European policy and discourse create crosscurrents for fathers: the promotion of work-family balance (WFB) and more involved fathering versus work-focused competitiveness and productivity goals in globalized economies. Using Amartya Sen's capabilities and agency paradigm, the authors provide a theoretical framework for analyzing agency inequalities in WFB: the disjuncture between norms/values and practices and between policies and fathers' capabilities to exercise them. The authors apply the capability framework to comparative European data considering working times and desired working times, flexibility and autonomy in employment, as well as perceptions of economic security and job security. The authors find differences in fathers' capabilities and agency for WFB across countries representing different welfare regime configurations, most strikingly between old and new EU member states. The majority of the European fathers wanted to reduce working hours substantially despite possible reductions in pay, underscoring the value of the capabilities framework for understanding potential freedoms for achieving WFB.
Agarwal, B., J. Humphries, and I. Robeyns.2003. Exploring the challenges of Amartya Sen's work and ideas: An introduction. Feminist Economics9 (2/3): 3-12.
2.
Becker, Gary S.1991. A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Bergman, H., and B. Hobson.2002. Compulsory fatherhood: The coding of fatherhood in Sweden. In Making men into fathers: Men, masculinities and the social politics of fatherhood, ed B. Hobson.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Blossfield, H.-P., and S. Drobenic.2001. Careers of couples in contemporary society . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
Carson, M.2004. From common market to social Europe? Paradigm shift and institutional change in European Union policy on food, asbestos and chemicals, and gender equality. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wicksell.
6.
Crompton, R.1999. Restructuring gender relations and employment: The decline of the male breadwinner. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
---. 2006. Employment and the family: The reconfiguration of work and family in contemporary societies. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
8.
Crompton, R., and F. Harris.1998. Explaining women's employment patterns: "Orientations to work" revisited. British Journal of Sociology49 (1): 118-36.
9.
Doucet, A.2006. Do men mother?Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
10.
Duncan, S.2005. Mothering, class and rationality. Sociological Review51 (1): 51-76.
11.
Duvendak, J. W., and M. Stavenuiter , eds. 2004. Working fathers, caring men. The Hauge, the Netherlands: Verwey-Jonker Institute .
12.
Esping-Andersen, G.1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
13.
Fagan, C.2004. Gender and working-time in industrialized countries: Practices and preferences.' In Finding the balance: Working-time and workers' needs and preferences in industrialized countries, ed. J. Messenger.London: Routledge.
14.
European Expert Group on Gender, Social Exclusion and Employment (EGGSIE).2005. "Reconciliation of work and private life: A comparative review of thirty European Countries". Luxembourg: European Commission.
15.
Fagan, C., L. McDowell, D. Perrons, K. Ray, and K. Ward.2008. Class differences in mothers' work schedules and assessments of their "work-life balance" in dual-earner couples in Britain . In Women and employment: Changing lives and new challenges , ed. J. Scott, S. Dex, and H. Joshi , 199-212. Cheltenham , UK: Edward Elgar.
16.
Gavanas, A., and F. Williams.2008. The intersection of child care regimes and migration regimes: A three-country study. In H. Lutz (Ed.), Migration and Domestic Work: a European Perspective on a Global Theme, 13-28. London, Routledge.
17.
Ginn, J., S. Arber, J. Brannen, A. Dale, S. Dex, and P. Elias.1996. Feminist fallacies: A reply to Hakim on women's employment. British Journal of Sociology47 (1): 167-74.
18.
Gornick, J.C., and M.C. Meyers.2003. Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
Haas, L., K. Allard, and P. Hwang.2002. The impact of organizational culture on men's use of parental leave in Sweden. Community, Work and Family5 (3): 319-42.
20.
Hakim, C.2000. Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: preference theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
---. (2006). Women, careers, and work-life preferences. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 34(3): 279-296.
22.
Hall, P., and D. Sockice , eds. 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
Hobson, B., A.-Z. Duvander, and K. Halldén.2007. Men and women's agency and capabilities to create a worklife balance in diverse and changing institutional contexts . In Children, family policies and welfare state change, ed. J. Lewis.Cheltenham , UK: Edward Elgar.
24.
Hobson, B., S. Fahlén, and L. Cottrell.2007. Capabilities and agency in WFB: Theoretical and empirical challenges. Background and conceptual Paper for WO2: Pilot survey, RECWOWE Conference, Warsaw , Poland, June 12-16. http://recwowe.vitamib.com/papers-deliverables/papers-2/wp02/ploneexfile.2007-07-12.7819448790.
25.
Hobson, B., and D. Morgan.2002. Introduction: Making men into fathers . In Making men into fathers: Men, masculinities and the social politics of fatherhood, ed. B. Hobson.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Hobson, B., and L. Oláh.2006. Birthstrikes? Agency and capabilities in the reconciliation of employment and family. Journal of Marriage and the Family Review39 (3-4): 197-227.
27.
Iversen, V.2003. Intra-household inequality: A challenge for the capability approach? Feminist Economics9 (2/3): 93-116.
28.
Knijn, T., and M. Kremer.1997. Gender and the caring dimension of welfare states: Toward inclusive citizenship. Social Politics4 (3): 328-61.
29.
Korpi, W.2000. Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics7 (2): 127-91.
30.
Lewis, J., and S. Guillari.2005. The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: The search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. Economy and Society34 (1): 76-104.
31.
Lewis, J., T. Knijn, C. Martin, and O. Osner.2009. Patterns of development in work/family reconciliation policies for parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK in the 2000s. Social Politics, forthcoming.
32.
McDonald, P.2000. Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility . Journal of Population Research17 (1): 1-16.
33.
Oecd.1999. Employment outlook . www.oecd.org/els/employment/outlook/downloadhttp://www.oecd.org/document/62/0,3343,en_2649_33927_31935102_1_1_1_1,00.html.
---. n.d. Family database. In Babies and bosses-Reconciling work and family life, vol. 5, A synthesis of findings for OECD countries. www.oecd.org/els/social/family.
36.
Perrons, D., C. Fagan , L. McDowell, K. Ray, and K. Ward, eds. 2006. Gender divisions and working time in the new economy: Changing patterns of work, care and public policy in Europe and North America . Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar .
37.
Pfau-Effinger, B.2005. Culture and welfare state policies: Reflections on a complex interaction. Social Policy34 (1): 1-18.
38.
Plantenga, J., J. Schippers and J. Siegers1999. "Towards an Equal Division of Paid and Unpaid Work: The Case of the Netherlands." Journal of European Social Policy9:99-110.
Sen, A.1992. Inequality re-examined. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
41.
---. 1999. Development as Freedom.Oxford: Oxford University Press
42.
---. 2003. Capability and well-being. In The quality of life, ed. M. Nussbaum and A. Sen, 30-53. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
---. 2006. Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life, 9-30. Oxford: OUP (reprinted from 1993 publication).
44.
Smith, A.J.2004. Who cares? European fathers and the time they spend looking after children. Sociology Working Papers, 2004-05, Oxford University, UK.
45.
Standing, G.1996. Social protection in eastern central Europe: A tale of slipping anchors and torn safety nets. In Welfare states and transitions, ed. G. Esping-Andersen, 225-55. London : Sage.
46.
Van der Lippe, T., and P. Peters.2007. Competing claims in work and family life. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar .
47.
Walker, R., R. Goodwin, and E. Cornwall.2000. Work patterns in Europe and related social security issues. In Changing work patterns and social security, ed. D. Pieters, 5-43. London : EISS Yearbook.
48.
Weismann, S.M., H. Boejie, A. Van Doorne Huiskes, and L. Den Dulk . Forthcoming. Not worth mentioning? The implicit and explicit nature of decision-making about the division of (housework). Community, Work and Family.
