This article presents the theoretical foundation of followership. The words follower and followership are increasingly used in discussions of leadership and organizations, and many think that the field of followership began in 1988 with Kelley's “In Praise of Followers.” Followership research began in 1955, and literature in the social sciences discussed followers and followership for decades prior. By examining why leadership rather than followership is emphasized; discussing antecedents, early theory, and research about followership; and identifying common themes found in the literature, this article provides the foundation that has been missing in contemporary discussion of the followership construct.
Baker, S.D. (2006). The effect of leader-follower agreement on team effectiveness. Dissertation Abstracts International, 6 (03), A. (UMI No. 3209933)
2.
Bargal, D., & Schmid, H. (1989). Recent themes in theory and research on leadership and their implications for management of human services. Administration in Social Work, 13, 37-54.
3.
Barnard, C. (1987). The theory of authority. In L. E. Boone & D. D. Bowen (Eds.), The great writings in management and organizational behavior (2nd ed., pp. 92-104). New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
5.
Berg, D.N. (1998). Resurrecting the muse: Followership in organizations . In E. B. Klein, F. Gabelnick, & P. Herr (Eds.), The psychodynamics of leadership (pp. 27-52). Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.
6.
Bjugstad, K., Thach, E.C., Thompson, K.J., & Morris, A. (2006). A fresh look at followership: A model for matching followership and leadership styles. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7, 304-319.
7.
Brown, A.D., & Thornborrow, W.T. (1996). Do organizations get the followers they deserve?Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 17, 5-11.
8.
Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
Chaleff, I. (1995). The courageous follower: Standing up to and for our leaders. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler .
10.
Collinson, D. (2006). Rethinking followership: A post-structuralist analysis of follower identities. The Leadership Quarterly , 17, 179-189.
11.
Cooper, D.C., Scandura, T., & Schriesheim, C.A. (2005). Looking forward but learning from our past: Potential challenges to developing authentic leadership theory and authentic leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 475-493.
12.
Daft, R.L. (1999). Leadership theory and practice. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden.
13.
Eagly, A.H. (2005). Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter?The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 459-474.
14.
Follett, M.P. (1960). Management as a profession. In H. F. Merrill (Ed.), Classics in management (pp. 309-322). New York: American Management Association.
15.
Follett, M.P. (1996). The essentials of leadership. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary ParkerFollett: Prophet of management (pp: 163-177). Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
16.
French, J.R.P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute of Social Research.
17.
Frew, D.R. (1977). Leadership and followership. Personnel Journal, 56, 90-97.
18.
Galton, F. (1900). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences (2nd American ed.). New York: D. Appleton.
19.
Gardner, W.L., Avolio, B., Luthans, F., May, D.R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 342-372.
20.
Gilbert, G.R. (1985). Building highly productive work teams through positive leadership. Public Personnel Management, 14, 449-454.
21.
Gilbert, G.R. (1990, June). Effective leaders must be good followers, too. Government Executive, 22, 58.
22.
Gilbert, G.R., & Hyde, A.C. (1988). Followership and the federal worker. Public Administration Review, 48, 962-968.
23.
Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2006). The art of followership. European Business Forum, 25, 22-26.
24.
Graen, G.B., & Uhl-Bien, M.1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX theory) over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
25.
Graham, J.W. (1988). Chapter 3 commentary: Transformational leadership: Fostering follower autonomy, not automatic followership. In J. G. Hunt, B. R. Baliga , H. P. Dachler, & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Emerging leadership vistas (pp. 73-79). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
26.
Gronn, P. (2003). Leadership: Who needs it? School Leadership and Management, 23, 267-290.
27.
Hansen, T.L., Jr. (1987). Management's impact on first-line supervisor effectiveness . SAM Advanced Management Journal, 52, 41-45.
28.
Heifetz, R.A. (1999). Leadership vs. authority. Across the Board, 36, 19-20.
29.
Heller, T., & Van Til, J. (1982). Leadership and followership: Some summary propositions . Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 18, 405-414.
30.
Herold, D.M. (1977). Two-way influence processes in leader-follower dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 224-237.
31.
Hollander, E.P. (1974). Processes of leadership emergence. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 19-33.
32.
Hollander, E.P. (1992a). The essential interdependence of leadership and followership. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 1, 71-74.
33.
Hollander, E.P. (1992b). Leadership, followership, self, and others. The Leadership Quarterly, 3, 43-54.
34.
Hollander, E.P. (1997). How and why active followers matter in leadership . In B. Adams & S. Webster (Eds.), Kellogg leadership studies project working papers: The balance of leadership and followership (pp. 11-30). College Park, MD: Academy of Leadership Press.
35.
Hollander, E.P., & Julian, J.W. (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership processes. Psychological Bulletin,71, 387-397.
36.
Hollander, E.P., & Offermann, L.R. (1990). Relational features of organizational leadership and followership. In K. E. Clark & M. B. Clark (Eds.), Measures of leadership (pp. 83-97). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.
37.
Hollander, E.P., & Webb, W.B. (1955). Leadership, followership, and friendship: An analysis of peer nominations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 50, 163-167.
38.
Homans, G.C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.
39.
Homans, G.C. (1974). Social behavior (Revised ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
40.
Howell, J.M., & Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review, 30, 96-112.
41.
Hunt, J.G. (1984). Leadership and managerial behavior. (Modules in Management.)Chicago: Research Science Associates.
42.
Kaysen, C. (Ed.). (1996). The American corporation today. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
44.
Kelley, R.E. (1988). In praise of followers. Harvard Business Review, 66, 142-148.
45.
Kelley, R.E. (1991). Combining followership and leadership into partnership . In R. H. Kilmann, I. Kilmann, & Associates (Eds.), Making organizations competitive: Enhancing networks and relationships across traditional boundaries (pp. 195-220). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). The allure of toxic leaders: Why we follow destructive bosses and corrupt politicians—and how we can survive them. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
Lippitt, R. (1982). The changing leader-follower relationships of the 1980s. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 18, 395-403.
48.
Litzinger, W., & Schaefer, T. (1982). Leadership through followership. Business Horizons, 25, 78-81.
49.
Lord, R.G., & Brown, D.J. (2001). Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts . The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 133-152.
50.
Lundin, S.C., & Lancaster, L.C. (1990). Beyond leadership . . . The importance of followership. The Futurist, 24(3), 18-22.
51.
Mead, M. (1949). Problems of leadership and mental health. World Federation for Mental Health Bulletin (1949- 1952), 1(6), 7-12.
52.
Meindl, J.R., Ehrlich, S.B., & Dukerich, J.M. (1985). The romance of leadership . Administrative Science Quarterly,30, 78-102.
53.
Pittman, T.S., Rosenbach, W.E., & Potter, E.H., III. (1998). Followers as partners: Taking the initiative for action. In W. E. Rosenbach & R. L. Taylor (Eds.), Contemporary issues in leadership (pp. 107-120). Boulder, CO : Westview.
54.
Potter, E.H., III, Rosenbach, W.E., & Pittman, T.S. (1996). Leading the new professional. In R. L. Taylor & W. E. Rosenbach (Eds.), Military leadership: In pursuit of excellence (3rd ed., pp. 145-152). Boulder, CO: Westview.
55.
Sanford, F.H. (1950). Authoritarianism and leadership. Philadelphia: Institute for Research in Human Relations .
56.
Schriesheim, C.A., Castro, S.L., Zhou, X.T., & Yammarino, F.J. (2001). The folly of theorizing “a” but testing “b”: A selective level-of-analysis review of the field and a detailed leader-member exchange illustration. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 515-551.
57.
Smith, G.D., & Dyer, D. (1996). The rise and transformation of the American corporation . In C. Kaysen (Ed.), The American corporation today (pp. 28-73). New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
Steger, J.A., Manners, G. E., Jr., & Zimmerer, T.W. (1982). Following the leader: How to link management style to subordinate personalities. Management Review, 71, 22-28, 49-51.
59.
Tjosvold, D., Andrews, R., & Jones, H. (1983). Cooperative and competitive relationships between leaders and subordinates. Human Relations, 36, 1111-1124.
60.
Useem, M. (1996). Corporate education and training. In C. Kaysen (Ed.), The American corporation today (pp. 292-326). New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
Vanderslice, V.J. (1988). Separating leadership from leaders: An assessment of the effect of leader and follower roles in organizations. Human Relations, 41, 677-696.
62.
Vecchio, R.P. (1997). Effective followership: Leadership turned upside down. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (pp. 114-123). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
63.
Vecchio, R.P. (2002). Leadership and gender advantage. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 643-671.
64.
Wortman, M.S., Jr. (1982). Strategic management and changing leader-follower roles. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 18, 371-383.
65.
Zierdan, W.E. (1980). Leading through the follower's point of view. Organizational Dynamics, 8, 27-46.
