The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and value of the junior medical student surgical clerkship for physicians now in practice. Questionnaires were sent to all Mercer University School of Medicine alumni (1986-2007) using a five-point Likert scale. One hundred and fifty-seven responses were received from 873 recipients (18%), 71 per cent training in nonsurgical specialties. “Scrubbing in” on cases was the most valuable activity (82%), followed by faculty rounds (76%), resident work rounds (70%), and lectures (69%). Least useful activities were question and answer sessions (54%), grand rounds (53%), and morbidity and mortality conferences (57%). The amount of time in the operating room was appropriate for 61 per cent, but to 8 per cent the operating room was a waste of time. Faculty evaluations gave the most effective feedback (75%). Alumni in surgical specialties and obstetrics and gynecology rated their experiences higher than nonsurgical physicians. Overall, only 44 per cent saw the material learned as important to general medical education. Opinions regarding the value of surgical clerkships to current practices were mixed. Undergraduate surgical education should emphasize common surgical conditions, surgical decision-making, and simple procedures relevant to a nonsurgical practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LindD.S., DeladismaA.M., CueJ.I.Survey of student education in surgery.J Am Coll Surg2007; 204: 969–74.
2.
National Resident Matching Program.Results and Data: 2010 Main Residency Match.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program, 2010, pp 9, 15. Available at: http://www.nrmp.org/data/resultsanddata2010.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2010.
3.
SprattJ.S.Jr., PappK.K.Practicing primary care physicians’ perspectives on the junior surgical clerkship.Am J Surg1997; 173: 231–3.
4.
CuretM.J., DaRosaD., MenninS.University and practice-based physicians’ input on the content of a surgical curriculum.Am J Surg1999; 178: 78–84.
5.
CuretM.J., McGrewM.C.Surgical practice of primary care physicians in a rural state: implications for curriculum design.Fam Med2000; 32: 97–101.
6.
LewisB.D., LeistenA., ArteagaD.Does the surgical clerkship meet the needs of practicing primary care physicians?WMJ2009; 108: 398–402.
7.
BirchD.W., MavisB.A needs assessment study of undergraduate surgical education.Can J Surg2006; 49: 314–5.
8.
DeS.K., HenkeP.K., AilawadiG.Attending, house office, and medical student perceptions about teaching in the third-year medical school general surgery clerkship.J Am Coll Surg2004; 199: 932–42.
9.
MusunuruS., LewisB., RikkersL.F.Effective surgical residents strongly influence medical students to pursue surgical careers.J Am Coll Surg2007; 204: 164–7.
10.
NaylorR.A., HollettL.A., ValentineR.J.Can medical students achieve skills proficiency through simulation training?Am J Surg2009; 198: 277–82.
11.
FernandoN., McAdamT., YoungsonG.Undergraduate medical students’ perceptions and expectations of theatre-based learning: how can we improve the student learning experience?Surgeon2007; 5: 271–4.
12.
AzizzadehA., McCollumC.H., MillerC.C.III. Factors influencing career choice among medical students interested in surgery.Curr Surg2003; 60: 210–3.
13.
BellR.H.Jr., BankerM.B., RhodesR.S.Graduate medical education in surgery in the United States.Surg Clin North Am2007; 87: 811–23.
14.
AreC., StoddardH.A., HuggettK.A regional perspective on the attitudes of fourth-year medical students toward the field of general surgery.J Surg Educ2009; 66: 123–8.
15.
GlynnR.W., KerinM.J.Factors influencing medical students and junior doctors in choosing a career in surgery.Surgeon2010; 8: 187–91.
