We evaluated 158 legs from 79 consecutive patients who had undergone both ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements and angiography for claudication symptoms between January 2007 and December 2008. The diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the individual legs was established by angiography. Ankle-brachial index was considered abnormal if it was <0.9. The sensitivity and specificity of ABI was 61% and 87%, respectively. To assess the factors affecting the validity of ABI in the diagnosis of PAD, multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. The odds ratios (ORs) for the false negative result of ABI were 4.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-13.92) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), 3.41 (95% CI 1.10-10.48) in patients with distal lesions, 3.02 (95% CI 1.07-8.49) in elderly patients, and 1.13 (95% CI 0.34-3.42) in patients with mild stenosis. Although ABI is the method of choice for the primary diagnosis of PAD, other supplementary investigations should be considered when there is clinical suspicion of PAD but an ABI <0.9.
Greenland P. , Abrams J., Aurigemma GP, et al. Prevention conference V: beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention: noninvasive tests of atherosclerotic burden: Writing Group III. Circulation . 2000;101(1):E16-E22.
2.
Sangle SR, Davies RJ, Mora M., Baron MA, Hughes GR, D’Cruz DPAnkle-brachial pressure index: a simple tool for assessing cardiovascular risk in patients with systemic vasculitis. Rheumatology ( Oxford). 2008;47(7):1058-1060.
3.
Yao ST, Hobbs JT, Irvine WTAnkle systolic pressure measurements in arterial disease affecting the lower extremities. Br J Surg. 1969;56(9):676-679.
4.
Lange SF, Trampisch HJ, Pittrow D., et al. Profound influence of different methods for determination of the ankle brachial index on the prevalence estimate of peripheral arterial disease. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:147. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/147 .
5.
Price JF, Stewart MC, Douglas AF, Murray GD, Fowkes GFFrequency of a low ankle brachial index in the general population by age, sex and deprivation: cross-sectional survey of 28,980 men and women. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008;15(3):370-375.
6.
Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 practice guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006;113(11):e463-e654.
7.
Murabito JM, Evans JC, Nieto K., Larson MG, Levy D., Wilson PWPrevalence and clinical correlates of peripheral arterial disease in the Framingham Offspring Study. Am Heart J. 2002;143(6):961-965.
8.
Doobay AV, Anand SSSensitivity and specificity of the ankle-brachial index to predict future cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(7): 1463-1469.
9.
Ankle Brachial Index Collaboration, Fowkes FG, Murray GD, Butcher I., et al. Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham Risk Score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(2):197-208.
10.
Vaccaro AR, Baron EM, Sanfilippo J., et al. Reliability of a novel classification system for thoracolumbar injuries: the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score. Spine. 2006;31(11 suppl):S62-S69; discussion S104.
11.
Baker JD, Dix DEVariability of Doppler ankle pressures with arterial occlusive disease: an evaluation of ankle index and brachial-ankle pressure gradient. Surgery. 1981;89(1):134-137.
12.
de Graaff JC , Ubbink DT, Legemate DA, de Haan RJ, Jacobs MJInterobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of peripheral blood and oxygen pressure measurements in the assessment of lower extremity arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33(5): 1033-1040.
13.
Fowkes FGThe measurement of atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease in epidemiological surveys. Int J Epidemiol. 1988; 17(2):248-254.
14.
Williams DT , Harding KG, Price P.An evaluation of the efficacy of methods used in screening for lower-limb arterial disease in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(9):2206-2210.
15.
Sahli D., Eliasson B., Svensson M., et al. Assessment of toe blood pressure is an effective screening method to identify diabetes patients with lower extremity arterial disease. Angiology. 2004;55(6):641-651.
16.
Stein R., Hriljac I., Halperin JL, Gustavson SM, Teodorescu V., Olin JWLimitation of the resting ankle-brachial index in symptomatic patients with peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Med. 2006 ;11(1):29-33.
17.
Alnaeb ME, Crabtree VP, Boutin A., Mikhailidis DP, Seifalian AM, Hamilton G.Prospective assessment of lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease in diabetic patients using a novel automated optical device. Angiology . 2007;58(5):579-585.
18.
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(7):1183-1197.
19.
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults.Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285(19):2486-2497.
20.
Chobanian AV , Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560-2572.
21.
Diehm C., Schuster A., Allenberg JR, et al. High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and co-morbidity in 6880 primary care patients: cross-sectional study. Atherosclerosis . 2004;172(1): 95-105.
22.
Criqui MH, Fronek A., Klauber MR, Barrett-Connor E., Gabriel S.The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of traditional clinical evaluation of peripheral arterial disease: results from noninvasive testing in a defined population. Circulation. 1985 ;71(3): 516-522.
23.
Catalano M.Epidemiology of critical limb ischaemia: north Italian data. Eur J Med. 1993;2(1):11-14.
24.
Ebskov L., Schroeder T., Holstein P.Epidemiology of leg amputation: the influence of vascular surgery. Br J Surg. 1994;81(11): 1600-1603.
25.
Feigelson HS , Criqui MH, Fronek A., Langer RD, Molgaard CAScreening for peripheral arterial disease: the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of noninvasive tests in a defined population. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 ;140(6):526-534.
26.
Carter SAClinical measurement of systolic pressures in limbs with arterial occlusive disease. JAMA. 1969;207(10):1869-1874.
27.
Avolio AP, Chen SG, Wang RP, Zhang CL, Li MF, O’Rourke MFEffects of aging on changing arterial compliance and left ventricular load in a northern Chinese urban community. Circulation. 1983;68(1):50-58.
28.
McGarigal K., Cushman S., Stafford S.Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research. New York: Springer; 2000.
29.
Jönsson B., Laurent C., Eneling M., Skau T., Lindberg LGAutomatic ankle pressure measurements using PPG in ankle-brachial pressure index determination. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30(4):395-401.
