Current quality measures intended to drive improved clinical performance are perceived as an inappropriate administrative burden. Surgeon-constructed quality measures, including the NSQIP, are more closely aligned with provider performance and relevant outcome. We hypothesized that NSQIP participation would be associated with measurable improvement in surgical outcomes. Elective general surgical cases were compared by case volume and incidence of postoperative adverse events (AEs) from 2014 to 2017. Using the Clavien-Dindo severity scaling system, we summed the grades for each AE and defined the patient population burden of these AEs as this sum divided by case volume. Case volume samples increased 67 per cent from 2014 (n = 526, 30 day complete) to 2017 (n = 878). Ratio of patient burden to case volume improved from 0.92 (2014) to 0.73 (2017). Comparison of AE incidence was not significantly different; however, the majority decreased over time. Analysis of individual AE interval change identified sepsis-related respiratory care as the top priority performance improvement target. These data reflect improved performance for a growing volume of surgical procedures. The impact of perioperative morbidity and their associated burden on affected patients has decreased, demonstrating the value of combining NSQIP with Clavien-Dindo to measure the quality of surgical care in objective and patient-specific terms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HenryL.R., von HolzenU.W., MinarichM.J.Quality measurement affecting surgical practice: utility versus utopia.Am J Surg2018; 215: 357–66.
2.
DalzellM.D.And with MIPS, we just don't know yet.Manag Care2018; 27: 35.
ClavienP.A., BarkunJ., de OliveiraM.L.The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.Ann Surg2009; 250: 187–96.
5.
SlankamenacK., GrafR., BarkunJ.The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity.Ann Surg2013; 258: 1–7.
6.
SlankamenacK., NederlofN., PessauxP.The comprehensive complication index: a novel and more sensitive endpoint for assessing outcome and reducing sample size in randomized controlled trials.Ann Surg2014; 260: 757–62.
7.
StaigerR.D., CiminoM., JavedA.The comprehensive complication index (CCI®) is a novel cost assessment tool for surgical procedures.Ann Surg2018; 268: 784–91.
8.
ClavienP.A., VetterD., StaigerR.D.The comprehensive complication index (CCII®): added value and clinical perspectives 3 years “down the line”.Ann Surg2017; 265: 1045–50.
DindoD., HahnloserD., ClavienP.A.Quality assessment in surgery: riding a lame horse.Ann Surg2010; 251: 766–71.
11.
HenryL.R., MinarichM.J., GriffinR.Physician derived versus administrative data in identifying surgical complications. Fact versus fiction.Am J Surg2019; 217: 447–51.
12.
HornorM.A., CohenM.E., HallB.L.Using confidential clinical data registries for public reporting and pay for performance.Ann Surg2018; 267: 231–2.
13.
TepasJJ3rd, KerwinA.J., de VillaJ.Restating surgical risk: from patient to population.J Am Coll Surg2016; 222: 505–12.
14.
GurienL.A., RaJ.H., KerwinA.J.National surgical quality improvement program integration with morbidity and mortality conference is essential to success in the march to zero.Am J Surg2016; 212: 623–8.
15.
KerwinA.J., MercelA., SkarupaD.J.Alternative payment models: can (should) trauma care be bundled?Trauma Surg Acute Care Open2018; 3: e000132.
16.
BrookeB.S.Achieving high-value surgical care through accountable care organizations: are the risks worth the rewards?Ann Surg2019; 269: 197–8.
17.
KnechtleW.S., PerezS.D., MedberyR.L.The association between hospital finances and complications after complex abdominal surgery: deficiencies in the current health care reimbursement system and implications for the future.Ann Surg2015; 262: 273–9.
18.
MunozE., MunozW3rd, WiseL.National and surgical health care expenditures, 2005–2025.Ann Surg2010; 251: 195–200.
19.
ResnickM.J., GravesA.J., BuntinM.B.Surgeon participation in early accountable care organizations.Ann Surg2018; 267: 401–7.
20.
RichardsM.R., SmithC.T., GravesA.J.Physician competition in the era of accountable care organizations.Health Serv Res2018; 53: 1272–85.
21.
CendanJ.C., Simms-CendanJ.S.Wanted: effective followers in surgery.Ann Surg2018; 267: 619–20.
22.
MooreF.D.Surgical streams in the flow of health care financing.The role of surgery in national expenditures: what costs are controllable? Ann Surg1985; 201: 132–41.
23.
PradarelliJ.C., ScallyC.P., NathanH.Hospital teaching status and medicare expenditures for complex surgery.Ann Surg2017; 265: 502–13.
24.
GurienL.A., TepasJJ3rd, LindD.S.How safe is the safety net? Comparison of Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at a safety-net hospital using the NSQIP database.J Am Coll Surg2018; 226: 680–4.
