Data are scarce regarding emergency medical service (EMS) usage by patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the Arabian Gulf region. This 9-month in-hospital prospective ACS registry was conducted in Arabian Gulf countries, with 30-day and 1-year follow-up mortality rates. Of 5184 patients with ACS, 1293 (25%) arrived at the hospital by EMS. The EMS group (vs non-EMS) was more likely to be male, have cardiac arrest on presentation, be current or exsmokers, and have moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The EMS group had higher crude mortality rates during hospitalization and after hospital discharge but not after adjustment for clinical factors and treatments. The EMSs are underused in the Arabian Gulf region. Short- and long-term mortality rates in patients with ACS are similar between those who used and did not use EMS. Quality improvement in the EMS infrastructure and establishment of integrated STEMI networks are urgently needed.
LopezADMathersCDEzzatiMJamisonDTMurrayCJL. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006;367(9524):1747–1757.
2.
YusufSReddySOunpuuSAnandS. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation. 2001;104(22):2746–2753.
3.
ReddyKS. Cardiovascular disease in non-Western countries. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(24):2438–2440.
4.
YusufSReddySOunpuuSAnandS.Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: Part II: variations in cardiovascular disease by specific ethnic groups and geographic regions and prevention strategies. Circulation. 2001;104(23):2855–2864.
5.
O'GaraPTKushnerFGAscheimDD. American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127(4):e362–e425.
6.
BeckerLLarsenMPEisenbergMS. Incidence of cardiac arrest during self-transport for chest pain. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28(6):612–616.
7.
MathewsRPetersonEDLiS. Use of emergency medical service transport among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the national cardiovascular data registry acute coronary treatment intervention outcomes network registry-get with the guidelines. Circulation. 2011;124(2):154–163.
8.
BrownALMannNCDayaM. Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients: rapid early action for coronary treatment (REACT) study. Circulation. 2000;102(2):173–178.
9.
CantoJGZalenskiRJOrnatoJP. Use of emergency medical services in acute myocardial infarction and subsequent quality of care: observations from the national registry of myocardial infarction 2. Circulation. 2002;106(24):3018–3023.
10.
FaresSZubaidMAl-MahmeedW. Utilization of emergency medical services by patients with acute coronary syndromes in the Arab Gulf States. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(3):310–316.
11.
AlhabibKFSulaimanKAl-MotarrebA. Baseline characteristics, management practices, and long-term outcomes of middle eastern patients in the second Gulf registry of acute coronary events (Gulf RACE-2). Ann Saudi Med. 2012;32(1):9–18.
12.
CannonCPBattlerABrindisRG. American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(7):2114–2130.
13.
CabritaBBouyer-DallozFL’HuillierI. Beneficial effects of direct call to emergency medical services in acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Emerg Med. 2004;11(1):12–18.
14.
BeerJCDentanGJanin-MagnificatL. Beneficial effects of direct call to emergency medical services on time delays and management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. The RICO (obseRvatoire des Infarctus de Côte-d'Or) data]. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2002;51(1):8–14.
15.
BrownALMannNCDayaM. Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients. rapid early action for coronary treatment (REACT) study. Circulation. 2000;102(2):173–178.
16.
JohanssonIStrombergASwahnE. Ambulance use in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19(1):5–12.
17.
LozziLCarstensenSRasmussenHNelsonG. Why do acute myocardial infarction patients not call an ambulance? an interview with patients presenting to hospital with acute myocardial infarction symptoms. Intern Med J. 2005;35(11):668–671.
18.
McGinnAPRosamondWDGoffDCJrTaylorHAMilesJSChamblessL. Trends in prehospital delay time and use of emergency medical services for acute myocardial infarction: experience in 4 US communities from 1987-2000. Am Heart J. 2005;150(3):392–400.
19.
SaczynskiJSYarzebskiJLessardD. Trends in prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction (from the Worcester heart attack study). Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(12):1589–1594.
20.
YanHBSongLChenH. Factors influencing ambulance use in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Beijing, China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009;122(3):272–278.
21.
ThalibLZubaidMRashedW. Regional variability in hospital mortality in patients hospitalized with ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the gulf registry of acute coronary events. Med Princ Pract. 2011;20(3):225–230.
22.
KrumholzHMBradleyEHNallamothuBK. A campaign to improve the timeliness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: door-to-balloon: an alliance for quality. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1(1):97–104.
23.
BradleyEHNallamothuBK, Stern AF, et al. The Door-to-balloon alliance for quality: who joins national collaborative efforts and why?Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35(2):93–99.
24.
JacobsAKAntmanEMFaxonDPGregoryTSolisP. Development of systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: executive summary. Circulation. 2007;116(2):217–230.
25.
JollisJGGrangerCBHenryTD. Systems of care for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a report from the American heart association's mission: lifeline. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(4):423–428.
26.
Le MayMRWellsGASoDY. Reduction in mortality as a result of direct transport from the field to a receiving center for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(14):1223–1230.
27.
ArmstrongPWGershlickAHGoldsteinP. Fibrinolysis or primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(15):1379–1387. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1301092.
28.
SollaDJPaiva Filho IdeMDelisleJE. Integrated regional networks for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction care in developing countries: the experience of Salvador, Bahia, BrazilCirc Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(1):9–17.
