Acoustic Correlate of Vocal Effort in Spasmodic Dysphonia

Abstract

Objectives:

This study characterized the relationship between relative fundamental frequency (RFF) and listeners' perceptions of vocal effort and overall spasmodic dysphonia severity in the voices of 19 individuals with adductor spasmodic dysphonia.

Methods:

Twenty inexperienced listeners evaluated the vocal effort and overall severity of voices using visual analog scales. The squared correlation coefficients (R²) between average vocal effort and overall severity and RFF measures were calculated as a function of the number of acoustic instances used for the RFF estimate (from 1 to 9, of a total of 9 voiced-voiceless-voiced instances).

Results:

Increases in the number of acoustic instances used for the RFF average led to increases in the variance predicted by the RFF at the first cycle of voicing onset (onset RFF) in the perceptual measures; the use of 6 or more instances resulted in a stable estimate. The variance predicted by the onset RFF for vocal effort (R² range, 0.06 to 0.43) was higher than that for overall severity (R² range, 0.06 to 0.35). The offset RFF was not related to the perceptual measures, irrespective of the sample size.

Conclusions:

This study indicates that onset RFF measures are related to perceived vocal effort in patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia. These results have implications for measuring outcomes in this population.

Keywords

acoustic measure fundamental frequency vocal effort voice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Verdolini

Rosen

Branski

, eds. Classification manual for voice disorders — I. 1st ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006.

Nash

Ludlow

, Laryngeal muscle activity during speech breaks in adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Laryngoscope 1996;106:484–9.

Sapienza

Walton

Murry

Acoustic variations in adductor spasmodic dysphonia as a function of speech task. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999;42:127–40.

Ludlow

, Treatment for spasmodic dysphonia: Limitations of current approaches. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;17:160–5.

Izdebski

Symptomatology of adductor spasmodic dysphonia: A physiologic model. J Voice 1992;6:306–19.

Stewart

Allen

Tureen

Diamond

Blitzer

Brin

, Adductor spasmodic dysphonia: Standard evaluation of symptoms and severity. J Voice 1997;11:95–103.

Langeveld

Drost

Frijns

Zwinderman

de Jong

RJ Baatenburg

. Perceptual characteristics of adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:741–8.

Zwirner

Murry

Woodson

, Perceptual-acoustic relationships in spasmodic dysphonia. J Voice 1993;7:165–71.

Stepp

Hillman

Heaton

, The impact of vocal hyperfunction on relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2010;53:1220–6.

10.

Stepp

Merchant

Heaton

Hillman

, Effects of voice therapy on relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset in patients with vocal hyperfunction. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2011;54:1260–6.

11.

Goberman

Blomgren

Fundamental frequency change during offset and onset of voicing in individuals with Parkinson disease. J Voice 2008;22:178–91.

12.

Houtz

Roy

Merrill

Smith

, Differential diagnosis of muscle tension dysphonia and adductor spasmodic dysphonia using spectral moments of the long-term average spectrum. Laryngoscope 2010;120:749–57.

13.

Ohde

, Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. J Acoust Soc Am 1984;75:224–30.

14.

Watson

, Fundamental frequency during phonetically governed devoicing in normal young and aged speakers. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:3642–7.

15.

Robb

Smith

, Fundamental frequency onset and offset behavior: A comparative study of children and adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002;45:446–56.

16.

Erickson

, Effects of voicing and syntactic complexity on sign expression in adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2003;12:416–24.

17.

Eadie

Nicolici

Baylor

Almand

Waugh

Maronian

Effect of experience on judgments of adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007;116:695–701.

18.

Fairbanks

Voice and articulation drillbook. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1960.

19.

Dedo

Shipp

Spastic dysphonia: A surgical and voice therapy treatment program. Houston, Tex: College Hill Press, 1980.

20.

Roy

Gouse

Mauszycki

Merrill

Smith

, Task specificity in adductor spasmodic dysphonia versus muscle tension dysphonia. Laryngoscope 2005;115:311–6.

21.

Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 5.0.20, 2008: http://www.praat.org/. Accessed April 3, 2012.

22.

Eadie

Doyle

, Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;112:3014–21.

23.

Verdolini

Titze

Fennell

Dependence of phonatory effort on hydration level. J Speech Hear Res 1994;37:1001–7.

24.

Kempster

Gerratt

Abbott

K Verdolini

Barkmeier-Kraemer

Hillman

, Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2009;18:124–32.

25.

Roy

Functional dysphonia. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;11:144–8.

26.

Stepp

Sawin

Eadie

, The relationship between perception of vocal effort and relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2012;55:1887–96.