Blass, R.B., & Carmeli, Z. (2007). The case against neuropsychoanalysis: On fallacies underlying psychoanalysis' latest scientific trend and its negative impact on psychoanalytic discourse. International Journal of Psychoanalysis88:19-40.
2.
Csibra, G. (2004). Mirror neurons and action observation: Is simulation involved?Interdisciplines. http://www.interdisciplines.org/mirror/papers/4 .
3.
Freed, P. (2008). Can words become numbers? Sources of blur in the quantification of brain and mind: Commentary on "Functional neuroimaging- can it contribute to our understanding of processes of change?" NeuroPsychoanalysis10:17-23.
4.
Gallese, V., Eagle, M.N., & Migone, P. (2007). Intentional attunement: Mirror neurons and the neural underpinnings of interpersonal relations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association55:131-176.
5.
Ledoux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain. New York : Simon & Schuster.
6.
Mccabe, D.P., & Castel, A.D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition107:343-352.
7.
Olds, D.D. (2006). Interdisciplinary studies and our practice. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association54:857-876.
8.
Poldrack, R.A. (2008). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences10:59-63.
9.
Pulver, S. (2003). The astonishing clinical irrelevance of neuroscience . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association51:755-772.
10.
Solms, M., & Turnbull, O. (2002). The Brain and the Inner World. New York: Other Press.