The objective of this study was to extend the channel model of flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975, 1990) by including self-efficacy as predictor of the challenges-skills combination, and of the flow experience itself, based on the predictions of social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1997, 2001). We conducted a two-wave longitudinal study among 258 secondary school teachers. Results, first, showed that the channel model of flow, including self-efficacy as antecedent of flow, fitted better the data. Secondly, it was observed that the more self-efficacy the more flow frequency and higher levels of challenge and skills which, in turn, predicted flow over time. Moreover, the influence of self-efficacy on flow over time was mediated by subjects' perception of the challenges and skills combination. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of integrating flow theory into the social cognitive theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkaikeH. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.
BakkerA. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 66, 26–44.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York, NY: Freeman.
5.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
6.
BanduraA. (2011). A social cognitive perspective on positive psychology. Revista de Psicología Social, 26, 7–20.
7.
BassiM.StecaP.Delle FaveA.CapraraG. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 301–312.
8.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. InBollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
BryceJ.HaworthJ. (2002). Well-being and flow in sample of male and female office workers. Leisure Studies, 21, 249–263.
10.
CapraraG. V.PastorelliC.RegaliaC.ScabiniE.BanduraA. (2005). Impact of filial self efficacy on quality of family functioning and satisfaction. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 71–97.
11.
CatleyD.DudaJ. L. (1997). Psychological antecedents of the frequency and intensity of flow in golfers. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28, 309–322.
12.
ChenH. (2006). Flow on the net-detecting web users positive affects and their flow states. Computers in Human Behaviour, 22, 221–233.
13.
ChenH.WigandR. T.NilanM. S. (2000). Exploring web users' optimal flow experiences. Information Technology & People, 13, 263–281.
14.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.New York: Harper & Row.
16.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life.New York: Basic Books.
17.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (2003). Good Business. Leadership, flow and the making of meaning.London: Coronet Books.
18.
CsikszentmihalyiM.CsikszentmihalyiI. S. (1988) Optimal experiences. Psychological studies of flow in consciousness.New York: Cambridge university Press.
19.
CsikszentmihalyiM.LarsonR. W.PrescottS. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activities and experiences. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 6, 281–294.
20.
CsikszentmihalyiM.LefevreJ. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815–822.
21.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK.WhalenS. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure.New York: Cambridge university Press.
22.
Delle FaveA.BassiM. (2000). The quality of experience in adolescents' daily lives: Developmental perspectives. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 347–367.
23.
Delle FaveA.MassiminiF. (2004). Parenthood and the quality of experience in daily life: A Longitudinal study. Social Indicators Research, 67, 75–106.
24.
DemeroutiE. (2006). Job characteristics, flow, and performance: The moderating role of conscientiousness. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 266–280.
25.
EisenbergerR.JonesJ. R.StiglhamberF.ShanockL.RandallA. T. (2005). Flow experiences at work: For high need achievers alone?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 755–775.
26.
GhaniJ. A.DeshpandeS. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction.The Journal of Psychology, 128, 381–391.
27.
GrauR.SalanovaM.PeiróJ. M. (2001). Moderating effects of self-efficacy on occupational stress. Psychology in Spain, 5, 63–74.
28.
HektnerJ.CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). A longitudinal exploration of flow and intrinsic motivation in adolescents. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City.
29.
HoyleR. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. InHoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling, concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
IversonR. D.MaguireC. (2000). The relationship between job and life satisfaction: Evidence from a remote mining community. Human Relations, 53, 807–839.
31.
JacksonS.A.EklundR. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 133–150.
32.
LlorensS.SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA.SalanovaM. (2004). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist?Computer in Human Behavior, 23, 825–841.
33.
MassiminiF.CarliM. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. InCsikszentmihalyiM.CsikszentmihalyiI. S. (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 288–318). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
MassiminiF.CsikszentmihalyiM.CarliM. (1987). The monitoring of optimal experience: A tool for psychiatric rehabilitation. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 545–549.
35.
MonetaG. B.CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64, 266–310.
36.
NakamuraJ.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2002). The concept of flow. InSnyderC. R.LopezS. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
NelsonD.SimmonsB. (2002). Healthy psychology and work stress: A more positive approach. InQuickJ. C.TetrickL. E. (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 97–119). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38.
NielsenK.ClealB. (2010). Predicting flow at work: Investigating the activities and job characteristics that predict flow states at work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 180–190.
39.
PittsS. C.WestS. G.TeinJ. Y. (1996). Longitudinal measurement models in evaluation research: Examining stability and change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19, 333–350.
40.
Rodríguez-sánchezA. M.CifreE.SalanovaM.ÅborgC. (2008). Technoflow among Spanish and Swedish students: A confirmatory factor multigroup analysis. Anales de Psicología, 24, 42–48.
41.
SalanovaM. (2008). Organizaciones saludables: una aproximación desde la psicología positiva [Healthy organizations: an approximation from positive psychology]. InVázquezC.HervásG. (Eds.), Psicología positiva: bases científicas del bienestar y la resiliencia (pp. 403–428). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
42.
SalanovaM.BakkerA.LlorensS. (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 1–22.
43.
SalanovaM.LlorensS.CifreE.MartínezI. M.SchaufeliW. B. (2003). Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups: An experimental study. Small Groups Research, 34, 43–73.
44.
SalanovaM.LlorensS.ShaufeliW. B. (2011). “Yes, I can, I feel good, and I just do it!” On gain cycles and spirals of efficacy beliefs, affect, and engagement. Applied Psycology: An International Review, 60, 255–285.
45.
SalanovaM.SchaufeliW. B.LlorensS.PeiróJ. M.GrauR. (2000). Desde el ‘burnout’ al ‘engagement’: ¿una nueva perspectiva? [From Burnout to Engagement: A new perspective?]. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 16, 117–134.
46.
SalanovaM.SchaufeliW. B.XanthopoulouD.BakkerA. (2009). The gain spiral of resources and work engagement. InBakkerA.LeiterM. (Eds.), Work engagement: Recent developments in theory and research (pp. 118–131). New York: Psychology Press.
47.
SawyerR. K. (2003). Group creativity. Music, theater, collaboration.Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48.
SchaufeliW. B.LeiterM. P.MaslachC.JacksonS. E. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory—General Survey. InMaslachC.JacksonS. E.LeiterM. P. (Eds.), The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Test Manual (3rd ed.) (pp. 12–26). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
49.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.González-romáV.BakkerA. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies3, 71–92.
