The phenomenon of statistical discrimination may take on increasing importance in the future as “traditional” prejudice-based discrimination slowly fades. This article considers how statistical discrimination compares with perspectives on discrimination in sociology, economics, and law. Statistical discrimination fits well with mainstream perspectives in economics, suggesting it is likely to be a common practice and endure even as racial prejudice declines. Statistical discrimination is less central in sociological perspectives on discrimination because they tend to focus on prejudice-based discrimination, ethnic conflict and stratification, and how ethnic group interests are embedded in social institutions. In the area of law, statistical discrimination is treated differently in different situations—sometimes allowable, other times prohibited. The authors note some characteristics of statistical discrimination that set it apart from other forms of discrimination and consider whether standard policies aimed at reducing racial discrimination in employment are likely to be effective in combating statistical discrimination.
Age Discrimination and Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621.
2.
Aigner, D. J., & Cain, G. (1977). Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 30, 175-187.
3.
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101.
4.
Arizona Governing Committee v. Norris, 463 U.S. 1073 (1983).
5.
Arrow, K. (1972). Some mathematical models of race discrimination in the labor market. In A. Pascal (Ed.), Racial discrimination in economic life (pp. 197-203). Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.
6.
Arrow, K. (1973). The theory of discrimination. In O. Ashenfelter & A. Rees (Eds.), Discrimination in labor markets (pp. 3-33). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Arrow, K. (1998). What has economics to say about racial discrimination?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 91-100.
8.
Ayres, I., & Siegelman, P. (1995). Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. American Economic Review, 85, 304-321.
9.
Becker, G. (1957). The economics of discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Benston, G. J. (1983). Discrimination and economic efficiency in employee fringe benefits. University of Chicago Law Review, 50, 250-279.
11.
Bergmann, B. (1986). The economic emergence of women. New York: Basic Books.
12.
Board of Trustees of Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356 (2001).
13.
Borjas, G., & Goldberg, M. (1978). Biased screening and discrimination in the labor market. American Economic Review, 68, 918-922.
14.
Brewer, M., & Kramer, R. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219-243.
15.
Burstein, P. (1990). Intergroup conflict, law, and the concept of labor market discrimination. Sociological Forum, 5, 459-476.
16.
Burstein, P. (Ed.). (1994). Equal employment opportunity: Labor market discrimination and public policy. New York: Walter De Gruyter.
17.
Cain, G. (1986). The economic analysis of labor market discrimination. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), The handbook of labor economics (pp. 693-785). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
18.
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e.
19.
Department of Ins. vs. Insurance Servs. Office, 434 So. 2d 908 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983), petition denied, 444 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 1984).
20.
England, P. (1994). Neoclassical economists’ theories of discrimination. In P. Burstein (Ed.), Equal employment opportunity: Labor market discrimination and public policy (pp.59-70). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
21.
Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 28 U.S.C. § 2601.
22.
Feagin, J., & Eckberg, D. (1980). Discrimination: Motivation, action, effects, and context. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 1-20.
23.
Gaulding, J. (1995). Race, sex, and genetic discrimination in insurance: What’s fair?Cornell Law Review, 80, 1646-1694.
24.
Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971).
25.
Hamilton, D. (1981). Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Hamilton, D., & Sherman, J. (1994). Stereotypes. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 2., pp. 1-68) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Hylton, K. N., & Rougeau, V. D. (1996). Lending discrimination: Economic theory, econometric evidence, and the community reinvestment act. Georgetown Law Journal, 85, 237-292.
28.
Hylton, M. O. (1995). Insurance risk classifications after McGann: Managing risk efficiently in the shadow of the ADA. Baylor Law Review, 47, 59-95.
29.
Insurance Servs. Office v. Commissioner of Ins., 381 So. 2d 515, 517 (La. Ct. App. 1979).
30.
Jaret, C. (1995). Contemporary racial and ethnic relations. New York: HarperCollins.
31.
Jerry, R., & Mansfield, K. (1985). Justifying unisex insurance: Another perspective. American University Law Review, 34, 330-365.
32.
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 (2000).
33.
Kirschenman, J., & Neckerman, K. (1991). “We’d love to hire them, but...”: The meaning of race for employers. In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 203-232). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
34.
Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Crown.
35.
Ladd, H. F. (1998). Evidence on discrimination in mortgage lending. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 41-62.
36.
Levin, J., & Levin, W. (1982). The functions of discrimination and prejudice (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
37.
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978).
38.
Lundberg, S., & Startz, R. (1983). Private discrimination and social intervention in competitive labor markets. American Economic Review, 73, 340-347.
39.
Mackie, D. M., Hamilton, D. L., Susskind, J., & Rosselli, F. (1996). Social psychological foundations of stereotype formation. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 41-78). New York: Guilford.
40.
Mackie, M. (1973). Arriving at the truth by definition: The case of stereotype inaccuracy. Social Problems, 20, 431-447.
41.
McCauley, C. R., Stitt, C. L., & Segal, M. (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 195-208.
42.
Moss, P., & Tilly, C. (2001). Stories employers tell: Race, skill, and hiring in America. New York: Russell Sage.
43.
Munnell, A. H., Tootell, G., Browne, L. E., & McEneaney, J. (1996). Mortgage lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA data. American Economic Review, 86, 25-53.
44.
Neckerman, K. M., & Kirschenman, J. (1991). Hiring strategies, racial bias and inner-city workers. Social Problems, 38, 801-815.
45.
Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs, 123 S. Ct. 1972 (2003).
46.
Phelps, E. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62, 659-661.
47.
Schwab, S. (1986). Is statistical discrimination efficient?American Economic Review, 76, 228-234.
48.
Skrentny, J. D. (1994). Pragmatism, institutionalism, and the construction of employment discrimination. Sociological Forum, 9, 343-369.
49.
Telles v. Commissioner of Ins., 574 N.E. 2d 359 (Mass. 1991).
50.
Tootell, G. (1996). Redlining in Boston: Do mortgage lenders discriminate against neighborhoods?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 1049-1079.
51.
Wortham, L. (1986). Insurance classification: Too important to be left to the actuaries. University of Michigan Journal of Law, 19, 349-423.
52.
Yinger, J. (1998). Evidence on discrimination in consumer markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 23-40.
