Rehabilitation of laryngectomees has been furthered by the introduction of heat and moisture exchange (HME) filters, placed over a tracheostoma or on a tracheostoma valve (TSV). The airflow resistance of HME filters is an important factor with regard to the comfort of the patient. The goal of this study was to determine the airflow resistance (defined as the pressure drop over the device divided by the squared airflow through the device) of 4 commercially available HME filters with and without a TSV. The pressure drop over and the airflow through the devices were measured in vitro. Distinct differences among the devices were found. The mean airflow resistance of the HME filters ranged from 135 to 346 Pa • s2/L2, that of TSVs was between 66 and 297 Pa • s2/L2, and that of the combination was between 263 and 454 Pa • s2/L2. The Stom-Vent 2 HME filter and the Adeva Window TSV with an Adeva filter had the lowest airflow resistance of the devices measured in this study.
SingerMIBlomED. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1980; 89: 529–33.
2.
MahieuHF. Laryngectomee voice rehabilitation using the Groningen button voice prosthesis. Rev Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Bord)1987; 108: 113–9.
3.
BlomEDHamakerRC. Tracheoesophageal voice restoration following total laryngectomy. In: MyersENSuenJ, eds. Cancers of the head and neck. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders, 1996: 839–52.
4.
HilgersFJCornelissenMWBalmAJM. Aerodynamic characteristics of the Provox low-resistance indwelling voice prosthesis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1993; 250: 375–8.
5.
van Lith-BijlJTMahieuHFPatelPZijlstraRJ. Clinical experience with the low-resistance Groningen button. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1992; 249: 354–7.
6.
BusscherHJGeertsema-DoornbuschGIvan der MeiHC. Adhesion to silicone rubber of yeasts and bacteria isolated from voice prostheses: Influence of salivary conditioning films. J Biomed Mater Res1997; 34: 201–9.
7.
GeertsemaAAde VriesMPSchutteHKLubbersJVerkerkeGJ. In vitro measurements of aerodynamic characteristics of an improved tracheostoma valve for laryngectomees. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1998; 255: 244–9.
8.
GeertsemaAABoonstraCWSchutteHKVerkerkeGJ. Design and test of a new tracheostoma valve based on inhalation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1999; 125: 622–6.
9.
GrolmanWSchouwenburgPFde BoerMFKnegtPPSpoelstraHAAMeeuwisCA. First results with the Blom-Singer adjustable tracheostoma valve. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec1995; 57: 165–70.
10.
HerrmannIFKossW. Experience with the ESKA-Herrmann tracheostoma valve. In: HerrmannIF, ed. Speech restoration via voice prostheses. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1986: 184–6.
11.
van den HoogenFJAMeeuwisCOudesMJJanssenPManniJJ. The Blom-Singer tracheostoma valve as a valuable addition in the rehabilitation of the laryngectomized patient. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1996; 253: 126–9.
12.
BalleVHRindsoLThomsenJ. Speech rehabilitation by Provox voice prosthesis combined with heat and moisture exchange filters. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)Suppl1997(suppl 529): 251–3.
13.
HilgersFJAaronsonNKAckerstaffAHSchouwenburgPFvan ZandwijkN. The influence of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) on the respiratory symptoms after total laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol1991; 16: 152–6.
14.
RoustanJPKienlenJAubasPAubasSdu CailarJ. Comparison of hydrophobic heat and moisture exchangers with heated humidifier during prolonged mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med1992; 18: 97–100.
15.
ThomaschotLViviandXArnaudSBoissonCMartinCD. Comparing two heat and moisture exchangers, one hydrophobic and one hygroscopic, on humidifying efficacy and the rate of nosocomial pneumonia. Chest1998; 114: 1383–9.
16.
VillafaneMCCinnellaGLofasoF. Gradual reduction of endotracheal tube diameter during mechanical ventilation via different humidification devices. Anesthesiology1996; 85: 1341–9.
17.
GrolmanWBlomEDBransonRDSchouwenburgPFHamakerRC. An efficiency comparison of four heat and moisture exchangers used in the laryngectomized patient. Laryngoscope1997; 107: 814–20.
18.
GrolmanWVan SteenwijkRPGrolmanESchouwenburgPF. Airflow and pressure characteristics of three different tracheostoma valves. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1998; 107: 312–8.
19.
VerkerkeGJVeenstraASchutteHKHerrmannIFRakhorstG. Design and test of a hands-free tracheostoma valve to improve the rehabilitation process after laryngectomy. Int J Artif Organs1994; 17: 175–82.
20.
van den HoogenFJAVeenstraAVerkerkeGJSchutteHKManniJJ. In vivo aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1997; 117: 897–902.
21.
VeenstraAvan den HoogenFJASchutteHKNijdamHFManniJJVerkerkeGJ. Aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis in relation to tracheo-esophageal wall thickness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1997; 254: 1–5.
22.
VerkerkeGJde VriesMPSchutteHKvan den HoogenFJRakhorstG. Analysis of the mechanical behavior of the Nijdam voice prosthesis. Laryngoscope1997; 107: 1656–60.
23.
WeinbergBMoonJ. Aerodynamic properties of four tracheoesophageal puncture prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol1984; 110: 673–5.
24.
ZijlstraRJMahieuHFvan Lith-BijlJTSchutteHK. Aerodynamic properties of the low-resistance Groningen button. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1991; 117: 657–61.
25.
ColePSavardPMiljeteigHHaightJSJ. Resistance to respiratory airflow of the extrapulmonary airways. Laryngoscope1993; 103: 447–50.
26.
FerrisBGMeadJOpieLH. Partitioning of respiratory flow resistance in man. J Appl Physiol1964; 19: 653–8.
27.
McRaeRDRJonesASYoungPHamiltonJ. Resistance, humidity and temperature of the tracheal airway. Clin Otolaryngol1995; 20: 355–6.
28.
SchiratzkiH. The oral and laryngeal components of the upper airway resistance during mouth breathing. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1965; 60: 71–82.
VerkerkeGJGeertsemaAASchutteHK. Airflow resistance of airflow-regulating devices described by independent coefficients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2001; 110: 639–45.
31.
Drake-LeeA. The physiology of the nose and paranasal sinuses. In: GleesonM, ed. Basic sciences; Scott-Brown's otolaryngology. Vol 1. Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997: 1/6/1–21.
