Esophageal Motor Function in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux is Superior to That in Classic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Abstract

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in otolaryngology patients appears to be different from classic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In particular, esophagitis and its principal symptom, heartburn, considered the diagnostic sine qua non of GERD, are often absent in LPR. It has therefore been postulated that LPR patients have superior esophageal function. Esophageal acid clearance (EAC) is a measure of the ability of the esophagus to restore neutral pH after reflux events have occurred. It is considered an excellent overall measure of esophageal function. The mean EAC can be calculated from 24-hour pH monitoring data. A comparison of EAC in patients with GERD and LPR has not been previously reported. To compare the EAC of 1) patients with LPR alone, 2) patients with GERD alone, 3) patients with both LPR and GERD, and 4) patients without either LPR or GERD, we studied 200 otolaryngological patients who had undergone 24-hour double-probe (simultaneous pharyngeal and distal esophageal) pH monitoring, 50 in each group. The subgrouping of each patient was determined by previously established pH monitoring criteria. We defined GERD as abnormal esophageal reflux and LPR as abnormal pharyngeal reflux. The patients with GERD had a mean (±SD) EAC of 1.44 ± 1.2 minutes, and those with LPR had a mean EAC of 1.00 ± 1.00 minutes (p <.05). The patients with both GERD and LPR had a mean EAC of 1.53 ± 1.01 minutes. The patients without reflux had a mean EAC of 0.53 ± 0.38 minutes. We conclude that patients with LPR have significantly better EAC than those with GERD. These data suggest that patients with LPR have superior esophageal function. This finding may clarify our understanding of the differences in mechanisms, symptoms, and incidence of esophagitis in patients with LPR and GERD.

Keywords

esophageal acid clearance esophagus gastroesophageal reflux laryngopharyngeal reflux reflux

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Koufman

. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): A clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope 1991;101 (suppl 53).

Ossakow

Elta

Colturi

Bogdasarian

Nostrant

. Esophageal reflux and dysmotility as the basis for persistent cervical symptoms. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987;96:387–92.

Wiener

Koufman

Cooper

Richter

Castell

. Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: Documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 1989;84:1503–8.

Miller

DoVale

Gunther

. Utilization of inlying pH probe for evaluation of acid-peptic diathesis. Arch Surg 1964;89:199–203.

Spencer

. Prolonged pH recording in the study of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 1969;56:912–4.

Johnson

DeMeester

. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1974;62:325–32.

DeMeester

Johnson

. The evaluation of objective measurements of gastroesophageal reflux and their contribution to patient management. Surg Clin North Am 1976;56:39–53.

DeMeester

Johnson

Joseph

Toscano

Hall

Skinner

. Patterns of gastroesophageal reflux in health and disease. Ann Surg 1976;184:459–70.

Wiener

Cooper

. Is hoarseness an atypical manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux (GER)? An ambulatory 24-hour pH study [Abstract]. Gastroenterology 1986;90:1691.

10.

Helm

. Esophageal acid clearance. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986;8(suppl 1):5–11.

11.

Rosman

Goldberg

Federman

. Chronic xerostomia alters 23 hour esophageal pH and is associated with esophageal inflammation [Abstract]. Gastroenterology 1988:94:A387.

12.

Postma

. Ambulatory pH monitoring methodology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000;109(suppl 184):10–4.

13.

Richter

. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: Practical approach and clinical application. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 1997.

14.

Johnson

Koufman

Nowak

Belafsky

Postma

. Ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring: The importance of manometry. Laryngoscope (in press).

15.

Jamieson

Stein

DeMeester

. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: Normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:1102–11.

16.

Shaker

Milbrath

Ren

. Esophagopharyngeal distribution of refluxed gastric acid in patients with reflux laryngitis. Gastroenterology 1995;109:1575–82.