The effect of the socioeconomic characteristics in one generation on the socioeconomic achievement of the next generation is the central concern of social stratification research. Researchers typically address this issue by analyzing the associations between the characteristics of parents and offspring. This approach, however, focuses on observed parent-offspring pairs and ignores that changes in the socioeconomic characteristics of one generation may alter the numbers and types of intergenerational family relationships created in the next one. Models of intergenerational effects that include marriage and fertility as well as the intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic status yield a richer account of intergenerational effects at both the family and population levels. When applied to a large sample of Indonesian women and their families, these models show that the effects of women's educational attainment on the educational attainments of the next generation are positive. However, the beneficial effects of increases in women's schooling on the educational attainment of their children are partially offset at the population level by a reduction in the overall number of children that a more educated population of women bears and enhanced by the more favorable marriage partners of better educated women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AstoneNan MarieMcLanahanSara S.1991. “Family Structure, Parental Practices, and High School Completion.”American Sociological Review56: 309–20.
2.
Badan Pusat Statistik. Republik Indonesia (Statistics Indonesia of the Republic of Indonesia).2004. Retrieved May 14, 2006 (http://www.bps.go.id/sector/population/tables.shtml).
3.
BeckerGary S.1991. A Treatise on the Family.2d ed.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BehrmanJere R.RosenzweigMark R.2002. “Does Increasing Women's Schooling Raise the Schooling of the Next Generation.”American Economic Review92: 323–34.
5.
BlakeJudith1989. Family Size and Achievement.Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BlauPeter M.DuncanOtis Dudley1967. The American Occupational Structure.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
7.
BledsoeCaroline H.CasterlineJohn B.Johnson-KuhnJennifer A.HaagaJohn G.1999. Critical Perspectives on Schooling and Fertility in the Developing World.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
BreenRichardGoldthorpeJohn H.1997. “Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory.”Rationality and Society9: 275–305.
9.
CaldwellJohn C.1986. “Routes to Low Mortality in Poor Countries.”Population and Development Review12: 171–220.
10.
CobbeJamesBoediono1993. “Education, Demographics, the Labor Market, and Development: Indonesia in the Process of Transition?”Journal of Asian and African Studies28: 1–29.
11.
DiamondIanNewbyMargaretVarleSarah1999. “Female Education and Fertility: Examining the Links.” Pp. 23–48 in Critical Perspectives on Schooling and Fertility in the Developing World, edited by BledsoeC. H.CasterlineJ. B.Johnson-KuhnJ. A.HaagaJ. G.. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12.
DuncanBeverlyDuncanOtis Dudley1969. “Family Stability and Occupational Success.”Social Problems16: 273–85.
13.
DuncanOtis Dudley1966. “Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Social Mobility.” Pp. 51–97 in Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development, edited by SmelserN. J.LipsetS. M.. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
14.
EriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H.1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies.Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
15.
FeathermanDavid L.HauserRobert M.1978. Opportunity and Change.New York: Academic Press.
16.
FrankenbergElizabethHamiltonPaulaPolichSuzanneSuriastiniWayanThomasDuncan2000. “User's Guide for the Indonesia Family Life Survey, Wave 2.” RAND DRU-2238/2-NIA/NICHD. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
17.
HirschmanCharlesGuestPhilip1990. “The Emerging Demographic Transitions of Southeast Asia.”Population and Development Review16: 121–52.
18.
HoutMichael1988. “More Universalism, Less Structural Mobility: The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s.”American Journal Of Sociology93: 1358–1400.
JencksChristopherSmithMarshallAclandHenryJo BaneMaryCohenDavidGintisHerbertHeynsBarbaraMichelsonStephan1972. Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America.New York: Basic Books.
21.
JonesGavin1994. Marriage and Divorce in Islamic South-East Asia.New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
KingElizabeth M.HillM. Anne1993. Women's Education in Developing Countries: Barriers, Benefits, and Policy.Washington DC: The World Bank.
23.
KnodelJohnJonesGavin W.1996. “Post-Cairo Population Policy: Does Promoting Girls' Schooling Miss the Mark?”Population and Development Review22: 683–702.
24.
LloydCynthia1994. “Investing in the Next Generation: The Implications of High Fertility at the Level of the Family.” Pp. 181–202 in Population and Development: Old Debates and New Conclusions, edited by CassenR.. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
25.
LoganJohn AllenHoffPeter D.NewtonMichael A.2001. “A Parametric Two-Sided Model of Marriage.” Working Paper No. 15, Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences. University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
26.
MaralaniVida2004. “Family Size and Educational Attainment in Indonesia: A Cohort Perspective.” Working Paper 017-04, California Center for Population Research, UCLA Institute for Social Science Research, Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved May 14, 2006 (http://www.ccpr.ucla.edu/ccprwpseries/ccpr_017_04.pdf).
27.
MareRobert D.1981. “Change and Stability in Educational Stratification.”American Sociological Review46: 72–87.
MareRobert D.2000. “Assortative Mating, Intergenerational Mobility, and Educational Inequality.” Working Paper CCPR 004-00, California Center for Population Research, UCLA Institute for Social Science Research, Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved May 14, 2006 (http://www.ccpr.ucla.edu/ccprwpseries/ccpr_004_00.pdf).
30.
MareRobert D.ChangHuey-Chi2006. “Family Attainment Norms and Educational Stratification in the United States and Taiwan: New Models for School Transitions.” Pp. 195–231 in Mobility and Inequality: Frontiers of Research in Economic and Social Mobility, edited by FieldsG.GruskyD. B.MorganS. L.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
MatrasJudah1967. “Social Mobility and Social Structure: Some Insights from the Linear Model.”American Sociological Review32: 608–14.
32.
McLanahanSara S.SandefurGary D.1994. Growing up with a Single Parent.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
MuellerEva1984. “Income, Aspirations, and Fertility in Rural Areas of Less Developed Countries.” Pp. 121–50 in Rural Development and Human Fertility, edited by SchutjerW. A.StokesC. S.. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
34.
MukherjeeRamkrishna1954. “A Further Note on the Analysis of Data on Social Mobility.” Pp. 242–59 in Social Mobility in Britain, edited by GlassD. V.. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
35.
SchultzT. Paul.2001. “Why Governments Should Invest More to Educate Girls.” Discussion Paper No. 836, Economic Growth Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
36.
SewellWilliam H.HallerArchibald O.PortesAlejandro1969. “The Educational and Early Occupational Attainment Process.”American Sociological Review34: 89–92.
ShavitYossiPierceJennifer L.1991. “Sibship Size and Educational Attainment in Nuclear and Extended Families: Arabs and Jews in Israel.”American Sociological Review56: 321–30.
39.
SummersLawrence H.1994. Investing in All the People: Educating Women in Developing Countries.Washington DC: World Bank.
40.
ThomasDuncan1994. “Like Father, Like Son; Like Mother Like Daughter: Parental Resources and Child Height.”Journal of Human Resources29: 950–88.
41.
TreimanDonald J.GanzeboomHarry B. G.1999. “The Fourth Generation of Comparative Stratification Research.”In Sociological Research at the End of the Century, edited by QuahS.SalesA.. London, UK: Sage.
42.
WinshipChristopherMareRobert D.1992. “Models for Sample Selection Bias.”Annual Review of Sociology18: 327–50.
