A Retrospective Study on the Use of Robotic Surgery in Rural Areas Compared to Urban Centers

Abstract

Background

Robotic surgery may lend several advantages to the rural surgeon such as improved visualization, ergonomics, mobility, and decreased conversions to open. This study evaluated the growth of robotic surgery across the state of Kansas in regard to urban vs rural use.

Methods

A retrospective review of surgical cases performed on da Vinci robotic systems from 2018 to 2022 throughout the state of Kansas. The information is grouped together based on the Rural Urban Commuting Codes (RUCA) for the location of procedure. The cases were divided by type (general surgery, cardiothoracic, urology, and gynecology).

Results

General surgery was the fastest growing procedure type over the 5-year span increasing in proportion from 45.7% to 64.2%. This was followed by gynecology initially at 36.4% to 24.5%. Urology ranged from 16.6% to 9.5% and thoracic remained at 1% for the 5-year span. RUCA 1 facilities maintained a steady growth of cases per robot over the 5-year span initially at 225 cases per robot and increasing to 375 cases per robot. RUCA 4 centers illustrated a slower growth initially down trending the first 2 years then showing steady growth ending around 250 cases per robot. RUCA 7 centers had the fastest growth curve starting at 175 cases per robot and increasing to 360 cases per robot finishing just behind RUCA 1 centers.

Discussion

The robot may be an effective tool in a rural facility to generate caseload, revenue, recruit physicians, and provide health equity.

Keywords

rural surgery robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Staff

. One in Five Americans Live in Rural Areas. Census.gov; 2024. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2017/08/rural-america.html. Accessed March 13, 2025.

Ibrahim

Hughes

Thumma

Dimick

. Association of hospital critical access status with surgical outcomes and expenditures among medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2016;315(19):2095-2103. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.5618.

Lansing

Diaz

Hyer

Tsilimigras

Pawlik

. Rural hospitals are not associated with worse postoperative outcomes for Colon cancer surgery. J Rural Health. 2022;38(3):650-659. doi:10.1111/jrh.12596.

Taylor

. The future of ambulatory robotics is now. Outpatient surgery magazine. 2023. https://www.aorn.org/outpatient-surgery/article/the-future-of-ambulatory-robotics-is-now. Accessed March 13, 2025.

Lunardi

Abou-Zamzam

Florecki

, et al. Robotic technology in emergency general surgery cases in the era of minimally invasive surgery. JAMA Surg. 2024;159(5):493-499. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0016.

Phan

Kahlaee

Kim

Toh

JWT

. Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(3):221-230. doi:10.1007/s10151-018-1920-0.

Ueda

Qaraqe

Han

, et al. Operative trends and clinical outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches to hiatal and paraoesophageal hernias-a study of 1834 patients. J Robot Surg. 2025;19(1):145. doi:10.1007/s11701-025-02299-0.

Torres

Florecki

Haghshenas

, et al. The evolution and development of a robotic acute care surgery program. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;95(4):e26-e30. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000004020. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

Alligood-Percoco

Huggler

McQuillen

. Implementation of a robotic gynecologic surgery program in a rural setting: impact on presence of assistant surgeon and route of hysterectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2023;27(3):e2023.00035. doi:10.4293/JSLS.2023.00035.

10.

Rahimi

Hsu

Maegawa

, et al. First assistant in bariatric surgery: a comparison between laparoscopic and robotic approaches: a 4-Year analysis of the MBSAQIP database (2016-2019). Obes Surg. 2024;34(3):866-873. doi:10.1007/s11695-023-06996-3. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

11.

Zender

Thell

. Developing a successful robotic surgery program in a rural hospital. AORN J. 2010;92(1):72-83. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2009.10.024. quiz 84-6. Epub 2010 Jul 1.

12.

Turchetti

Palla

Pierotti

Cuschieri

. Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(3):598-606. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

13.

Eckhoff

Müller

Brunner

Fuchs

Meireles

. Do the costs of robotic surgery present an insurmountable obstacle? A narrative review. Int J Abdom Wall Her. 2023;6(2):71-76. doi:10.4103/ijawhs.IJAWHS_62_22.

14.

Childers

Maggard-Gibbons

. Estimation of the acquisition and operating costs for robotic surgery. JAMA. 2018;320(8):835-836. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.9219.

15.

Abdelmoaty

Dunst

Neighorn

Swanstrom

Hammill

. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(10):3436-3443. doi:10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

16.

Sanaiha

Bakhtiyar

Ebrahimian

Branche

Benharash

. National analysis of cost disparities in robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic abdominal operations. Surgery. 2023;173(6):1340-1345. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.016. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

17.

Perez

Schwaitzberg

. Robotic surgery: finding value in 2019 and beyond. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2019;4:51.

18.

Munshower

Ren

Bauerle

, et al. Cost analysis of robotic assisted general surgery cases in a single academic institution. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(2):557-564. doi:10.1007/s11701-022-01434-5. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

19.

Greenspun

Metzger

De Freitas

, et al.

Contemporary inguinal hernia repair: do cost and operative time still differ by approach?

Surg Endosc. 2025;39(6):3587-3591. doi:10.1007/s00464-025-11722-4. Epub 2025 Apr 21.

20.

Gerull

Cho

Arefanian

Kushner

Awad

. Favorable peri-operative outcomes observed in paraesophageal hernia repair with robotic approach. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(6):3085-3089. doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07700-7. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

21.

Iavazzo

Papadopoulou

Gkegkes

. Cost assessment of robotics in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(11):2125-2134. doi:10.1111/jog.12507.

22.

Grimsley

Barry

Janjua

Eguia

DuCoin

Kuo

. Exploring the paradigm of robotic surgery and its contribution to the growth of surgical volume. Surg Open Sci. 2022;10:36-42. doi:10.1016/j.sopen.2022.06.002.

23.

Barry

Janjua

DuCoin

Eguia

Kuo

. Does adoption of new technology increase surgical volume? The robotic inguinal hernia repair model. J Robot Surg. 2022;16(4):833-839. doi:10.1007/s11701-021-01304-6.

24.

Rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) codes.” USDA ERS - Documentation, 2020. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-commuting-area-codes

25.

HFMA . The quadruple aim: how robotic-assisted surgery helps organizations provide high-quality care at a lower cost. HFMA. Published December 1, 2022. https://www.hfma.org/technology/artificial-intelligence/the-quadruple-aim-how-robotic-assisted-surgery-helps-organizations-provide-high-quality-care-at-a-lower-cost

26.

Handa

Gaidhane

Choudhari

. Role of robotic-assisted surgery in public health: its advantages and challenges. Cureus. 2024;16(6):e62958. doi:10.7759/cureus.62958.

27.

Fairag

Almahdi

Siddiqi

, et al. Robotic revolution in surgery: diverse applications across specialties and future prospects review article. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e52148. doi:10.7759/cureus.52148.

28.

Borgstrom

Deveney

Hughes

, et al. Rural surgery. Curr Probl Surg. 2022;59(8):101173. doi:10.1016/j.cpsurg.2022.101173.

29.

Doeksen

St Clair

Eilrich

. Economic Impact of Rural Health Care. National Center for Rural Health Works; 2016. https://ruralhealthworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Summary-Economic-Impact-Rural-Health-FINAL-100716.pdf

30.

Krause

Bird

. The importance of robotic-assisted procedures in residency training to applicants of a community general surgery residency program. J Robot Surg. 2019;13(3):379-382. doi:10.1007/s11701-018-0859-5.

31.

Madion

Kastenmeier

Goldblatt

Higgins

. Robotic surgery training curriula: prevalence, perceptions, and educational experiences in general surgery residency programs. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(9):6638-6646. doi:10.1007/s00464-021-08930-z.

32.

Clark

Hernandez

Bertalan

, et al. Travel time as an indicator of poor access to care in surgical emergencies. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(1):e2455258. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55258.

33.

Finlayson

Birkmeyer

Tosteson

Nease

Jr . Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care. 1999;37(2):204-209. doi:10.1097/00005650-199902000-00010.

34.

Weigel

Ullrich

Finegan

Ward

. Rural bypass for elective surgeries. J Rural Health. 2017;33(2):135-145. doi:10.1111/jrh.12163.