Abstract
Laparoscopic ileocolic resection is feasible for Crohn's disease but few studies adjust for the various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables that may confound comparisons with open surgery. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes after laparoscopic (LICR) and open ileocolic resection (OICR) performed for regional enteritis using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data. Retrospective evaluation of data prospectively accrued into the NSQIP database for patients undergoing ileocolic resection for Crohn's by LICR and OICR was performed. LICR (n = 104) and OICR (n = 203) groups had similar age (P = 0.1), body mass index (P = 0.9), smoking history (P = 0.6), steroid use (P = 0.7), diabetes (P = 0.3), serum albumin (P = 0.07), and American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = 0.13). LICR group had more female patients (P = 0.005). Complications including surgical site infections (P = 0.5), wound dehiscence (P = 1), pneumonia (P = 0.1), deep vein thrombosis (P = 0.3), pulmonary embolism (P = 1), urinary infection (P = 0.1), and return to the operating room (P = 0.2) were similar. LICR had shorter length of hospital stay than OICR (P < 0.001). In current practice, as observed with the NSQIP data, LICR, performed by experienced surgeons, is comparable in safety to OICR and is associated with a shorter hospital stay.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.