This paper re-examines within a contemporary context an essential foundation of classical technique, the psychoanalytic situation. Defined in terms of basic elements of psychoanalytic relatedness which make possible the most profound exploration of human motivation, its core structure is viewed as an extraordinary interpersonal arrangement anchored by two clearly differentiated yet complimentary ways of relating: free-association and analytic neutrality. The patient's role, organized by the prerequisites of expressive freedom, is counter posed with the psychoanalyst's, which is structured to empower listening and understanding. Elaborating the parameters of this unique relationship, the authors emphasize the synergic effects of each participants' activity in creating a vehicle for destabilizing neurotic equilibrium. An extensive discussion of analytic neutrality, conceived as guiding ideal that informs all the analyst's attitudes and actions in the exploration of psychic reality, is presented. Specifically, the authors distinguish three essential dimensions which bear upon the interactive process: neutrality with regard to conflict, neutrality with regard to sequence, and neutrality with regard to transference. In contrast to the rigid constraint on human responsiveness often caricatured in the literature. this vision of technical neutrality establishes its vital contribution to the integrity, depth, and tone of any analytic process that unfolds.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adlere, E. (1991). The eye of the storm: psychoanalytic reality and the analyst's vision. In The Psyhoanalyst; The Interplay of Work and Identity. Monograph, Westchester Center for the Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. 1:3–19.
2.
Apfelbaum, & Gill, M. (1989). Ego analysis and the relativity of defense: technical implications of the structural theory. J. Amer: Psychoanal. Assn., 37:1071–1096.
3.
Arlow, J. (1963). The supervisory situation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 11:577–593.
4.
Arlow, J., & Brenner, C. (1990). The psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Q., 59:532–549.
5.
Aron, L. (1995). On knowing and being known: toward a theoretical framework for analyst self-disclosure. Paper presented at the Extension Committee of the New York Psychoanalytic Society, Spring Symposium, “Aspects of Self-Revelation and Disclosure: Analyst to Patient, ” March 11.
6.
Bachant, J.; Lynch, A.; & Richards, A. (1995). Relational models in psychoanalytic theory. Psyhoanal. Psychol., 12:71–87.
7.
Bachant, J., & Richardas, D. (1993). Review essay: Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration, by Stephen Mitchell. Psyhoanal. Dial., 3:431–460.
8.
Bergmann, M. S. & Hartmafn, F. R. (1976). The Evolution of Psychoanalytic Technique. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Boesky, D. (1982). Acting out: a reconsideration of the concept. Int. J. Psychoanal., 63:39–54.
10.
Boesky, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psyhoanal. Q., 59:550–584.
11.
Brenner, C. (1976). Psychoanalytic Technique and Psychic Conflict. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
12.
Chused, J. F. (1991). The evocative power of enactments. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:615–639.
13.
Cooper, A. M. (1987). Changes in psychoanalytic ideas: transference interpretation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:77–98.
14.
Fenichel, O. (1941). Problems of Psychoanalytic Technique. New York: Psychoanalytic Quarterly.
15.
Freedmann, N. (1985). The concept of transformation in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Psychol., 2(4):317–339.
16.
Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. In The Writings, Vol. 2. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1066.
17.
Freuds, S. (1915). Observations on transference-love. (Further recommendations on the techniq;uie of psychoanalysis III). S. E., 12:157–171.
18.
Freuds, S. (1916–1917). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. S. E., 16.
19.
Gill, M. M. (1982). Analysis of the Transference, Vol. 1. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
20.
Gill, M. M. (1990). On the nature of therapeutic action in psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 381083–1097.
21.
Gill, M. M. (1994). Psychoanalysis in Transition: A Personal View. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
22.
Gill, M. M. (1995). Discussion of relational models papers. Psychoanal. Psychol., 12:89–107.
23.
Gray, P. (1973). Psychoanalytic technique and the ego's capacity for viewing intra-psychic activity. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 21:474–494.
24.
Gray, P. (1994). The Ego and the Analysis of Defense. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
25.
Greenberj, J. (1991). Oedipus and Beyond: a Clincial Theory. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard Univ. Press.
26.
Greenberj, J. (1995). Psychoanalytic technique and the interactive matrix. Psychoanal. Q., 64:1–23.
27.
Greenson, R. (1967). The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis, vol. 1. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
28.
Hartmann, H. (1951). Technical implications of ego psychology. Psychoanal. Q., 20:31–43.
29.
Hoffman, I. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst's experience. Contemp. Psychoanal., 19:389–422.
30.
Hoffman, I. Z. (1991). Discussion: toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Dial., 1:74–105.
31.
Jacobs, T. J. (1995). Paper presented at the Extension Committee of the New York Psychoanalytic Society, Spring Symposium: “Aspects of Self-Revelation and Disclosure: Analyst to Patient, ” March 11.
32.
Kris, A. O. (1982). Free-Association: Method and Process. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
33.
Kwawer, J. (1995). Discussion of Aron's presentation: “whose analysis is it, anyway? The mutual analysis of an analyst's dream.”Paper presented at the Westchester Center for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Conference on “Boundary Dilemmas in the Psychoanalytic Relationship, ” March 25.
34.
Langs, R. (1973). The Technique of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, Vol. 1. New York: Jason Aronson.
35.
Langs, R. & Stone, L. (1980). The Therapeutic Experience and Its Setting. New York: Jason Aronson.
36.
Levenson, E. (1995). Self-revelation and self-disclosure. Paper presented at the Extension Committee of the New York Psychoanalytic Society, Spring Symposium: “Aspects of Self-Revelation and Disclosure: Analyst to Patient, ” March 11.
37.
Levine, F. J. (1993). Unconscious fantasy and theories of technique. Psychoanal. Inq., 13:326–342.
38.
Lipton, S. D. (1977). The advantages of Freud's technique as shown in his analysis of the Rat Man. Int. J. Psychoanal., 58:255–273.
39.
Loewald, H. W. (1960). On the therapeutic action of psycho-analysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 41:16–33.
40.
McLaughlin, J. (1987). The place of transference: some reflections on enactment in the psychoanalytic situation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:557–582.
41.
McLaughlin, J. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:595–614.
42.
Nunberg, H. (1960). The synthetic function of the ego. In Practice and Theory of Psychoanalysis. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 120–136.
43.
Panel (1992). Enactments in psychoanalysis. Reported by M. Johan. J Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:827–841.
44.
Pine, F. (1985). Developmental Theory and Clinical Process. New Haven. CT, & London: Yale Univ. Press.
45.
Pine, F. (1993). A contribution to the analysis of the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Q., 62:185–205.
46.
Poland, W. (1988). Insight and the analytic dyad. Psychoanal. Q., 57:341–369.
47.
Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst's irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Q., 57:553–571.
48.
Renik, O. (1995). The ideal of the anonymous analyst and the problem of self-disclosure. Paper presented at the Extension Committee of the New York Psychoanalytic Society, Spring Symposium: “Aspects of Self-Revelation and Disclosure: Analyst to Patient, ” March 11.
49.
Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role responsiveness. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 3:43–47.
50.
Schafer, R. (1992). Retelling a Life. New York: Basic Books.
51.
Stone, L. (1961). The Psychoanalytic Situation: An Examination of Its Development and Essential Nature, New York: Int. Univ. Press.
52.
Waelder, R. (1936). The principle of multiple function. Psychoanal, Q., 5:45–62.
53.
Winnicott, D. W. (1956). On transference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 37:386–388.
