Multiple Auditory Steady-State Responses in Children and Adults with Normal Hearing,Sensorineural Hearing Loss,or Auditory Neuropathy

Abstract

Objectives:

We tested the clinical effectiveness of multiple auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) for the objective assessment of hearing thresholds in patients with and without hearing loss, candidates for cochlear implants, and children with auditory neuropathy.

Methods:

The study sample included 29 subjects with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), 18 candidates for cochlear implants, 11 subjects with auditory neuropathy, and 18 subjects with normal hearing thresholds. Behavioral hearing thresholds and ASSRs to carrier frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz were obtained. Special care was taken to minimize possible aliasing and high-intensity multiple stimulation effects. Differences and correlations between the ASSRs and the behavioral thresholds were determined.

Results:

The ASSR estimation of behavioral thresholds in the normal-hearing group was elevated, whereas very close predictions were found for the SNHL group. The correlations between the Two measures ranged from 0.86 at 0.5 kHz carrier frequency to 0.94 at 2 kHz. In the cochlear implant candidates and the auditory neuropathy group, the ASSR thresholds generally overestimated the behavioral audiogram. In these groups the number of detected ASSRs was higher than the number of behavioral responses, especially for the high-frequency carrier stimuli.

Conclusions:

Multiple ASSRs may reliably predict the behavioral threshold in subjects with SNHL and may serve as a valuable objective measure for assessing the hearing threshold across different frequencies in candidates for cochlear implants and children with auditory neuropathy.

Keywords

adult audiogram auditory neuropathy auditory steady-state response child cochlear implant hearing loss

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Attias

Furst

Fuzman

Reshef

Horowitz

Bresloff

. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995;16:612–8.

Cone-Wesson

Dowell

Tomlin

Rance

Ming

. The auditory steady-state response: Comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:173–87, 225–6.

Gorga

Kaminski

Beauchaine

Jesteadt

. Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects. J Speech Hear Res 1988;31:87–97.

Laukli

Fjermedal

Mair

. Low-frequency auditory brainstem response threshold. Scand Audiol 1988;17:171–8.

Rickards

Tan

Cohen

Wilson

Drew

Clark

. Auditory steady-state evoked potential in newborns. Br J Audiol 1994;28:327–37.

Kuwada

Batra

Maher

. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res 1986;21:179–92.

Cohen

Rickards

Clark

. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;90:2467–79.

Aoyagi

Kiren

Furuse

. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1994(suppl 511):7–14.

Levi

Folsom

Dobie

. Coherence analysis of envelope-following responses (EFRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) in infants and adults. Hear Res 1995;89:21–7.

10.

Lins

Picton

. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;96:420–32.

11.

Kuwada

Anderson

Batra

Fitzpatrick

Teissier

D'Angelo

. Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:188–204.

12.

Cone-Wesson

Rickards

Poulis

Parker

Tan

Pollard

. The auditory steady-state response: Clinical observations and applications in infants and children. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:270–82.

13.

Rance

Rickards

. Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:236–45.

14.

Vander Werff

Brown

Gienapp

Clay

KM Schmidt

. Comparison of auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:227–35, 283–4.

15.

Dimitrijevic

John

Van Roon

. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:205–24.

16.

John

Lins

Boucher

Picton

. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 1998;37:59–82.

17.

John

Picton

. MASTER: A Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2000;61:125–50.

18.

Rance

Briggs

. Assessment of hearing in infants with moderate to profound impairment: The Melbourne experience with auditory steady-state evoked potential testing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002;111(suppl 189):22–8.

19.

Small

Stapells

. Artifactual responses when recording auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear 2004;25:611–23.

20.

Picton

John

. Avoiding electromagnetic artifacts when recording auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2004;15:541–54.

21.

Picton

Dimitrijevic

Perez-Abalo

Van Roon

. Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:140–56.

22.

Picton

John

Dimitrijevic

Purcell

. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 2003;42:177–219.

23.

John

Purcell

Dimitrijevic

Picton

. Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:246–59.

24.

Gorga

Neely

Hoover

Dierking

Beauchaine

Manning

. Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements. Ear Hear 2004;25:302–7.

25.

Starr

Picton

Sininger

Hood

Berlin

. Auditory neuropathy. Brain 1996;119:741–53.

26.

Carhart

Jerger

. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Res 1959;24:330–45.

27.

Picton

Durieux-Smith

Champagne

. Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 1998;9:315–31.

28.

John

Dimitrijevic

Picton

. Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear Hear 2002;23:106–17.

29.

John

Dimitrijevic

van Roon

Picton

. Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiol Neurootol 2001;6:12–27.

30.

Wilber

Kruger

Killion

. Reference thresholds for the ER-3A insert earphone. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83:669–76.

31.

Lins

Picton

Boucher

. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996;17:81–96.

32.

Perez-Abalo

Savio

Torres

Martin

Rodriguez

Galan

. Steady-state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear 2001;22:200–11.

33.

Hsu

Liu

. Objective assessment of auditory thresholds in noise-induced hearing loss using steady-state evoked potentials. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003;28:195–8.

34.

Colebatch

. Vestibular evoked potentials. Curr Opin Neurol 2001;14:21–6.

35.

Nong

Ura

Owa

Noda

. An acoustically evoked short latency negative response in profound hearing loss patients. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2000;120:960–6.

36.

Townsend

Cody

. The averaged inion response evoked by acoustic stimulation: Its relation to the saccule. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1971;80:121–31.

37.

Swanepoel

Hugo

Roode

. Auditory steady-state responses for children with severe to profound hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:531–5.