Eggs and sperm are parallel bodily goods in that each contributes half of the reproductive material needed to create life. Yet these cells are produced by differently sexed bodies, allowing for a comparative analysis of how the social process of bodily commodification varies based on sex and gender. Drawing on interview and observational data from two egg agencies and two sperm banks in the United States, this article compares how staff recruit, screen, market, and compensate women and men donors. Results show how gendered norms inspire more altruistic rhetoric in egg donation than in sperm donation, producing different regimes of bodily commodification for women and men. I conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for debates in sociology of gender about biological differences among women and men and the cultural norms attributed to these differences; debates in economic sociology about how social factors shape the expansion of the market; and debates in medical sociology about the intersection of the market and medical practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abolaf iaMitchel.1996. Making Markets: Opportunism and Restraint on Wall Street.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
AckerJoan.1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.”Gender and Society4: 139–58.
3.
AlmelingRene.2006. “‘Why Do You Want To Be a Donor?’: Gender and the Production of Altruism in Egg and Sperm Donation.”New Genetics and Society25: 143–57.
4.
American Society for Reproductive Medicine Ethics Committee.2000. “Financial Incentives in Recruitment of Oocyte Donors.”Fertility and Sterility74: 216–20.
5.
AppaduraiArjun.1986. “Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.” Pp. 3–63 in The Social Life of Things, edited by AppaduraiA.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BakerWayne.1984. “The Social Structure of a National Securities Market.”American Journal of Sociology89: 775–811.
7.
BeckerGay.2000. The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8.
BeckerGayButlerAnnelieseNachtigallRobert.2005. “Resemblance Talk: A Challenge for Parents Whose Children were Conceived with Donor Gametes in the US.”Social Science and Medicine61: 1300–09.
9.
ButlerJudith.1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex.New York: Routledge.
10.
ChodorowNancy.1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11.
ConradPeterLeiterValerie.2004. “Medicalization, Markets and Consumers.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior45: 158–76.
12.
ConradPeterSchneiderJoseph.1980. Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
13.
CovingtonSharonForthcomingWilliam Gibbons. (2007). “What is Happening to the Price of Eggs?”Fertility and Sterility..
14.
DanielsCynthiaGoldenJanet.2004. “Popular Eugenics, Artificial Insemination and the Rise of the American Sperm Banking Industry.”Journal of Social History38: 5–27.
15.
DanielsKenLewisGillian.1996. “Donor Insemination: The Gifting and Selling of Semen.”Social Science and Medicine42: 1521–36.
16.
De BeauvoirSimone. [1952] 1989. The Second Sex.New York: Vintage.
17.
DusterTroy.2003. Backdoor to Eugenics.New York: Routledge.
18.
EmondMichaelScheibJoanna.1998. “Why Not Donate Sperm? A Study of Potential Donors.”Evolution and Human Behavior19: 313–19.
19.
EnglandPaulaFolbreNancy.2005. “Gender and Economic Sociology.” Pp. 627–49 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by SmelserN.SwedbergR.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Fausto-SterlingAnne.2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of the Body.New York: Basic Books.
21.
FranklinSarah.1997. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception.London: Routledge.
22.
FreeseJeremyAllen LiJui-ChungWadeLisa.2003. “The Potential Relevances of Biology to Social Inquiry.”Annual Review of Sociology29: 233–56.
23.
FujimuraJoan.2006. “‘Sex Genes’: A Critical Sociomaterial Approach to the Politics and Molecular Genetics of Sex Determination.”Signs32: 49–82.
24.
GordonLinda.1976. Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America.New York: Viking Press.
25.
HaimesErica.1993. “Issues of Gender in Gamete Donation.”Social Science and Medicine3: 85–93.
26.
HaysSharon.1996. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
HealyKieran.2006. Last Best Gifts: Altruism and the Market for Human Blood and Organs.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Hill CollinsPatricia.2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment.New York: Routledge.
29.
HochschildArlie.1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
KanterRosabeth M.1977. Men and Women of the Corporation.New York: Basic Books.
31.
Katz RothmanBarbara.1986. The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood.New York: Viking.
32.
Kessler-HarrisAlice.1990. A Woman's Wage: Historical Meanings and Social Consequences.Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
33.
KligmanGail.1998. The Politics of Duplicity: Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu's Romania.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
KopytoffIgor.1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process.” Pp. 64–91 in The Social Life of Things, edited by AppaduraiA.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35.
LightDonald.2004. “Ironies of Success: A New History of the American Health Care System.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior45: 1–24.
36.
LukerKristen.1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37.
MartinEmily.1991. “The Egg and the Sperm: How Science has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles.”Signs16: 485–501.
38.
MartinEmily.1992. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction.Boston, MA: Beacon.
39.
McKinleyJohnStoekleJohn.1988. “Corporatization and the Social Transformation of Doctoring.”International Journal of Health Services18: 191–205.
40.
MilkmanRuth.1987. Gender at Work: The Dynamics of Job Segregation by Sex During World War II.Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
41.
MurrayThomas.1996. “New Reproductive Technologies and the Family.” Pp. 51–69 in New Ways of Making Babies, edited by CohenC.. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
42.
NelsonJulieEnglandPaula.2002. “Feminist Philosophies of Love and Work.”Hypatia17: 1–18.
43.
NovaesSimone Bateman.1998. “The Medical Management of Donor Insemination.” Pp. 105–30 in Donor Insemination, edited by DanielsK.HaimesE.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44.
OrtnerSherry.1974. “Is Female to Male as Nature is to Culture?” Pp. 67–87 in Woman, Culture and Society, edited by RosaldoM.LamphereL.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
RagonéHeléna.1999. “The Gift of Life: Surrogate Motherhood, Gamete Donation and Constructions of Altruism.” Pp. 65–88 in Transformative Motherhood, edited by LayneL.. New York: New York University Press.
46.
RappRayna.2000. “Foreword.” Pp. xiii–xvi in Ideologies and Technologies of Motherhood, edited by RagonéH.TwineF. W.. New York: Routledge.
47.
RindfussRonaldPhilip MorganS.OffuttKate.1996. “Education and the Changing Age Pattern of American Fertility: 1963-1989.”Demography33: 277–90.
48.
RobertsDorothy.1997. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction and the Meaning of Liberty.New York: Pantheon.
49.
RoseSusanLewisTené.2005. “Psychosocial Factors and Cardiovascular Diseases.”Annual Review of Public Health26: 469–500.
50.
RubinGayle.1975. “The Traffic in Women.” Pp. 157–210 in Toward an Anthropology of Women, edited by ReiterR.. New York: Monthly Review Press.
51.
SchmidtMatthewMooreLisa Jean.1998. “Constructing a ‘Good Catch,’ Picking a Winner: The Development of Technosemen and the Deconstruction of the Monolithic Male.” Pp. 21–39 in Cyborg Babies, edited by Davis-FloydR.DumitJ.. New York: Routledge.
52.
SchoverL. R.CollinsR. L.QuigleyM. M.BlanksteinJ.KanotiG..1991. “Psychological Follow-up of Women Evaluated as Oocyte Donors.”Human Reproduction6: 1487–91.
53.
SchoverL. R.RothmannS. A.CollinsR. L..1992. “The Personality and Motivation of Semen Donors: A Comparison with Oocyte Donors.”Human Reproduction7: 575–79.
54.
SharpLesley.2000. “The Commodification of the Body and its Parts.”Annual Review of Anthropology29: 287–328.
55.
SmithCharles.1989. Auctions: The Social Construction of Value.New York: Free Press.
56.
TitmussRichard.1971. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy.New York: Pantheon Books.
57.
ToberDiane.2001. “Semen as Gift, Semen as Goods: Reproductive Workers and the Market in Altruism.”Body and Society7: 137–60.
58.
WhiteHarrison.1981. “Where Do Markets Come From?”American Journal of Sociology87: 517–47.
59.
WilliamsChristine.1995. Still a Man's World: Men Who Do Women's Work.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
60.
YanagisakoSylviaCollierJane.1990. “The Mode of Reproduction in Anthropology.” Pp. 131–41 in Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference, edited by RhodeD.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
61.
ZelizerViviana.1979. Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the United States.New York: Columbia University Press.
62.
ZelizerViviana.1985. Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children.New York: Basic Books.
63.
ZelizerViviana.1988. “Beyond the Polemics of the Market.”Sociological Forum3: 614–34.
64.
ZelizerViviana.2005. The Purchase of Intimacy.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
