In 2010, 2.5 million people sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI), with an estimated 75 per cent being mild TBI. Mild TBI is defined as a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13 to 15. Based on recent data and our institutional experience, we hypothesized that mild TBI patients, including patients on aspirin, could be safely managed by trauma surgeons without neurosurgical consultation. Trauma patients admitted to a single Level I trauma center from June 2014 through July 2015 aged 18 years or older were evaluated. Patients with a GCS ≥14, regardless of intoxication, with an epidural or subdural hematoma ≤4 mm, trace or small subarachnoid hemorrhage, and/or non-displaced skull fracture were prospectively enrolled. The primary outcomes were needed for neurosurgical consultation and intervention. Secondary outcomes included readmission rate and neurologic morbidity and mortality rate. Of 1341 trauma admits, 77 were enrolled. No patients required neurosurgical intervention. Only 1/75 (1.3%) patients required neurosurgical consultation. Outpatient follow-up was achieved with 75/77 (97.4%) patients. No mortalities, major neurologic morbidities, or readmissions were observed (95% confidence interval 0–4%). None of the 21 patients on aspirin required neurosurgical intervention and only 1/21 (4.8%) patients required neurosurgical consultation with no mortalities observed at follow-up. Management of mild TBI can be safely accomplished by trauma surgeons without routine neurosurgical consultation. Larger multicenter prospective studies are required to evaluate our finding that this also may be safe in patients taking aspirin.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Injury prevention & control: traumatic brain injury. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/severe.html. Updated February 8, 2016. Accessed May 13, 2016.
3.
GeanA.D., FischbeinN.J.Head trauma.Neuroimaging Clin N Am2010; 20: 527–56.
4.
WashingtonC.W., GrubbR.Jr.Are routine repeat imaging and intensive care unit admission necessary in mild traumatic brain injury?J Neurosurg2012; 116: 549–57.
5.
VosP.E., BattistinL., BirbamerG.EFNS guideline on mild traumatic brain injury: report of an EFNS task force.Eur J Neurol2002; 9: 207–19.
6.
HyunhT., JacobsD.G., DixS.Utility of neurosurgical consultation for mild traumatic brain injury.Am Surg2006; 72: 1162–5; discussion 1166–7.
7.
ClementC.M., StiellI.G., SchullM.J.Clinical features of head injury patients presenting with a glasgow coma scale score of 15 and who require neurosurgical intervention.Ann Emerg Med2006; 48: 245–51.
8.
JosephB., AzizH., SadounM.The acute care surgery model: managing traumatic brain injury without inpatient neurological consultation.J Trauma Acute Care Surg2013; 75: 102–5.
9.
JosephB., AzizH., PanditV.Prospective validation of the brain injury guidelines: managing traumatic brain injury without neurosurgical consultation.J Trauma Acute Care Surg2014; 77: 984–8.
10.
JosephB., PanditV., HaiderA.A.Improving hospital quality and costs in nonoperative traumatic brain injury: the role of acute care surgeons.JAMA Surg2015; 150: 866–72.
HarrisP.A., TaylorR., ThielkeR.Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.J Biomed Inform2009; 42: 377–81.
13.
EspositoT.J., ReedR.L., GamelliR.L.Neurosurgical coverage: essential, desired, or irrelevant for good patient care and trauma center status.Ann Surg2005; 242: 364–70.
14.
EspositoT.J., LuchetteF.A., GamelliR.L.Do we need neurosurgical coverage in the trauma center?Adv Surg2006; 40: 213–21.
15.
JeretJ.S., MandellM., AnziskaB.Clinical predictors of abnormality disclosed by computed tomography after mild head trauma.Neurosurgery1993; 32: 9–16.
16.
MillerE.C., HolmesJ.F., DerletR.W.Utilizing clinical factors to reduce head CT scan ordering for minor head trauma patients.J Emerg Med1997; 15: 453–7.
BrownC.V., WengJ., OhD.Does routine serial computed tomography of the head influence management of traumatic brain injury? A prospective evaluation.J Trauma2004; 57: 939–43.
19.
VelmahosG.C., GervasiniA., PetrovickL.Routine repeat head CT for minimal head injury is unnecessary.J Trauma2006; 60: 494–501.
20.
SoniA.Aspirin Use among the Adult U.S. Noninstitutionalized Population, with and without Indicators of Heart Disease, 2005. Statistical Brief #179. July 2007. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/st179/stat179.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2016.
21.
van WalravenC., HartR.G., SingerD.E.Oral anticoagulants vs aspirin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: an individual patient meta-analysis.JAMA2002 20; 288: 2441–8.
22.
AguilarM.I., HartR., PearceL.A.Oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2007. Issue 3. Art. No. CD006186. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006186.pub2.
AhmedN., BialowasC., KuoY.H.Impact of pre-injury anticoagulation in patients with traumatic brain injury.South Med J2009; 102: 476–80.
25.
FortunaG.R., MuellerE.W., JamesL.E.The impact of preinjury antiplatelet and anticoagulant pharmacotherapy on outcomes in elderly patients with hemorrhagic brain injury.Surgery2008; 144: 598–603.
26.
IvascuF.A., HowellsG.A., JunnF.S.Predictors of mortality in trauma patients with intracranial hemorrhage on preinjury aspirin or clopidogrel.J Trauma2008; 65: 785–8.
27.
BachelaniA.M., BautzJ.T., SperryJ.L.Assessment of platelet transfusion for reversal of aspirin after traumatic brain injury.Surgery2011; 150: 836–43.
28.
JosephB., AzizH., PanditV.Low-dose aspirin therapy is not a reason for repeating head computed tomographic scans in traumatic brain injury: a prospective study.J Surg Res2014; 186: 287–91.
