Comparison of Various Methods of Electromyographic Monitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve in Thyroid Surgery

Abstract

In the present study, 3 types of electrodes for recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) monitoring are compared: 1) intralaryngeal surface electrodes attached to a conventional endotracheal tube, 2) monopolar needle electrodes placed on the vocal cords by direct laryngoscopy, and 3) bipolar needle electrodes inserted intraoperatively through the cricothyroid ligament. Data were collected from stimulation of 21 RLNs in 16 patients undergoing thyroid surgery. The reliability in terms of distinct electromyographic (EMG) potentials following stimulation of the RLN was 100% with monopolar and bipolar needle electrodes and 76% with intralaryngeal surface electrodes. The mean (±SD) amplitudes of the EMG potentials were 1.61 ± 1.6 mV, 2.37 ± 1.8 mV, and 0.35 ± 0.4 mV for the monopolar endolaryngeal, bipolar transligament, and intralaryngeal surface electrodes, respectively. The advantages and disadvantages of each type of electrode are discussed.

Keywords

electromyogram of vocal muscle recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring thyroid surgery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lahey

. Exposure of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1938;66:775–7.

Mountain

Stewart

Colcock

. The recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1971; 133:978–80.

James

Crocker

Woltering

Ferrara

Farrar

. A simple method for identifying and testing the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1985;161:185–6.

Gavilán

. Recurrent laryngeal nerve: Identification during thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:1286–8.

Spahn

Bizal

Ferguson

Lingeman

. Identification of the motor laryngeal nerves — A new electrical stimulation technique. Laryngoscope 1981;91:1865–8.

Engel

Buter

Page

Mos

. A device for the location and protection of the recurrent laryngeal nerve during operations upon the neck. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981; 152:825–6.

Hvidegaard

Vase

Dalsgaard

Jorgensen

. Endo-laryngeal devices for perioperative identification and functional testing of the recurrent nerve. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984; 92:292–4.

Rea

. Postcricoid surface laryngeal electrode. Ear Nose Throat J 1992;71:267–9.

Eisele

. Intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope 1996; 106:443–9.

10.

Srinivasan

Premachandra

. Use of a disposable electrode for recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring. J Laryngol Otol 1998;112:561–4.

11.

Khan

Pearlman

Bianchi

Hauck

. Experience with Two types of electromyography monitoring electrodes during thyroid surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 1997;18:99–102.

12.

Flisberg

Lindholm

. Electrical stimulation of the human recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroid operation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1969(suppl 263):63–7.

13.

Neumann

. Intraoperatives neurophysiologisches Monitoring (IONM) des Nervus recurrens und Mikrodissektion. Operationstechnische Verfahren zur Risikominderung von Recurrensparesen. Laryngorhinootologie 2000;79:290–6.

14.

Tschopp

Probst

. Neue Aspekte in der Schilddrüsenchirurgie mit dem intraoperativen Monitoring des N. laryngeus recurrens. Laryngorhinootologie 1994;73:568–72.

15.

Davis

Rea

Templer

. Recurrent laryngeal nerve localization using a microlaryngeal electrode. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1979;87:330–3.

16.

Lipton

McCaffrey

Litchy

. Intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring of laryngeal muscle during thyroid surgery. Laryngoscope 1988;98:1292–6.

17.

Gericke

Müller

. Die Wertigkeit verschiedener Verfahren des Monitorings des Nervus recurrens bei Schilddrüsenoperationen. Akt Prob Otorhinolaryngol ORL 1997;21:244–9.

18.

Horn

Rötzscher

. Intraoperative electromyogram monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: Experience with an intralaryngeal surface electrode. A method to reduce the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroid surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1999;384:392–5.