Abstract
Aims
No consensus regarding the optimal endoscopic resection approach for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (R-NETs) measuring 10-20 mm, this study aims to investigate this issue.
Methods
Patients with R-NETs underwent either endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The primary endpoint was the complete resection rate, and the secondary endpoints were surgery-related complications and long-term outcomes.
Results
96 patients met the inclusion criteria, 84 patients completed endoscopic resection, and 5 patients were excluded. 79 patients were enrolled and divided into EMR (n = 21) and ESD groups (n = 58). 100% of ESD excisions reached the primary endpoint, while 90.5% of EMR. Endoscopic submucosal dissection can achieve higher R0 rate and lower positive margin rate than EMR. The mean operative time of ESD and EMR was 35.22 ± 8.96 min and 13.14 ± 3.26 min, respectively. The complication rates of ESD and EMR were 3.4% and 4.8%, respectively. For R-NETs between 10 mm and 20 mm, the R0 rate of ESD was significantly higher than that of EMR (100% vs 71.4%, P = .01) and the margin positive rate of ESD was significant lower than that of EMR (4.8% vs 42.9%, P < .05). Both ESD and EMR obtained 100% R0 resection of less than 10 mm R-NET. The median follow-up was 13 months (3-84 months); 1 patient relapsed 25 months after EMR and was re-treated with ESD.
Conclusion
For R-NETs with a diameter less than 10 mm, both EMR and ESD were safe and effective and EMR is convenient and fast, with advantages. ESD offers superiority for R-NETs between 10 and 20 mm and can be considered as the preferred method.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.