From Level of Aspiration to Cognitive Dissonance,or,What the Middle Class Worries About

Abstract

Social psychological theory has to a large extent been the psycho logy of the 'social' and not the sociological explaination of psycho logical phenomena and processes. In this article we attempt an analysis of the societal conditions seen as the neglected context of social psychological theories ranging from level of aspiration to cognitive dissonance. Three reasons for the choice of these theories are given (1) the author's own research in the field, (2) the coherence in these theoretical frameworks, and (3) the neglect of the societal relevance of the processes studied.

A main thesis is that the people who developed these theories be lieved they were about human beings in general. when they reflected the problems of an academic middle class in a highly competitive social setting, in which man is viewed as the sole proprietor of his capacities which he tries to exchange on the academic market place for a fair remuneration. The ideology of individualistic and competi tive liberalism is implicit in all these mentioned psychological theo ries. They are assumed as 'natural' and accepted without reflexion. Had this pre-theoretical bias been understood by those who devel oped the psychological theories their worries would have been different and their theories may have had a critical function and therefore an impact on society. The article therefore is not so , much a criticism of social psychological theories, as an attempt at criticism of ideology.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asplund, J. , Dreier, O. & Mørch, S. 'Socialpsykologi og social integration', Udkast, 1975, No. 1, pp. 3-45.

Brehm, J. & Cohen, A.R. Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance, Wiley, New York 1962.

Cartwright, D. & Zander, A. Group Dynamics (2nd ed.), Harper & Row, New York 1960.

Cohen, A.R. & Zimbardo, P.G. 'Dissonance and the Need to Avoid Failure', in P. G. Zimbardo (Ed.), The Cognitive Control of Motivation, Scott, Foresman & Co., Glenview 1969.

Feldman, S. (Ed.). Cognitive Consistency, Academic Press, New York 1966.

Festinger, L.A. Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press , Stanford 1957.

Festinger, L. 'A Theory of Social Comparison Processes', Human Relations , Vol. 7 (1954), pp. 117-140.

Festinger, L. 'Informal Social Communication', Psych. Review, Vol. 57 (1950), pp. 271-282.

Festinger, L. , Schachter, S. & Back, K. Social Pressures in Informal Groups, Harper & Row, New York 1950.

10.

Hare, A.P. Handbook of Small Group Research, The Free Press , New York 1962.

11.

Heider, F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York 1958.

12.

Israel, J. Alienation: From Marx to Modern Sociology, Alyn & Bacon , Boston 1971.

13.

Israel, J. Foundations of a Dialectical Social Science (forthcoming).

14.

Israel, J. 'Is a Non-Normative Social Science Possible?' Acta Sociologica, 1972.

15.

Israel, J. Self-Evaluation and Rejection in Groups, Almquist & Wiksell, Uppsala 1956.

16.

Israel, J. 'Stipulation and Construction in the Social Science', in J. Israel & H. Tajfel , The Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment , Academic Press, London 1972.

17.

Israel, J. 'Alienation and Reification', in R. F. Geyer & D. R. Schweitzer (Eds.), Theories of Alienation - Critical Perspectives in Philosophy and the Social Sciences, M. Nijhoff, The Hague 1976.

18.

Lewin, V. , Dembo, T. , Festinger, L. & Sears, P.S. 'Levels of Aspirations', in T. McHunt , (Ed.), Personality and the Behavior Disorders (Vol. 1), Ronald Press, New York 1944.

19.

Macpherson, C.B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, Oxford University Press, London 1962.

20.

Mead, G.H. Mind, Self, Society, University of Chicago Press , Chicago 1962.

21.

Moscovici, S. 'Society and Theory in Social Psychology', in J. Israel , & H. Tajfel , The Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment, Academic Press, London 1972.

22.

Rotter, J.B. 'Level of Aspiration as a Method of Studying Personality: A Critical Review of Methodology', Psych. Review 49, pp. 463-474.

23.

Zimbardo, P. G. (Ed.), The Cognitive Control of Motivation, Scott, Foresman & Co., Glenview 1969.

24.

Zinkernagel, P. Conditions of Description, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1956.