Abstract
Introduction
The optimal diagnostic pathway for pediatric acute appendicitis (AA) following an inconclusive or negative ultrasonography (US) is poorly defined, leading to debate over subsequent computed tomography (CT) use. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared negative appendectomy rates in children managed with a US-only pathway vs a pathway involving CT after a non-diagnostic initial US.
Methods
Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42024568560), we systematically searched 6 databases, including PubMed and Embase, through July 2024 for longitudinal studies comparing the 2 diagnostic pathways. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Risk of bias in included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
The pooled analysis demonstrated that a US-only pathway was associated with significantly lower odds of negative appendectomy compared to the US-followed-by-CT pathway (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.90; P = 0.02). This protective association was even more pronounced in the subgroup of patients with an initial inconclusive US (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05-0.89; P = 0.03).
Conclusion
In children with suspected AA after a non-diagnostic US, a US-only pathway is associated with a significantly lower rate of negative appendectomy. These findings support strategies that prioritize clinical re-evaluation and repeat US to reduce unnecessary surgeries and radiation exposure. However, given the low certainty of evidence, clinical judgment remains paramount.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
