Recently, attempts have been made to employ American trait psychology across cultures. From the perspective of contemporary psychological anthropology, these efforts appear likely to repeat certain fallacies of the culture and personality approach of the 1930s, such as the reification of concepts into causal entities and the use of mean scores to characterize and compare populations (and even nations). These dangers are noted, and some recent developments in psychological anthropology are briefly discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benedict, R. (1934). Patterns of culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
Bock, P. K. (1967). Love magic, menstrual taboos, and the facts of geography. American Anthropologist, 69, 213-217.
3.
Bock, P. K. (1970). Culture shock. New York: Knopf.
4.
Bock, P. K. (Ed.). (1994). Handbook of psychological anthropology. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
5.
Bock, P. K. (1999). Rethinking psychological anthropology (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
6.
Church, A. T. , & Katigbak, M. S. (2000). Trait psychology in the Philippines. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 73-94.
7.
D'Andrade, R. G. (1985). Character terms and cultural models. In J.W.D. Dougherty (Ed.), Directions in cognitive anthropology (pp. 321-343). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
8.
D'Andrade, R. G. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
D'Andrade, R. G. , & Strauss, C. (1992). Human motives and cultural models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Gladwin, T. , & Sarason, S. (1953). Truk: Man in paradise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption. New York: Free Press.
13.
Hollan, D. (1992). Cross-cultural differences in the self. Journal of Anthropological Research, 48, 283-300.
14.
Huang, C. D. , Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. (1997). Identifying cultural differences in traits. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 192-218.
15.
Inkeles, A. (1996). National character: A psycho-social study. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
16.
Kaplan, B. (1954). A study of Rorschach responses in four cultures (Papers of the Peabody Museum, No. 42). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
17.
Krake, W. (1978). Force and persuasion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Leary, T. F. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald.
19.
Lutz, C. (1988). Unnatural emotions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Mandler, G. (1997). Human nature explored. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Marsella, A. J. , Dubanoski, J., Hamada, W. C., & Morse, H. (2000). The measurement of personality across cultures: Historical, conceptual, and methodological issues and considerations. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 41-62.
22.
McClelland, D. (1967). The achieving society. New York: Free Press.
23.
McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
24.
Nuckolls, C. W. (1998). Culture: A problem that cannot be solved. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
25.
Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Rosaldo, M. (1980). Knowledge and passion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Wallace, A.F.C. (1952). The modal personality of the Tuscarora Indians as revealed by the Rorschach test (Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin No. 150). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
28.
Wallace, A.F.C. (1961). Culture and personality. New York: Random House.
29.
Whiting, J.W.M. , & Child, I. L. (1953). Child training and personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
Whiting, J.W.M. , Kluckhohn, R., & Anthony, A. (1958). The function of male initiation ceremonies at puberty. In E. Maccoby, T. Newcomb, & E. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 359-370). New York: Holt.
