Long-Term Prognostic Implications of the Admission Shock Index in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Received Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2017
Long-Term Prognostic Implications of the Admission Shock Index in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Received Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
The admission shock index (SI) enables prediction of short-term prognosis. This study investigated the prognostic implications of admission SI for predicting long-term prognoses for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The participants were 680 patients with AMI who received percutaneous coronary intervention. Shock index is the ratio of heart rate and systolic blood pressure. Patients were classified as admission SI <0.66 (normal) and ≥0.66 (elevated; 75th percentile). The end point was 5-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Elevated admission SI was seen in 176 patients. Peak creatine kinase levels were significantly higher and left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in the elevated SI group, which had a worse MACEs. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, SI ≥0.66 was a risk factor for MACE. Elevated admission SI was associated with poorer long-term prognosis.
JegerRVRadovanovicDHunzikerPR. Ten-year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):618–626.
2.
SinghMWhiteJHasdaiD. Long-term outcome and its predictors among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by shock: insights from the GUSTO-I trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(18):1752–1758.
3.
MarcolinoMSSimsekCde BoerSP. Short- and long-term major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Cardiology. 2012;121(1):47–55.
4.
MaseriARebuzziAGCianfloneD. Need for a composite risk stratification of patients with unstable coronary syndromes tailored to clinical practice. Circulation. 1997;96(12):4141–4142.
MorrowDAAntmanEMCharlesworthA. TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation: an intravenous nPA for treatment of infarcting myocardium early II trial substudy. Circulation. 2000;102(17):2031–2037.
7.
BradshawPJKoDTNewmanAMDonovanLRTuJV. Validation of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk index for predicting early mortality in a population-based cohort of STEMI and non-STEMI patients. Can J Cardiol. 2007;23(1):51–56.
8.
AragamKGTamhaneUUKline-RogersE. Does simplicity compromise accuracy in ACS risk prediction? A retrospective analysis of the TIMI and GRACE risk scores. PLoS One. 2009;4(11):e7947.
9.
D’AscenzoFBiondi-ZoccaiGMorettiC. TIMI, GRACE, and alternative risk scores in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of 40 derivation studies on 216,552 patients and of 42 validation studies on 31,625 patients. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33(3):507–514.
10.
RadyMYNightingalePLittleRAEdwardsJD. Shock index: a re-evaluation in acute circulatory failure. Resuscitation. 1992;23(3):227–234.
11.
AllgöwerMBurriC. Shock index [in German]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1967;92(43):1947–1950.
12.
HuangBYangYZhuJ. Usefulness of the admission shock index for predicting short-term outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(9):1315–1321.
13.
BergerPBEllisSGHolmesDRJr. Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) trial. Circulation. 1999;100(1):14–20.
14.
De LucaGSuryapranataHZijlstraF. Symptom-onset-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(6):991–997.
15.
van DiepenSWidimskyPLopesRD. Transfer times and outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing interhospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: APEX-AMI insights. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(4):437–444.
16.
ToosiMSMerlinoJDLeeperKV. Prognostic value of the shock index along with transthoracic echocardiography in risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101(5):700–705.
17.
MyintPKBhanianiABradshawSMAlobeidiFTariqSM. Usefulness of shock index and adjusted shock index in the severity assessment of community-acquired pneumonia. Respiration. 2009;77(4):468–469.
18.
CannonCMBraxtonCCKling-SmithMMahnkenJDCarltonEMoncureM. Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients. J Trauma. 2009;67(6):1426–1430.
19.
YussofSJZakariaMIMohamedFLBujangMALakshmananSAsaariAH. Value of shock index in prognosticating the short-term outcomes of death for patients presenting with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department. Med J Malaysia. 2012;67(4):406–411.
20.
BilkovaDMotovskaZWidimskyPDvorakJLisaLBudesinskyT. Shock index: a simple clinical parameter for quick mortality risk assessment in acute myocardial infarction. Can J Cardiol. 2011;27(6):739–742.
21.
SpyidopoulosINomanAAhmedJM. Shock-index as a novel predictor of long-term outcome following primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015;4(3):270–277.
22.
ZarzaurBLCroceMAFischerPEMagnottiLJFabianTC. New vitals after injury: shock index for the young and age x shock index for the old. J Surg Res. 2008;147(2):229–236.
23.
GrahamLNSmithPAStokerJBMackintoshAFMaryDA. Sympathetic neural hyperactivity and its normalization following unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction. Clin Sci (Lond). 2004;106(6):605–611.
24.
CeremuzyńskiL. Hormonal and metabolic reaction evoked by acute myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 1981;48(6 pt 1):767–776.
25.
ArbabiSJurkovichGJWahlWL. A comparison of prehospital and hospital data in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2004;56(5):1029–1032.
26.
PfefferMAPfefferJM. Ventricular enlargement and reduced survival after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987;75(5 pt 2):iv93–iv97.
27.
BologneseLNeskovicANParodiG. Left ventricular remodeling after primary coronary angioplasty: patterns of left ventricular dilation and long-term prognostic implications. Circulation. 2002;106(18):2351–2357.
28.
SpringelingTKirschbaumSWRossiA. Late cardiac remodeling after primary percutaneous coronary intervention-five-year cardiac magnetic resonance imaging follow-up. Circ J. 2013;77(1):81–88.
29.
MigrinoRQYoungJBEllisSG. End-systolic volume index at 90 to 180 minutes into reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction is a strong predictor of early and late mortality. The Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO)-I Angiographic Investigators. Circulation. 1997;96(1):116–121.
30.
NomanABalasubramaniamKDasR. Admission heart rate predicts mortality following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an observational study. Cardiovasc Ther. 2013;31(6):363–369.
31.
PanzaJADiodatiJGCallahanTSEpsteinSEQuyyumiAA. Role of increases in heart rate in determining the occurrence and frequency of myocardial ischemia during daily life in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20(5):1092–1098.
