The test-retest stability of the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire was assessed for a sample of 32 tinnitus patients. The questionnaire is a self-report measure that quantifies the physical, emotional, and social consequences of tinnitus (factor 1), the interfering effects of tinnitus on the hearing ability of the patient (factor 2), and the patients' view of tinnitus (factor 3). Retest stability estimates were obtained in order to determine the applicability of using the questionnaire as an outcome measure following tinnitus management. High test-retest correlations emerged for factors 1 and 2, whereas factor 3 yielded inadequate retest reliability. Therefore, it is recommended that only factors 1 and 2 be used for documenting changes in self-perceived tinnitus handicap following medical, surgical, or rehabilitative intervention.
McFaddenD. Tinnitus facts, theories and treatments. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1982.
2.
National Center for Health Statistics. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, United States, 1987. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 10, No. 166. DHHS publication No. (PHS) 33–1594. Public Health Service. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1987.
3.
BrownSC. Older Americans and tinnitus: a demographic study and chartbook, Gallaudet Research Institute. GRI Monograph Series A.No. 2. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, 1990.
4.
EmmettJRSheaJJ. Treatment of tinnitus with tocainide hydrochloride. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1980;88:442–6.
5.
HulshofJHVermeijP. The value of tocainide in the treatment of tinnitus: a double-blind controlled study. Arch Otorhinolaryngol1985;283:279–83.
6.
JohnsonRMBrummettRSchleuningA. Use of alpraxolam for relief of tinnitus. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1993;119:842–5.
7.
MeldingPSGoodeyRJThornePR. The use of intravenous lignocaine in the diagnosis and treatment of tinnitus. J Laryngol Otol1978;92:115–21.
8.
MøllerMBMøllerARJannettaPJJhoHD. Vascular decompression surgery for severe tinnitus: selection criteria and results. Laryngoscope1993;103:421–7.
9.
PulecJL. Tinnitus: surgical therapy. Am J Otol1984;5:479–80.
10.
SouliereCRKilenyPRZwolanTAKeminkJL. Tinnitus suppression following cochlear implantation: a multifactorial investigation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1992;118:1291–7.
11.
RoeserRJPriceDR. Clinical experience with tinnitus maskers. Ear Hear1980;1:63–8.
12.
StoufferJLTylerRSKilenyPRDalzellLE. Tinnitus as a function of duration and etiology: counselling implications. Am J Otol1991;12:189–94.
13.
SweetowRW. Cognitive aspects of tinnitus patient management. Ear Hear1986;7:390–6.
14.
VernonJASchleuningAT. Tinnitus: a new management. Laryngoscope1978;88:413–9.
15.
McCarthyP. Clinical observations of self-report and global measures of hearing aid benefit. In: StudebakerGBessFBeckL, eds. The Vanderbilt hearing-aid report II. Parkton, Md: York Press, 1991:215–9.
16.
AbramsHBHnath-ChisolmTGuerreiroSMRittermanS. The effects of intervention strategy on self-perception of hearing handicap. Ear Hear1992;13:371–7.
17.
HallamRSJakesSCHinchcliffeR. Cognitive variables in tinnitus annoyance. Br J Clin Psychol1988;27:213–22.
18.
SweetowRWLevyMC. Tinnitus severity scaling for diagnostic/therapeutic usage. Hear Instruments1990;41:20–1.
19.
WilsonPHenryJBowenMHaralambousG. Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire: psychometric properties of a measure of distress. J Speech Hear Res1991;34:197–201.
20.
HalfordJAndersonS. Tinnitus severity measured by a subjective scale, audiometry and clinical judgement. J Laryngol Otol1991;105:89–93.
21.
ErlandssonSEHallbergLRMAxelssonA. Psychological and audiological correlates of perceived tinnitus severity. Audiology1992;31:168–79.
22.
TylerRS. Tinnitus disability and handicap questionnaires. Semin Hear1993;14:377–84.
23.
DemorestMEErdmanSA. Research in audiological rehabilitation: the challenges. J Acad Rehabil Audiol1994;27 (suppl):291–316.
24.
KukFKTylerRSRussellDJordanH. The psychometric properties of a tinnitus handicap questionnaire. Ear Hear1990;11:434–45.
25.
DobieRASullivanMDKatonWJSakaiCSRussoJ. Antidepressant treatment of tinnitus patients. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1992;112:242–7.
26.
AltmanDGBlandJM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician1983;32:307–17.
27.
BlandJMAltmanDG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet1986;February:307–10.
28.
Precision of test methods I: guide for the determination and reproducibility for a standard test method (BS 5497, part 1). London, England: British Standards Institution, 1981.
29.
DemorestMEWaldenBE. Psychometric principles in the selection, interpretation, and evaluation of communication self-assessment inventories. J Speech Hear Disord1984;49:226–40.
30.
NunnallyJC. Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 1978.
31.
LangemarkMLoldrupDBechPOlesenJ. Clomipramine and mianserin in the treatment of chronic tension headache. A double-blind controlled study. Headache1990;30:118–21.
