Mathematics education is linked to modern technological advancement, citizenship, and matters of political economy. Access to quality mathematics teachers can have a profound influence on African American males. This article focuses on several salient issues related to the question “What is a qualified teacher?” In particular, the article describes common concerns and challenges associated with teacher quality and the advancement of African American males and other traditionally under served demographic groups in mathematics.
American Mathematical Society. (2000). The mathematical education of teachers. Providence, RI : Author.
2.
Bowen, W.G., & Bok, D. (1999). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
4.
Carnevale, A.P., & Desrochers, D.M. (2003). Standards for what? The economic roots of K-16 reform. Washington, DC: Educational Testing Service.
5.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). The problem of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 295-299.
6.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). Inequality and access to knowledge. In J. A. Banks & C. A. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 465-483). New York: Macmillan.
7.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future.
8.
deMello, V., & Broughman, S. (1996). 1993-1994 schools and staffing survey: Selected states results. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
9.
Denbo, S. J., & Beaulieu, L. M. (Eds.). (2002). Improving schools for African American students. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
10.
Devault, M.V., & Weaver, J.F. (1970). Forces and issues related to curriculum and instruction, K-6. In A. F. Coxford & P. S. Jones (Eds.), A history of mathematics education in the United States and Canada (pp. 92-152). Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
11.
Elmore, R. F., & Rothman, R. (Eds.). (1999). Testing, teaching, and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12.
Elsbree, W.S. (1959). Getting and keeping able teachers. Teachers College Record, 60, 327-336.
13.
Erk, A. (1993, October). Job-related education and training: Their impact on earnings. Monthly Labor Review, 116(10), 21-37.
14.
Fennema, E., & Franke, M.L. (1992). Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan.
15.
Ingersoll, R., & Gruber, K. (1996). Out-of-field teaching and educational equality . Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
16.
Kennedy, M.M. (2003). Examining teacher quality (SIRG Brief 7). In F. K. Lester & J. Ferrini-Mundy (Eds.), Proceedings of the NCTM research catalyst conference (pp. 73-82). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
17.
Kliebard, H.M. (1987). The struggle for the American curriculum 1893-1958 . New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
18.
Knapp, M. (1995). Teaching for meaning in high poverty classrooms . New York: Teachers College Press .
19.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Lewis, L., Pashad, B., Carey, N., Bartfai, N., Farris, E., Smerdan, B., et al. (1999). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualification of public school teachers (NCES 1999-080). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics . Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999080.pdf
21.
Lubienski, S.T. (2002). A closer look at Black-White mathematics gaps: Intersections of race and SES in NAEP achievement and instructional practices . Journal of Negro Education, 71, 269-287.
22.
Massell, D. (1994). Setting standards in mathematics and social studies . Education and Urban Society, 26, 118-140.
23.
Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1996 ). The preparation of teachers of mathematics: Considerations and challenges. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
Meister, J.C. (1998). Corporate universities: Lessons in building a world-class work force. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Milanowski, A. (2003). An exploration of the pay levels needed to attract students with mathematics, science and technology skills to a career in K-12 teaching. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(50). Retrieved November 10, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n50/
26.
Miller, L.S. (1995). An American imperative: Accelerating minority educational advancement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Miller, R.P. (2002, June). New York: The state of learning, A report to the governor and the legislature on the educational status of the state's schools. Albany: University of the State of New York and the State Department of Education.
28.
Morris, D. (with McGann, E. ).(2004). Rewriting history. New York: ReganBooks.
29.
Moses, R.P., & Cobb, C.E. (2001). Radical equations: Math and literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon.
30.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 1959). The secondary mathematics curriculum. Mathematics Teacher, 52, 389-417.
31.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
32.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
33.
North Central RegionalEducational Laboratory. (2000, February). A study of the differences between higher- and lower-performing Indiana schools in reading and mathematics. Naperville, IL: Author.
34.
Pelavin, S., & Kane, M. (1990). Changing the odds: Factors increasing access to college. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
35.
Rand(2003). Mathematical proficiency for all students: Toward a strategic research and development program in mathematics education. Santa Monica, CA: Author.
36.
Richardson, J.W. (2003). Battling before birth: Institutional barriers to the health and well-being of African American children. In C. C. Yeakey & R. D. Henderson (Eds.), Surmounting all odds: Education, opportunity, and society in new millennium (pp. 125-145). Greenwich, CT : Information Age.
37.
Roey, S., Caldwell, N., Rust, K., Blumstein, E., Krenzke, T., Legum, S., et al. (2001). The 1998 high school transcript tabulation: Data on credits earned and demographics for 1998, 1994, 1990, 1987, and 1982 high school graduates (NCES 2001-498)Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
38.
Rowan, B. (2004, Summer). Teachers matter: Evidence from value-added assessments. AERA Research Points, 2(2), 1-4. Retrieved October 10, 2004. http://www.aera.net/
39.
Secada, W.G. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 623-660). New York: Macmillan.
40.
Shapiro, T.M. (2004). The hidden cost of being African American: How wealth perpetuates inequality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
41.
Silver, E.A., & Stein, M.K. (1996). The QUASAR Project: The “Revolution of the Possible” in mathematics instructional reform in urban middle schools . Urban Education, 30(4), 476-521.
42.
Smith, M.S., & O'Day, J. (1991). Putting the pieces together: Systemic school reform (CPRE Policy Brief RB-06-4191)New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved May 9, 2005, from http://www.cpre.org/Publications/Publications_Policy_Briefs.htm
43.
Stevenson, H., & Stigler, J. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what can we learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit.
44.
Suter, L.E. (2000). Is student achievement immutable? Evidence from international students on schooling and student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 529-545.
45.
Tate, W.F. (1995). School mathematics and African American students: Thinking seriously about opportunity-to-learn standards. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 424-448.
46.
Tate, W.F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: An update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 652-679.
47.
Tate, W.F. (2005). Access and opportunities to learn are not accidents: Engineering mathematical progress in your school. Greensboro, NC: SERVE.
48.
Tate, W.F., & Johnson, H.C. (1999). Mathematical reasoning and educational policy: Moving beyond the politics of dead language. In L. V. Stiff (Ed.), Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12 (pp. 221-233). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
49.
Tate, W.F., & Rousseau, C. (2002). Access and opportunity: The political and social context of mathematics education. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 271-299). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Hope for urban education: A study of nine high-performing, high-poverty urban elementary schools. Washington, DC: Author.
51.
Verdugo, R.R., & Henderson, R.D. (2003). The dropout rate among African American males: A policy perspective. In C. C. Yeakey & R. D. Henderson (Eds.), Surmounting all odds: Education, opportunity, and society in new millennium (pp. 487-522). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
52.
Webster, W.J. (1997, May). The Dallas value-added accountability system (Division of Research, Evaluation, and Information Systems). Dallas, TX: Dallas Independent School District.
53.
Webster, W.J., Mendro, R.L., Orsak, T.H., & Weerasinghe, D. (1997, March). A comparison of the results produced by selected regression and hierarchical linear models in the estimation of school and teacher effect. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
54.
Western, B., & Pettit, B. (2000). Incarceration and racial inequality in men's employment . Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(1), 3-16.
55.
Wright, P.S., Horn, S.P., & Saunders, W.L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation . Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67.