Although work-life ‘balance’ is an EU policy priority, within Europe there are considerable variations in the nature and extent of supports that national governments have offered to dual-earner families. In general, the Nordic welfare states offer the highest level of supports, although other countries, such as France, have historically offered extensive childcare supports to working mothers. We examine national variations in reported levels of work-life conflict, drawing upon questions fielded in the 2002 Family module International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) surveys for Britain, France, Finland, Norway and Portugal. We find evidence of a ‘societal effect’ in the cases of Finland and Norway, in that significantly lower levels of work-life conflict are reported in these countries even after a range of factors have been controlled for. However, support for childcare in France does not appear to have had a similar impact. Further explorations of the data reveal that the domestic division of labour is relatively traditional in France, and that this is associated with higher levels of work-life conflict.
Anttonen, A. (2002) ‘Universalism and Social Policy: A Nordic-feminist Revaluation, NORA10: 71-80.
2.
Berg, P. A., Kalleberg, L. and Appelbaum, E. (2003) ‘Balancing Work and Family: the Role of High-Commitment Environments’, Industrial Relations42: 168-187.
3.
Burchell, B., Ladipo, D. and Wilkinson, F. (eds) (2002) Job Insecurity and Work Intensification. London: Routledge.
4.
COM (2007) ‘Employment and Social Policies: A Framework for Investing in Quality’, Brussels 20 June.
5.
Crompton, R. (ed.) (1999) Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
Crompton, R. and Le Feuvre, N. (2000) ‘Gender, Family and Employment in Comparative Perspective: the Realities and Representations of Equal Opportunities in Britain and France’, Journal of European Social Policy10: 334-348.
7.
Journal of European Social Policy10: 334-348.
8.
Davis, J. A. and Jowell, R. (1989) ‘Measuring National Differences’, in R. Jowell, S. Witherspoon and L. Brook (eds) British Social Attitudes: Special International Report. Aldershot: Gower.
9.
Dench, S., Aston, J., Evans, C., Meager, N., Williams, M. and Willison, R. (2002) Key Indicators of Women’s Position in Britain. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
10.
Department of Trade and Industry (2000) Work and Parents: Competitiveness and Choice. London: Stationery Office.
11.
Department of Trade and Industry/HM Treasury (2003) Balancing Work and Family Life: Enhancing Choice and Support for Parents. London: Stationery Office.
12.
Dex, S. and Walters, P. (1989) ‘Women’s Occupational Status in Britain, France and the USA: Explaining the Difference’, Industrial Relations Journal20: 203-212.
13.
Einhorn, B. (1993) Cinderella Goes to Market. London: Verso.
14.
Ellingsaeter, A. L. (2003) ‘The Complexity of Family Policy Reform: the Case of Norway’, European Societies5: 419-443.
15.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A. and Myles, J. (2002) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
Folbre, N. (1994) Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. London: Routledge.
19.
Gallie, D. (2003) ‘The Quality of Working Life: Is Scandinavia Different?’European Sociological Review19: 61-79.
20.
Gershuny, J. and Sullivan, O. (2003) ‘Time Use, Gender and Public Policy Regimes’, Social Politics10: 205-228.
21.
Glucksmann, M. (1995) ‘Why “Work”? Gender and the “Total Social Organisation of Labour”’, Gender Work and Organisation2: 63-75.
22.
Gornick, J. C. and Meyers, M. K. (2003) Families That Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23.
Gregory, A. and Windebank, J. (2000) Women’s Work in Britain and France. Houndmills: Macmillan.
24.
Hantrais, L. (1993) ‘Women Work and Welfare in France’, in J. Lewis (ed.) Women and Social Policies in Europe. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
25.
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26.
Hernes, H. (1987) Welfare State and Woman Power. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
27.
Jenson, J. (1986) ‘Gender and Reproduction’, Studies in Political Economy20: 9-46.
28.
Jowell, R., Brook, L. and Dowds, L. (1993) International Social Attitudes. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
29.
Korpi, W. (2000) ‘Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States’, Social Politics7: 127-191.
30.
Leira, A. (1992) Welfare States and Working Mothers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Leira, A. (2002) Working Parents and the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Lewis, J. (1992) ‘Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy2: 159-173.
33.
Lewis, J. (2001) ‘Women, Men and the Family’, in A. Seddon (ed.) The Blair Effect. London: Little, Brown and Company.
34.
Lyonette, C., Crompton, R. and Wall, K. (2005) ‘Gender, Occupational Class and Work-Life Conflict: a Comparison of Britain and Portugal’, paper presented at the Gender, Work and Organisation Conference in Keele (23rd June).
35.
Maurice, M., Sellier, F. and Silvestre, J. J. (1986) The Social Foundations of Industrial Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Moen, P. (ed.) (2003) It’s About Time: Couples and Careers. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
37.
Moss, P. (1991) ‘Day Care for Young Children in the United Kingdom’, in Melhuish and Moss (eds) Day Care for Young Children. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
38.
OECD (2001) ‘Balancing Work and Family Life: Helping Parents into Paid Employment’, Chapter 4, Employment Outlook.
39.
Pateman, C. (1989) ‘The Patriarchal Welfare State’, in C. Pateman (ed.) The Disorder of Women. Cambridge: Polity Press.
40.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (1999) ‘The Modernization of Family and Motherhood in Western Europe’, in R. Crompton (ed.) Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
Roehling, P. V., Moen, P. and Batt, R. (2003) ‘Spillover’, in P. Moen (ed.) It’s About Time: Couples and Careers. Ithaca, NY and London: ILR Press.
42.
Taylor, R. (2001) The Future of Work-Life Balance. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.
43.
Vala, J., Villaverde, M., Cabral, M. and Ramos, A. (2003) Valores sociais: mudancas e contrastes em Portugal e na Europa. Imprensa de Ciencias Sociais, Lisbon.
44.
White, M., Hill, S., McGovern, P., Mills, C. and Smeaton, D. (2003) ‘“High-Performance” Management Practices, Working Hours and Work-Life Balance’, British Journal of Industrial Relations41: 175-195.
45.
Windebank, J. (2001) ‘Dual-Earner Couples in Britain and France’, Work Employment and Society15: 269-290.
