This study aimed to describe perioperative outcomes associated with emergency cholecystectomy (EC) in elderly/high-risk patients based on Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18).
Methods
A single-center retrospective surgical database included 2189 patients who underwent cholecystectomy between 2005 and 2025, and the study population included 550 patients who underwent EC for AC, excluding patients with elective cholecystectomy. The patients were divided into Grade I and II-III groups by AC severity. The patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups, and risk factors of severe postoperative complications were assessed using logistic multivariate analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with the length of postoperative hospital stay.
Results
The patients with Grade I (n = 355) and those with Grade II-III (n = 195) were included. As a subgroup analysis, the Grade II-III group was divided into 2 groups: surgically low-risk patients (Low-risk, n = 82) and high-risk patients (High-risk, n = 113). The overall complication rate was approximately 15%. The rate of severe postoperative complications was 5.3%, and the 30-day mortality was zero in the entire cohort. The Grade II-III group had significantly more severe postoperative complications than the Grade I group (8.2% vs 3.7%, P = 0.028). There were no statistically significant differences in perioperative outcomes between the low-risk and high-risk groups, except for hospital stay. Multivariate analysis showed that LC (odds ratio = 0.414, P = 0.037) was associated with lower rates of severe postoperative complications.
Conclusions
EC may be a feasible option in selected elderly or comorbid patients with Grade II-III AC, with acceptable short-term outcomes.
DemirkanATanrıverdiAKÇetinkayaAPolatOGünalpM. The effect of leucocytosis, gender difference, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis in the elderly population. Emergency Medicine International. 2019;2019:6428340. doi:10.1155/2019/6428340.
2.
GallaherJRCharlesA. Acute cholecystitis: a review. JAMA. 2022;327:965-975. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.2350.
3.
MaqsoodHPatelKFerdosiH, et al.Age-related differences pre-intra-and postcholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 6,868 patients. Int J Surg. 2017;39:119-126. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.046.
4.
EscartínAGonzálezMCuelloE, et al.Acute cholecystitis in very elderly patients: disease management, outcomes, and risk factors for complications. Surgery Research and Practice. 2019;2019:9709242. doi:10.1155/2019/9709242.
5.
LeeS-WYangS-SChangC-SYehH-J. Impact of the Tokyo guidelines on the management of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1857-1861. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05923.x.
6.
RiallTSZhangDTownsendCMJKuoY-FGoodwinJS. Failure to perform cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:668-677. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.031.
7.
RoulinDSaadiADi MareLDemartinesNHalkicN. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, are the 72 hours still the rule? a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2016;264:717-722. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001886.
8.
KamarajahSKKarriSBundredJR, et al.Perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:4727-4740. doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07805-z.
9.
RobertsDCMcKayMPShafferA. Increasing rates of emergency department visits for elderly patients in the United States, 1993 to 2003. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51:769–774. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.09.011.
10.
González-CastilloAMSancho-InsenserJDe Miguel-PalacioM, et al.Mortality risk estimation in acute calculous cholecystitis: beyond the Tokyo guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16:24. doi:10.1186/s13017-021-00368-x.
11.
LinY-NWuY-TFuC-Y, et al.Evaluating the advantages of treating acute cholecystitis by following the Tokyo guidelines 2018 (TG18): a study emphasizing clinical outcomes and medical expenditures. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:6623-6632. doi:10.1007/s00464-020-08162-7.
12.
OkamotoKSuzukiKTakadaT, et al.Tokyo guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. 2018;25:55-72. doi:10.1002/jhbp.516.
13.
LoozenCSvan SantvoortHCvan DuijvendijkP, et al.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): Multicentre randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2018;363:k3965. doi:10.1136/bmj.k3965.
14.
WakabayashiGIwashitaYHibiT, et al.Tokyo guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. 2018;25:73-86. doi:10.1002/jhbp.517.
15.
HackettNJDe OliveiraGSJainUKKimJYS. ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery. Int J Surg. 2015;18:184-190. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.079.
16.
CharlsonMEPompeiPAlesKLMacKenzieCR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:373-383. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
17.
BolligerMKroehnertJ-AMolineusFKandiolerDSchindlMRissP. Experiences with the standardized classification of surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo) in general surgery patients. Eur Surg. 2018;50:256-261. doi:10.1007/s10353-018-0551-z.
18.
SchulmanSKearonCSubcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Subcommittee on control of anticoagulation of the scientific and standardization committee of the international society on thrombosis and haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemostasis. 2005;3:692-694. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01204.x.
19.
KandaY. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452-458. doi:10.1038/bmt.2012.244.
20.
WuX-DTianXLiuM-MWuLZhaoSZhaoL. Meta-analysis comparing early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1302-1313. doi:10.1002/bjs.9886.
21.
LansbergMGO’DonnellMJKhatriP, et al.Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e601S-e636S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2302.
22.
PisanoMCeresoliMCimbanassiS, et al.2017 WSES and SICG guidelines on acute calcolous cholecystitis in elderly population. World J Emerg Surg. 2019;4:10. [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jul 14]. doi:10.1186/s13017-019-0224-7.
23.
HamadaTYasunagaHNakaiY, et al.Severe bleeding after percutaneous transhepatic drainage of the biliary system: effect of antithrombotic agents—analysis of 34 606 cases from a Japanese nationwide administrative database. Radiology. 2015;274(2):605-613. [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jul 16]. doi:10.1148/radiol.14140293.
24.
SagamiRHayasakaKUjiharaT, et al.Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis is feasible for patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. Dig Endosc. 2020;32:1092-1099. doi:10.1111/den.13650.
25.
YangMJYooBMKimJH, et al.Endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage versus gallbladder stenting before cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis and a high suspicion of choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomised preliminary study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(4):472-478. [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jul 16]. doi:10.3109/00365521.2015.1115116.
26.
OjiKOtowaYYamazakiY, et al.Taking antithrombic therapy during emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis does not affect the postoperative outcomes: a propensity score matched study. BMC Surg. 2022;22:42. doi:10.1186/s12893-022-01501-6.
27.
VaccariSLauroACervelleraM, et al.Effect of antithrombotic therapy on postoperative outcome of 538 consecutive emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis: two Italian center’s study. Updates Surg. 2021;73:1767-1774. doi:10.1007/s13304-021-00994-9.
28.
HallBRArmijoPRKrauseCBurnettTOleynikovD. Emergent cholecystectomy is superior to percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement in critically ill patients with emergent calculous cholecystitis. Am J Surg. 2018;216:116-119. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.11.002.
29.
LasithiotakisKPetrakisJVenianakiM, et al.Frailty predicts outcome of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in geriatric patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1144-1150. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2565-0.
30.
KowdleyGCMerchantNRichardsonJPSomervilleJGorospeMCunninghamSC. Cancer surgery in the elderly. Sci World J. 2012;2012:303852. doi:10.1100/2012/303852.
31.
HaradaKUemotoYFujikawaT. How antithrombotic therapy influences the clinical outcomes of emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Today. 2025;55:1734-1742. doi:10.1007/s00595-025-03090-2.
