 4 701 722

10.1068/b3101

2-s2.0-48749110009

Kalyoncuoglu

S. F.

Tigdemir

An alternative approach for modelling and simulation of traffic data: artificial neural networks

Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 2004 12 5 351 362

10.1016/j.simpat.2004.04.002

2-s2.0-3242723964

10.

Nag

A. K.

Mitra

Forecasting daily foreign exchange rates using genetically optimized neural networks

Journal of Forecasting 2002 21 7 501 511

10.1002/for.838

2-s2.0-0036855813

11.

Duda

R. O.

Hart

P. E.

Stork

D. G.

Pattern Classification 2001 2nd

New York, NY, USA

John Wiley & Sons

MR1802993

12.

Kohonen

The self-organizing map

Neurocomputing 1998 21 1 6

13.

Oral

E. L.

Aydin

Supervised vs. unsupervised learning for construction crew productivity prediction

Automation in Construction 2012 22 271 276

10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.002

2-s2.0-84857373266

14.

Arribas-Bel

Nijkamp

Scholten

Multidimensional urban sprawl in Europe: a self-organizing map approach

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2011 35 4 263 275

10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.10.002

2-s2.0-79955985299

15.

Klement

Snášel

Using SOM in the performance monitoring of the emergency call-taking system

Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 2011 19 1 98 109

10.1016/j.simpat.2010.07.002

2-s2.0-78049408265

16.

Kalteh

A. M.

Hjorth

Berndtsson

Review of the self-organizing map (SOM) approach in water resources: analysis, modelling and application

Environmental Modelling & Software 2008 23 7 835 845

10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.10.001

2-s2.0-40749144865

17.

Kangas

Kohonen

Developments and applications of the self-organizing map and related algorithms

Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 1996 41 1-2 3 12

10.1016/0378-4754(96)88223-1

2-s2.0-0030165512

18.

Fischer

M. M.

Computational neural networks: a new paradigm for spatial analysis

Environment and Planning A 1998 30 10 1873 1891

10.1068/a301873

2-s2.0-0032458753

19.

Openshaw

Neural network, genetic, and fuzzy logic models of spatial interaction

Environment and Planning A 1998 30 10 1857 1872

10.1068/a301857

2-s2.0-0032449927

20.

Zhang

G. P.

An investigation of neural networks for linear time-series forecasting

Computers & Operations Research 2001 28 12 1183 1202

10.1016/s0305-0548(00)00033-2

2-s2.0-0035480297

21.

Bação

Lobo

Painho

The self-organizing map, the Geo-SOM, and relevant variants for geosciences

Computers & Geosciences 2005 31 2 155 163

10.1016/j.cageo.2004.06.013

2-s2.0-12344271105

22.

Jain

Srinivasulu

Integrated approach to model decomposed flow hydrograph using artificial neural network and conceptual techniques

Journal of Hydrology 2006 317 3-4 291 306

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.022

2-s2.0-28844473522

23.

Moradkhani

Hsu

K.-L.

Gupta

H. V.

Sorooshian

Improved streamflow forecasting using self-organizing radial basis function artificial neural networks

Journal of Hydrology 2004 295 1–4 246 262

10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.027

2-s2.0-3142538909

24.

Hsieh

A.-T.

Chang

Shopping and tourist night markets in Taiwan

Tourism Management 2006 27 1 138 145

10.1016/j.tourman.2004.06.017

2-s2.0-27644521590

25.

Chang

Hsieh

A.-T.

Leisure motives of eating out in night markets

Journal of Business Research 2006 59 12 1276 1278

10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.002

2-s2.0-33751246481

26.

Yatmo

Y. A.

Perception of street vendors as ‘out of place’ urban elements at day time and night time

Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009 29 4 467 476

10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.001

2-s2.0-70749155626

27.

Timothy

D. J.

Wall

Selling to tourists: Indonesian street vendors

Annals of Tourism Research 1997 24 2 322 340

10.1016/s0160-7383(97)80004-7

2-s2.0-0030860801

28.

Bromley

Street vending and public policy: a global review

International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 2000 20 1-2 1 28

10.1108/01443330010789052

29.

Cross

Street vendors, and postmodernity: conflict and compromise in the global economy

International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 2000 20 1-2 29 51

10.1108/01443330010789061