An Automated User-friendly Software for Fast Computation of Blood Flow Velocity From Coronary Angiographic Images

Abstract

Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count enables assessment of coronary flow but cannot measure coronary flow velocity (CFV), which is needed to examine microvascular function. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a semi-automated software for fast CFV computation using contrast bolus tracking techniques in angiography and compare its performance against experts. The study included patients undergoing coronary angiography. Two experts measured the CFV using the number of frames, segment length, and frame rate. Measurements were repeated for shorter segments and different projections, and their estimations were compared with the software. In total, 123 patients (152 vessels) were included. The software had excellent reproducibility in measuring CFV (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = .995), which was superior to experts (ICC = .946) and provided similar estimations irrespective of the segment length (ICC = .992); conversely, the experts overestimated CFV in short segments. The reproducibility of the experts and the software was moderate when comparing CFV measurements in different projections (first expert vs software ICC = .807, second expert vs software ICC = .790, first expert vs second expert ICC = .885). The software provides reproducible CFV estimations that are close to experts’ estimations. Further validation against wire-based functional techniques is needed to examine its potential in assessing microvascular function.

Keywords

coronary angiography coronary flow velocity TIMI frame count quantitative coronary angiography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gibson

Cannon

Daley

, et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation. 1996;93:879-88.

Kunadian

Harrigan

Zorkun

, et al. Use of the TIMI frame count in the assessment of coronary artery blood flow and microvascular function over the past 15 years. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009;27:316-28.

Padhee

Johnson

Banerjee

Yang

Machine learning for aiding blood flow velocity estimation based on angiography. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022;9:622.

Khanmohammadi

Engan

Sæland

Eftestøl

Larsen

AI.

Automatic estimation of coronary blood flow velocity step 1 for developing a tool to diagnose patients with micro-vascular angina pectoris. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019;6:1.

Morris

Gosling

Zwierzak

, et al. A novel method for measuring absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117:1567-77.

ten Brinke

Slump

Stoel

MG.

Automated TIMI frame counting using 3-d modeling. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2012;36:580-8.

Huang

Koning

Cui

Reiber

JH.

A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: in-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:291-8.

Girasis

Schuurbiers

Onuma

, et al. Advances in two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: improved small lumen diameter detection and automatic reference vessel diameter derivation. EuroIntervention. 2012;7:1326-35.

Janssen

Koning

de Koning

Tuinenburg

Reiber

JH.

A novel approach for the detection of pathlines in X-ray angiograms: the wavefront propagation algorithm. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002;18:317-24.

10.

Gibson

Murphy

Rizzo

, et al. Relationship between TIMI frame count and clinical outcomes after thrombolytic administration. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group. Circulation. 1999;99:1945-50.

11.

Appleby

Michaels

Chen

Michael

CG.

Importance of the TIMI frame count: implications for future trials. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2000;1:31-4.

12.

Manginas

Gatzov

Chasikidis

Voudris

Pavlides

Cokkinos

DV.

Estimation of coronary flow reserve using the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count method. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:1562-5, A7.

13.

Chugh

Koppel

Scott

, et al. Coronary flow velocity reserve does not correlate with TIMI frame count in patients undergoing non-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:778-82.

14.

Mayer

Allan

Harkin

, et al. Angiographic coronary slow flow is not a valid surrogate for invasively diagnosed coronary microvascular dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;17:920-9.

15.

Zhang

Westra

, et al. Automatic coronary blood flow computation: validation in quantitative flow ratio from coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;35:587-95.

16.

Abaci

Oguzhan

Eryol

Ergin

Effect of potential confounding factors on the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial frame count and its reproducibility. Circulation. 1999;100:2219-23.

17.

Hodgson

Mancini

Legrand

Vogel

RA.

Characterisation of changes in coronary blood flow during the first six seconds after intracoronary contrast injection. Invest Radiol. 1985;20:246-52.

18.

Bassan

Ganz

Marcus

Swan

The effect of intracoronary injection of contrast medium upon coronary blood flow. Circulation. 1974;51:442-5.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.23 MB