Abstract
Background
Resuscitation of traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is variable, with approaches that overlap Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) algorithms. There is no standard algorithm for TCA, with some withholding ACLS protocols given abysmal outcomes. This study aims to assess surgeon practices and attitudes toward resuscitation practices in TCA.
Materials and Methods
A 16-question web-based survey was distributed to the membership of a national trauma association. Respondent demographics and management of TCA were analyzed. Chi-squared tests determined statistical significance. Open-ended responses were coded and analyzed inductively.
Results
Two hundred and three surveys were completed. 73.4% of respondents reported utilizing ACLS, while 26.6% reported they never utilized ACLS. A statistically significant difference in the performance of ACLS was found based on number of years in practice (P = .025) and the state of practice (P = .006). There was no significant difference in self-reported survival rates or legal, ethical, or interpersonal conflicts. Qualitative data highlighted themes of interpersonal conflict and futility.
Discussion
This study shows that one-quarter of respondents never utilize ACLS in TCA. Of those that utilize ACLS, there was variability in the technique, indication, and duration of resuscitation. Despite significant variability in technique, there appears to be similar survival rates and incidence of conflict. The association between years in practice and ACLS use suggests this may represent an emerging change in practice. The low response rate limits generalizability; however, there is significant variability in practice, highlighting a need for evidence-based guidelines.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.