This study illuminates aspects of social life within agencies designed to house homeless adolescents through research conducted at a live-in, emergency youth shelter. The shelter provides physical necessities, safety, life skills, and a “consistent” social environment through its operationas a quasi-total institution. Social life within the shelter is characterized by constant negotiation of the curricular imposition of “structure.” External boundaries become more or less permeable as a result of the degrees to which shelter residents and staff challenge or conform to rules meant to define them. Shelter curriculum may be critiqued for treating adolescent homelessness as an individual rather than social problem, where rules simultaneously emphasize the modification of individual behaviors and serve as social control mechanisms. Shelter residents, whose poverty and homelessness are only marginally connected to personal behaviors or choices, mount (at times) conscious opposition to rules sanctioning their personal freedoms and access to the outside world.
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In L. Althusser (Ed.), Lenin and philosophy (pp. 127-186). New York: Monthly Review Press.
2.
Altschuler, A. (1999). Sheltering and shielding care (Working Paper No. 6). Berkeley: Center for Working Families, University of California.
3.
Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162, 67-92.
4.
Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
Apple, M. (1982). Cultural and economic reproduction in education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
6.
Archer, C., Pratt, S. D., & Phillips, D. (2001). Working class men’s constructions of masculinity of negotiations of (non)participation in higher education. Gender and Education, 13, 431-491.
7.
Armaline, W., Farber, K., & Nelson-Rowe, S. (1994). Education and knowledge: Reading class: Marxist theories of education. In P. McGuire & D. Mcquarie (Eds.), From the Left Bank to the mainstream: Historical debates and contemporary research in Marxist sociology (pp. 178-206). Dixie Hills, NY: General Hall.
8.
Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. (1985). Education under siege. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.
9.
Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. (1991). Postmodern education: Politics, culture, and social criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
Becker, H. S. (1958). Problems of inference and proof in participant observation. American Sociological Review, 23, 652-660.
11.
Becker, H. S. (1973). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
12.
Berrick, J. (1995). In search of respect. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Carnoy, M., & Levin, H. (1985). Schooling and work in the democratic state. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
Code, L. (1995). How do we know? Questions of method in feminist practice. In S. Burt & L. Code (Eds.), Changing methods: Feminists transforming practice (pp. 13-44). Ontario, Canada: Broadview Press.
15.
Cook, J. A., & Fonow, M. M. (1990). Knowledge and women’s interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. In J. McCarl Nielson (Ed.), Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences (pp. 69-93). Boulder, CO: Westview.
16.
Eder, D., & Corsaro, W. (1999). Ethnographic studies of children and youth: Theoretical and ethical issues. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28, 521-531.
17.
Emerson, R. M. (2001). Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
18.
Francis, B. (1999). Lads, lasses, and (new) labour: 14-16-year-old students’ responses to the “laddish” behavior and boys’ underachievement debate. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 355-371.
19.
Garey, A. (2002). Social domains and concepts of care: Protection, instruction, and containment in after-school programs. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 769-788.
20.
Giroux, H. (1983). Theory and resistance in education. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.
21.
Glasser, I., & Bridgeman, R. (1999). Braving the street: The anthropology of homelessness. New York: Berghahn Books.
22.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
23.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
25.
Heyl, B. (2001). Ethnographic interviewing. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Loffland, & L. Loffland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 369-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Horowitz, R. (1983). Honor and the American dream. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
27.
Horowitz, R. (1995). Teen mothers: Citizens or dependents?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Horowitz, R. (1997). Barriers and bridges to class mobility and formation. Sociological Methods and Research: Ethnographies of Stratification, 25, 495-538.
29.
Kivett, D., & Warren, C. (2002). Social control in a group home for delinquent boys. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 31, 3-32.
30.
Liebow, E. (1993). Tell them who I am. New York: Penguin.
31.
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
32.
MacLeod, J. (1995). Ain’t no makin’it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview.
33.
McLaren, P. (1989). Life in schools. White Plains, NY: Longman.
34.
McLaren, P. (1997). Revolutionary multiculturalism: Pedagogies of dissent for the new millennium. Boulder, CO: Westview.
35.
Naples, N. (2003). Feminism and method: Ethnography, discourse analysis, and activist research. New York: Routledge.
36.
Neubeck, K., & Cazenave, N. (2001). Welfare racism: Playing the race card against America’s poor. New York: Routledge.
37.
Roberts, D. (2002). Shattered bonds. New York: Basic Civitas Books.
38.
Snow, D., & Anderson, L. (1993). Down on their luck: A study of homeless street people. Berkeley: University of California Press.
39.
Spring, J. (1972). Education and the rise of the corporate state. Boston: Beacon.
40.
Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
41.
Valentine, B. (1978). Hustling and other hard work. New York: Macmillan.
42.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: Why working class kids get working class jobs. Westmead, England: Saxon House, Teakfield.
43.
Young, A. A. (1999). The (non)accumulation of capital: Explicating the relationship of structure and agency in the lives of poor Black men. Sociological Theory, 17, 201-227.
