Endoscopy of the human olfactory cleft is important for both research in human olfaction and clinical examination with regard to olfactory disorders. However, endoscopy only provides information on the morphology and functional status of the epithelium, and it does not allow discrimination between respiratory and olfactory mucosa. To obtain information on the functional status of the olfactory mucosa, I used endoscopy to investigate the optical intrinsic signal recording from the human olfactory cleft.
Methods:
A light-emitting diode (617 nm) light source and a cooled charge-coupled device camera were prepared for endoscopy of the olfactory cleft. Subjects were exposed to various odors presented in front of their nostrils. In addition, blanks were used for control.
Results:
When normosmic subjects sniffed the odors, the intensity of the signal from the olfactory mucosa changed, which was not the case when blank stimuli were presented. Different odors activated different response patterns. A decrease of the oxyhemoglobin level in the activated olfactory epithelium is suspected to be responsible for this observation.
Conclusions:
The optical intrinsic signals were recorded from the human olfactory cleft with an endoscope. This technique may be applicable to basic research in olfaction and to a clinical test for the assessment of olfactory disorders.
HummelTKnechtMKobalG. Peripherally obtained electrophysiological responses to olfactory stimulation in man: Electro-olfactograms exhibit a smaller degree of desensitization compared with subjective intensity estimates. Brain Res1996;717:160–4.
2.
KnechtMHummelT. Recording of the human electro-olfactogram. Physiol Behav2004;83:13–9.
3.
LeopoldDAHummelTSchwobJEHongSCKnechtMKobalG. Anterior distribution of human olfactory epithelium. Laryngoscope2000;110:417–21.
4.
SchafferPAhammerHMullerWKoidlBWindischH. Di-4-ANEPPS causes photodynamic damage to isolated cardio-myocytes. Pflugers Arch1994;426:548–51.
5.
GrinvaldALiekeEFrostigRDGilbertCDWieselTN. Functional architecture of cortex revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Nature1986;324:361–4.
6.
GochinPMBedenbaughPGelfandJJGrossCGGersteinGL. Intrinsic signal optical imaging in the forepaw area of rat somatosensory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1992;89:8381–3.
7.
MasinoSAKwonMCDoryYFrostigRD. Characterization of functional organization within rat barrel cortex using intrinsic signal optical imaging through a thinned skull. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1993;90:9998–10002.
8.
MalonekDDirnaglULindauerUYamadaKKannoIGrinvaldA. Vascular imprints of neuronal activity: Relationships between the dynamics of cortical blood flow, oxygenation, and volume changes following sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1997;94:14826–31.
9.
RubinBDKatzLC. Optical imaging of odorant representations in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Neuron1999;23:499–511.
10.
TanakaTYazawaISatoKMomose-SatoYKaminoK. Consistency behind trial-to-trial variation in intrinsic optical responses to single-whisker movement in the rat D1-barrel cortex. Neurosci Res2000;36:193–207.
11.
UchidaNTakahashiYKTanifujiMMoriK. Odor maps in the mammalian olfactory bulb: Domain organization and odorant structural features. Nat Neurosci2000;3:1035–43.
12.
MeisterMBonhoefferT. Tuning and topography in an odor map on the rat olfactory bulb. J Neurosci2001;21:1351–60.
13.
SasakiSYazawaIMiyakawaN. Optical imaging of intrinsic signals induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in the in vivo rat spinal cord. Neuroimage2002;17:1240–55. [Erratum in Neuroimage 2003;18:1010.]
14.
YuanQHarleyCWMcLeanJHKnopfelT. Optical imaging of odor preference memory in the rat olfactory bulb. J Neurophysiol2002;87:3156–9.
15.
SasakiSSatoKShinomiyaKMomose-SatoY. Postnatal changes in intrinsic optical responses to peripheral nerve stimulation in the in vivo rat spinal cord. Neuroimage2003;20:2126–34.
16.
WachowiakMCohenLB. Correspondence between odorant-evoked patterns of receptor neuron input and intrinsic optical signals in the mouse olfactory bulb. J Neurophysiol2003;89:1623–9.
17.
SugaiTMiyazawaTFukudaMYoshimuraHOnodaN. Odor-concentration coding in the guinea-pig piriform cortex. Neuroscience2005;130:769–81.
18.
HaglundMMOjemannGAHochmanDW. Optical imaging of epileptiform and functional activity in human cerebral cortex. Nature1992;358:668–71.
19.
TogaAWCannestraAFBlackKL. The temporal/spatial evolution of optical signals in human cortex. Cereb Cortex1995;5:561–5.
20.
CannestraAFBlackKLMartinNA. Topographical and temporal specificity of human intraoperative optical intrinsic signals. Neuroreport1998;9:2557–63.
21.
PouratianNBookheimerSYO'FarrellAM. Optical imaging of bilingual cortical representations. Case report. J Neurosurg2000;93:676–81.
22.
ShohamDGrinvaldA. The cortical representation of the hand in macaque and human area S-I: High resolution optical imaging. J Neurosci2001;21:6820–35.
23.
SatoKNariaiTSasakiS. Intraoperative intrinsic optical imaging of neuronal activity from subdivisions of the human primary somatosensory cortex. Cereb Cortex2002;12:269–80.
24.
SatoKNariaiTTanakaY. Functional representation of the finger and face in the human somatosensory cortex: Intraoperative intrinsic optical imaging. Neuroimage2005;25:1292–301.
25.
KobalGHummelTSekingerBBarzSRoscherSWolfS. “Sniffin' Sticks”: Screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology1996;34:222–6.
26.
HummelTKonnerthCGRosenheimKKobalG. Screening of olfactory function with a four-minute odor identification test: Reliability, normative data, and investigations in patients with olfactory loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2001;110:976–81.
27.
IharaYIshimaruTIshikawaM. Utility of the Sniffin' Sticks level 1 test in Japanese [in Japanese]. Jpn J Taste Smell Res2005;12:519–22.
28.
ShethSANemotoMGuiouMWalkerMPouratianNTogaAW. Linear and nonlinear relationships between neuronal activity, oxygen metabolism, and hemodynamic responses. Neuron2004;42:347–55.
29.
DotyRLBruggerWEJursPCOrndorffMASnyderPJLowryLD. Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: Psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol Behav1978;20:175–85.
30.
HamadaTYamaguchM. Evoked and oscillatory neuromagnetic responses to sniffing odor in human subjects. Behav Brain Res2001;123:219–23.
31.
MoriKTakahashiYKIgarashiKMYamaguchiM. Maps of odorant molecular features in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Physiol Rev2006;86:409–33.
32.
KentPFMozellMM. The recording of odorant-induced mucosal activity patterns with a voltage-sensitive dye. J Neurophysiol1992;68:1804–19.
33.
YoungentobSLKentPFSheehePRSchwobJETzoumakaE. Mucosal inherent activity patterns in the rat: Evidence from voltage-sensitive dyes. J Neurophysiol1995;73:387–98.
34.
KentPFMozellMMYoungentobSLYurcoP. Mucosal activity patterns as a basis for olfactory discrimination: Comparing behavior and optical recordings. Brain Res2003;981:1–11.
