To determine if suprafascial harvest of the radial forearm free flap improves postoperative donor site outcomes compared to subfascial harvest.
Methods:
Retrospective chart review.
Results:
Forty-six patients underwent reconstruction of a head and neck defect with a radial forearm free flap (RFFF). Subfascial harvest of the RFFF was performed in 25 (53%) patients and suprafascial harvest performed in 22 (47%) patients. All donor sites were covered with a split thickness skin graft and a bolster that remained in place for 6 days. Postoperative tendon exposure at the donor site occurred in 5 (20%) of the patients in the subfascial group and in 0 (0%) of the patients in the suprafascial group (P = .05; Fisher’s exact test). Average tourniquet time was 117 minutes in the subfascial group and 102 minutes in the suprafascial group. Hematoma formation occurred at the donor site in 2 (8%) and 1 (5%) patients in the subfascial and suprafascial groups, respectively. There were no complete or partial flap losses in either group.
Conclusions:
Suprafascial harvest of the RFFF decreases the risk of postoperative tendon exposure. The suprafascial harvest technique does not increase harvest time or donor site complications, nor does it negatively impact flap vascularity.
AndrewsBTSmithRBChangKEScharpfJGoldsteinDPFunkGF. Management of the radial forearm free flap donor site with the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(10):1918-1922.
4.
BardsleyAFSoutarDSElliotDBatchelorAG. Reducing morbidity in the radial forearm flap donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(2):287-292.
5.
BoormanJGBrownJASykesPJ. Morbidity in the forearm flap donor arm. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40(2):207-212.
6.
BootzFBiesingerE. Reduction of complication rate at radial forearm flap donor sites. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1991;53(3):160-164.
7.
BrownMTCheneyMLGliklichRLShefflerLRVarvaresMA. Assessment of functional morbidity in the radial forearm free flap donor site. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(9):991-994.
8.
de BreeRHartleyCSmeeleLEKuikDJQuakJJLeemansCR. Evaluation of donor site function and morbidity of the fasciocutaneous radial forearm flap. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(11):1973-1976.
9.
Hulsbergen-KrugerSMullerKParteckeBD. [Donor site defect after removal of free and pedicled forearm flaps: functional and cosmetic results]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1996;28(2):70-75.
10.
RichardsonDFisherSEVaughanEDBrownJS. Radial forearm flap donor-site complications and morbidity: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(1):109-115.
11.
SardesaiMGFungKYooJHBakkerH. Donor-site morbidity following radial forearm free tissue transfer in head and neck surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;37(3):411-416.
12.
SwansonEBoydJBManktelowRT. The radial forearm flap: Reconstructive applications and donor-site defects in 35 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85(2):258-266.
BashirMAFungVKernohanMDRagbirMAhmedOA. “Z-plasty” modification of ulnar-based fasciocutaneous flap for closure of the radial forearm flap donor defect. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(1):22-23.
15.
ChangKPLaiCHLiangWLLaiCSLinSD. Alternative reconstruction of donor defect of free radial forearm flap in head and neck cancer. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2010;44(1):31-36.
16.
ChioEGAgrawalA. A randomized, prospective, controlled study of forearm donor site healing when using a vacuum dressing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142(2):174-178.
17.
Gonzalez-GarciaRRuiz-LazaLManzanoDMonjeF. Combined local triangular full-thickness skin graft for the closure of the radial forearm free flap donor site: a new technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(2):85e-86e.
18.
GravvanisAITsoutsosDAIconomouTGremoutisG. The use of integra artificial dermis to minimize donor-site morbidity after suprafascial dissection of the radial forearm flap. Microsurgery. 2007;27(7):583-587.
19.
GuptaMAllenMCorstenM. Reduction of donor site morbidity in the radial forearm free flap by use of topical tissue expanders. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;38(6):628-631.
20.
HoTCouchMCarsonKSchimbergAManleyKByrnePJ. Radial forearm free flap donor site outcomes comparison by closure methods. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134(2):309-315.
21.
KajikawaAUedaKKatsuragiY. Split-thickness skin flap technique for elevating the radial forearm flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(1):284-287.
22.
KarimiAMahyPReychlerH. Closure of radial forearm free flap donor site defect with a local meshed full-thickness skin graft: a retrospective study of an original technique. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007;35(8):369-373.
23.
KimTBMoeKSEiseleDWOrloffLAWangSJ. Full-thickness skin graft from the groin for coverage of the radial forearm free flap donor site. Am J Otolaryngol. 2007;28(5):325-329.
24.
LeeJWJangYCOhSJ. Use of the artificial dermis for free radial forearm flap donor site. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(5):500-502.
25.
MakkarSSSharmaRKParasharA. Split-thickness skin flap technique for elevating the radial forearm flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(3):1007-1008.
26.
MotomuraHOhbaNOhashiN. Improvement of the radial forearm donor site by compression with hydrocolloid dressing and adhesive sponge. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 2006;126(2):204-208.
27.
VidrineDMKalerSRosenthalEL. A comparison of negative-pressure dressings versus bolster and splinting of the radial forearm donor site. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;133(3):403-406.
28.
ZuidamJMCoertJHHoferSO. Closure of the donor site of the free radial forearm flap: a comparison of full-thickness graft and split-thickness skin graft. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(6):612-616.
29.
WebsterHR RD. The radial forearm flap without fascia and other refinements. Eur J Plast Surg. 1995;18:11-13.
30.
ChangSCMillerGHalbertCFYangKHChaoWCWeiFC. Limiting donor site morbidity by suprafascial dissection of the radial forearm flap. Microsurgery. 1996;17(3):136-140.
31.
SchaverienMSaint-CyrM. Suprafascial compared with subfascial harvest of the radial forearm flap: an anatomic study. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2008;33(1):97-101.
32.
KamalDFassioEGoudotPYachouhJ. [Suprafascial dissection of the radial forearm flap]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2010;55(1):14-18.
33.
LutzBSWeiFCChangSCYangKHChenIH. Donor site morbidity after suprafascial elevation of the radial forearm flap: a prospective study in 95 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(1):132-137.
34.
WongCHLinJYWeiFC. The bottom-up approach to the suprafascial harvest of the radial forearm flap. Am J Surg. 2008;196(5):e60-e4.
35.
ChauJHarrisJNesbittPAllenHGuillemaudJSeikalyH. Radial forearm donor site: comparison of the functional and cosmetic outcomes of different reconstructive methods. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;38(2):294-301.
36.
ElliotDBardsleyAFBatchelorAGSoutarDS. Direct closure of the radial forearm flap donor defect. Br J Plast Surg. 1988;41(4):358-360.
37.
SinhaUKShihCChangKRiceDH. Use of AlloDerm for coverage of radial forearm free flap donor site. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(2):230-234.
38.
WaxMKWinslowCPAndersenPE. Use of allogenic dermis for radial forearm free flap donor site coverage. J Otolaryngol. 2002;31(6):341-345.
39.
EmerickKSDeschlerDG. Incidence of donor site skin graft loss requiring surgical intervention with the radial forearm free flap. Head Neck. 2007;29(6):573-576.
