How can we explain exceptional advancement by disadvantaged immigrants' children? Extending segmented assimilation theory, this article traces the structural and relational attributes of high schools attended by young adults who reached their late twenties in 2000. Hypotheses are derived from theories in sociology of education and tested with four waves of data from the National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS). The authors offer three major findings. First, an overwhelming majority of disadvantaged students attend public schools; some relational attributes are typical in public schools attended by disadvantaged students. Second, children's upward mobility is shaped by the structural and relational attributes of their high schools. Most school effects are the same for disadvantaged and advantaged youngsters, and student-educator bonds and curriculum structure have even stronger positive effects for the disadvantaged. Finally, mobility patterns differ widely among Chinese, Mexicans, and whites. Mexicans are less likely to be exposed to favorable school attributes.
Adelman, Clifford.1999. Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment. Washington, DC: National Institute on Postsecondary Education, Libraries, and Lifelong Learning, U.S. Department of Education.
2.
---. 2006. The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education .
3.
Bryk, Anthony S., and Mary E. Driscoll .1988. The school as community: Theoretical foundations, contextual influences, and consequences for students and teachers. Madison: National Center on Effective Secondary Schools, University of Wisconsin.
4.
Bryk, Antonia, Valerie E. Lee, and Peter Blakeley Holland.1993. Catholic school and the common good. Boston: Harvard University Press.
5.
Elder, Glen H., Jr.1998. The life course as developmental theory. Child Development69 (1): 1-12.
6.
Featherman, D.L., and R. Hauser.1978. Opportunity and change. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Grogger, Jeff, and Eric Eide.1995. Changes in college skills and the rise in the college wage premium. Journal of Human Resources30:280-310.
8.
Hao, Lingxin, and Melissa Bonstead-Bruns.1998. Parent-child difference in educational expectations and academic achievement of immigrant and native students. Sociology of Education71:175-98.
9.
Hoffer, Thomas, Andrew M. Greeley, and James S. Coleman .1985. Achievent growth in public and Catholic schools. Sociology of Education58:74-97.
10.
Huggett, Mark, Gustavo Ventura, and Amir Yaron.2007. Sources of lifetime inequality. NBER Working Paper no. W13224, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
11.
Kao, Grace, and Marta Tienda.1995. Optimism and achievement: the educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly76 (1): 1-19.
12.
Lee, V.E., and A.S. Bryk.1988. Curriculum tracking as mediating the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education61:78-94.
13.
Lee, Valerie E., and Julia B. Smith .1993. Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education66:164-87.
14.
---. 1996. Collective responsibility for learning and its effects on gains in achievement for early secondary school students. American Journal of Education104:103-47.
15.
Lee, V.E., J.B. Smith, and R.G. Croninger.1997. How high school organization influences the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education70:128-50.
16.
Lucas, Samuel Roundfield.1999. Tracking inequality: stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
Lucas, Samuel R., and Mark Berends.2002. Sociodemographic diversity, correlated achievement, and de facto tracking. Sociology of Education75:328-48.
18.
Morgan, Stephen L.2001. Counterfactuals, causal effect heterogeneity, and the Catholic school effect on learning. Sociology of Education74:341-74.
19.
National Association of Secondary School Principals.1996. Breaking ranks: Changing an American institution . Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
20.
Oakes, J.1985. Keeping track: How schools structure inequality . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
Pallas, Aaron M., Doris R. Entwisle, Karl L. Alexander, and M. Francis Stluka .1994. Ability-group effects: Instructional, social, or institutional?Sociology of Education67:27-46.
22.
Perlmann, Joel.2005. Italians then, Mexicans now: Immigrant origins and second-generation progress, 1890 to 2000. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
23.
Pong, Suet-ling, and Lingxin Hao .2007. Neighborhood and school factors in the school performance of immigrants' children. International Migration Review41 (1): 206-41.
24.
Portes, Alejandro, and Patricia Fernández-Kelly.2008. No margin for error: Educational and occupational achievement among disadvantaged children of immigrants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science620:12-36.
25.
Portes, Alejandro, and Dag MacLeod .1996. Educational progress of children of immigrants: The roles of class, ethnicity, and school context . Sociology of Education69:255-75.
26.
Portes, Alejandro, and Ruben G. Rumbaut .2001. The legacies. Berkeley: University of California Press; and New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
Portes, Alejandro, and Min Zhou.1993. The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530:74-96.
28.
Rosenholtz, Susan J.1991. Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools . New York: Longman.
29.
Royston, P.2004. Multiple imputation of missing values. The Stata Journal4 (3): 227-41.
30.
Rubin, D.B.1987. Multiple imputation for non-response in surveys . New York: John Wiley.
31.
Schneider, Barbara L., Adam E. Wyse, and Venessa Keesler .2006-2007. Is small really better? Testing some assumptions about high school size. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, pp. 15-47. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution.
32.
Stanton-Salazar, R., and Sanford M. Dornbusch .1995. Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students . Sociology of Education68 (2): 116-35.
33.
Stevenson, David L., Kathryn S. Schiller, and Barbara Schneider .1994. Sequences of opportunities for learning. Sociology of Education67:184-98.
34.
U.S. Department of Education.2004. The impacts of regular upward bound: Results from the third follow-up data collection. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
35.
Zhou, Min, and Carl L. Bankston III.1998. Growing up American: How Vietnamese children adapt to life in the United States . New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
36.
Zhou, Min, Jennifer Lee, Jody Agius Vallejo, Rosaura Tafoya-Estrada, and Yan Sao Xiong .2008. Success attained, deterred, and denied: Divergent pathways to social mobility in Los Angeles's new second generation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science620:37-61.
