A qualitative study with people from four cultural groups living in Spain is presented. Objectives: To analyse the social psychological impact of migration, exploring perceived cultural differences and migration experiences. Design: 8 focus groups with participants from Bulgaria, Morocco, Ecuador and Colombia (n = 49 participants). Results: The most frequent discourses were related to acculturative stress: changes in social life, gender differences, and hierarchical distance. The security motive was an important reason for migrating. Problems regarding one's well-being and experiences of prejudice and discrimination were the most mentioned regarding adaptation to host country. Participants stress lower hierarchical values, more gender equality, less family orientation and collectivism in Spain compared to their country of origin. There are also differences in communication styles and modes. Conclusion: Participants perceive cultural differences between cultures regarding Individualism, Collectivism and Hierarchy, showing a dual relationship with the host culture. Legal barriers are the most important issue hindering individual and collective development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arends-Tó;thJ.Van der VijverF. J. R. (2006). Assessment of psychological acculturation. InSamD. L.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology (pp. 142–160). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BasabeN.PáezD.AierdiXJiménez-aristizabalA. (2009). Salud e Inmigración. Aculturación, bienestar subjetivo y calidad de vida.Zarautz: Ikuspegi. Observatorio Vasco de Inmigración. (Health and Immigration. Acculturation, subjective weel-being and quality of life).
3.
BasabeN.ZlobinaAPáezD. (2004). Integración socio-cultural y adaptación psicológica de los inmigrantes extranjeros en el País Vasco.Vitoria-Gasteiz: Servicio Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco. (Socio-cultural integration and psychological adaptation of foreign migrants in the Basque Country).
4.
BerryJ. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5–68.
5.
BerryJ. W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 697–712.
6.
BerryJ. W. (2006). Stress perspectives on acculturation. InSamD. L.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology (pp. 43–57). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BhugraD.BeckerM. A. (2005). Migration, cultural bereavement and cultural identity. World Psychiatry, 4, 18–24.
8.
BourhisR. Y.MoïseL. C.PerreaultS.SenécalS. (1997). Towards an Interactive Acculturation Model: A socio-psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369–386.
9.
CobbS. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, 300–314.
10.
DyalJ. A.DyalR. Y. (1981). Acculturation, stress and coping. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 5, 301–328.
11.
EhrensaftE.TousignantM. (2006). Immigration and resilience. InSamD. L.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology (pp. 469–483). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GhatakS.LevineP.Wheatley PriceS. (1996). Migration theories and evidence: An assessment. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10, 159–198.
13.
GregorioC. (2002). Procesos migratorios y desigualdades de género. InGarcía-minaA.CarrascoM. J. (Eds.), Cuestiones de género en el fenómeno de las migraciones (pp. 11–38). Madrid. Universidad Pontificia de Comillas. [Migration processes and gender inequalities].
14.
HatchA.WlsniewskiR. (Eds.), (1995). Life history and narrative.London: Falmer.
15.
HayesA.F.KrippendorffK. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measure, 1, 77–89.
16.
Hondagneu-SoteloP. (2005). Gendering Migration: Not for “femints only”—and not only in the household. CMD Working paper #05-02f Princeton University: The Centre for Migration and Development. Retrieved on July 15th, 2009 from cmd.princeton.edu/papers/wp0502f.pdf
17.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
HorenczykG. (1996). Migrant identities in conflict: Acculturation attitudes and perceived acculturation ideologies. InBreakwellG.LyonsE. (Eds.), Changing European Identities (pp. 241–250). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
19.
IgartuaJ. J.ChengL.MuñizC. (2005). Framing Latin America in the Spanish press. A cooled down friendship between two fraternal lands.Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 30, 359–372.
Jasinskaja-LahtiI.LiebkindK. (2007). A structural model of acculturation and well-being among immigrants from the former USSR in Finland. European Psychologist, 12, 80–92.
22.
KealeyD. (1989). A study of cross-cultural effectiveness: Theoretical issues, practical implications. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13, 387–428.
23.
KimJ. J.GudykunstW. (Eds.) (1998). Theories in intercultural communication.London: Sage.
24.
KingR.WoodN. (Eds.) (2001). Media and Migration: Constructions of Mobility and Difference.London: Routledge.
25.
KruegerR. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A practical Guide for Applied Research (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping.New York: Springer.
27.
LenzI.UllrichCH.FerschB. (EDS.) (2007). Gender Order Unbound?. Globalisation, Restructuring and Reciprocity.Opladen, Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
28.
LevineR.NorenzayanA. (1999). The pace of life in 31 countries.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30: 178–205.
29.
LiebkindK. (2006). Ethnic identity and acculturation. InSamD. L.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology (pp. 78–96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
LombardM.Snyder-DuchJ.BrackenC. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication research: An assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587–604.
31.
MargolisJ. (1995). Interpretation radical but not unruly.Berkeley: California University Press.
32.
MasgoretA.-M.WardC. (2006). Culture learning approach to acculturation. InSamD. L.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology (pp. 58–77). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MillwardL. J. (1995). Focus groups. InBreakwellG. M.HammondS.Fife-SchawC. (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (pp. 274–292). London: Sage.
34.
NavasM. S.PumaresP.SánchezJ.GarcíaM. C.RojasA.CuadradoI.AsensioM.FernándezJ. S. (2004). Estrategias y actitudes de aculturación: La perspectiva de los inmigrantes y autóctonos en Almería.Almería: Junta de Andalucía.
35.
NavasM. S.GarcíaM.SánchezJ.RojasA.PumaresP.FernándezJ. (2005). The Relative Acculturation Extended Model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 21–37.
36.
NavasM. S.RojasA. J.GarcíaM.PumaresP. (2007). Acculturation strategies and attitudes according to the Relative Acculturation Extended Model (RAEM): The perspectives of natives versus immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 67–86.
37.
NesdaleD.MakA. S. (2003). Ethnic identification, self-esteem and immigrant psychological health. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 24–40.
38.
NgoB. (2008). Beyond “culture clash”. Understanding of immigrants experiences. Theory into Practice, 47, 4–11.
39.
NohS.KasperV. (2003). Perceived Discrimination and Depression: Moderating Effects of Coping, Acculturation, and Ethnic Support. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 232–238.
40.
NohS.BeiserM.KasperV.HouF.RummensJ. (1999). Perceived racial discrimination, depression and coping: A study of South Asian refugees in Canada. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 40, 193–207.
41.
ParkerI. (2004). Criteria for qualitative research in psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1: 95–106.
42.
PessarP. R.MahlerS. J. (2003). Transnational migration: Bringing gender in. International Migration Review, 37, 812–846.
43.
PhinneyJ. S.HorenczykG.LiebkindK.VedderP. (2001). Ethnic identity, immigration and well-being: An interactional perspective, Journal of Social Issues, 57, 493–510.
44.
PortesA.RumbautR. G. (2001). Conclusion—The forging of a new America: Lessons from theory and policy. InRumbautR. G.PortesA. (Eds.), Children of immigrants in America (pp. 301–318). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
45.
RosenthalD.RanieriN.KlimidisS. (1996). Vietnamese Adolescents in Australia: Relationships between Perceptions of Self and Parental Values, Intergenerational Conflict, and Gender Dissatisfaction. International Journal of Psychology, 31, 81–91.
46.
SegalU. A.MayadasN. S.ElliottD. (2006). A Framework for Immigration. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 4, 3–24.
47.
TangT. N.DionK. L. (1999). Gender and acculturation in relation to traditionalism: Perceptions of self and parents among Chinese students. Sex Roles, 41, 17–29
48.
TriandafyllidouA. (2000). The political discourse on immigration in southern Europe: A critical analysis. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 373–389.
49.
Van DijkT. A. (2003). Dominación étnica y racismo discursivo en España y América Latina.Barcelona: Gedisa. [Ethnic Dominance and Discoursive Racism in Spain and Latin America].
50.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.WardC.MasgoretA.-M. (2006). Patterns of relations between immigrants and host societies. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 637–651.
51.
WardC.BochnerS.FurnhamA. (2001). The psychology of culture shock (2nd edition). Hove, UK: Routledge.
52.
WertschJ. V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. InRogoffB.WertschJ. V. (Eds.), Children's learning in the “zone of proximal development” (pp. 7–18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
YehC. J.MaP. W.Madan-BahelA. (2005). The cultural negotiations of Korean immigrant youth. Journal of Counselling and Development, 83, 172–182.
