The impact of altering laser focusing conditions on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy experiments is investigated under ambient Earth laboratory and simulated Martian atmospheres. Experiments were performed in which the focal spot size was varied on a sample by altering the lens to sample distance with respect to targets of interest. Samples investigated include aluminum, copper, and steel. Specific neutral and ionic transitions of each sample were monitored. Atomic and ionic emissions show different intensity peak distributions along the varying lens to sample distance. Ionic species have peak emissions when laser plasma is initiated with a focused spot within the sample in ambient Earth laboratory air, while atomic emissions have peak intensities several millimeters deeper into a sample. In simulated Martian atmospheres, atomic emissions are observed to peak when the laser is focused within the sample, while ionic emissions have peak intensities when the laser is focused near the surface of a sample.
CremersD.A.RadziemskiL.J.Handbook of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy., Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, 2006.
2.
WalR.L.V.TicichT.M.WestJ.R.HouseholderP.A.“Trace Metal Detection by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. Appl. Spectrosc. 1999. 53(10): 1226–1236.
3.
WainnerR.HarmonR.MiziolekA.McNesbyK.FrenchP.“Analysis of Environmental Lead Contamination: Comparison of LIBS Field and Laboratory Instruments”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2001. 56(6): 777–793.
4.
MarkushinY.MarcanoA.RockS.MelikechiN.“Determination of Protein Hydrogen Composition by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2010. 25(2): 148–149.
5.
KnightA.ScherbathN.CremersD.A.FerrisM.J.“Characterization of Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) for Application to Space Exploration”. Appl. Spectrosc. 2000. 54(3): 331–340.
6.
ShuR.QiH.LuG.MaD., et al.“Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Based Detection of Lunar Soil Simulants for Moon Exploration”. Chinese Opt. Lett. 2007. 5(1): 58–59.
7.
WiensR.C.MauriceS.“Chemcam’s Cost a Drop in the Mars Bucket”. Science. 2008. 322(5907): 1464.
8.
WebsterC.R.MahaffyP.R.AtreyaS.K.FleschG.J., et al.“Mars Methane Detection and Variability at Gale Crater”. Science. 2015. 347(6220): 415–417.
9.
PerezR.PeresL.NewellR.RobinsonS., et al.“The SuperCam Instrument on the NASA Mars 2020 Mission–Optical Design and Performance”. Proc. SPIE. 2016. 10562: K1–K9.
10.
R.C. Wiens, S. Maurice, M. McCabe, P. Cais, et al. “The SuperCam Remote Sensing Instrument Suite for Mars 2020”. 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. The Woodlands, Texas; 21–25 March 2016. https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2016/pdf/1322.pdf [accessed Sept 04 2020].
11.
X. Ren, T.N. Cai, D.W. Liu, J.J. Liu, et al. “Preliminary Scientific Exploration Programs for Mars Surface Composition Detection Package of China's First Mars Exploration”. 12th European Planetary Science Congress. Berlin, Germany: September 16–21, 2018. Pp.759–762.
12.
EpplerA.S.CremersD.A.HickmottD.D.FerrisM.J.KoskeloA.C.“Matrix Effects in the Detection of Pb and Ba in Soils Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. Appl. Spectrosc. 1996. 50(9): 1175–1181.
13.
ChaleardC.MachienP.AndreN.UebbingJ., et al.“Correction of Matrix Effects in Quantitative Elemental Analysis with Laser Ablation Optical Emission Spectrometry”. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrosc. 1997. 12(2): 183–188.
14.
CristoforettiG.GiacomoA.D.Dell’AglioM.LegnaioliS., et al.“Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: Beyond the McWhirter Criterion”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2010. 65(1): 86–95.
15.
TognoniE.CristoforettiG.LegnaioliS.PalleschiV.“Calibration-Free Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: State of the Art”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2010. 65(1): 1–14.
16.
SirvenJ.B.BousquetB.CanioniL.SargerL.“Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy of Composite Samples: Comparison of Advanced Chemometrics Methods”. Anal. Chem. 2006. 78(5): 1462–1469.
17.
CleggS.M.SkulteE.DyarM.D.BarefieldJ.E.WiensR.C.“Multivariate Analysis of Remote Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Spectra Using Partial Least Squares, Principal Component Analysis, and Related Techniques”. Spectrochim Acta, Part B. 2009. 64(1): 79–88.
18.
TuckerJ.M.DyarM.D.SchaeferM.W.CleggS.M.WiensR.C.“Optimization of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for Rapid Geochemical Analysis”. Chem. Geol. 2010. 277(1–2): 137–148.
19.
DyarM.D.TuckerJ.M.HumphriesS.CleggS.M., et al.“Strategies for Mars Remote Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Analysis of Sulfur in Geological Samples”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2011. 66(1): 39–56.
20.
DyarM.D.CarmosinoM.L.TuckerJ.M.BrownE.A., et al.“Remote Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Analysis of East African Rift Sedimentary Samples Under Mars Conditions”. Chem. Geol. 2012. 294–295: 135–151.
21.
AndersonR.B.MorrisR.V.CleggS.M.BellJ.F., et al.“The Influence of Multivariate Analysis Methods and Target Grain Size on the Accuracy of Remote Quantitative Chemical Analysis of Rocks Using Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. Icarus. 2011. 215(2): 608–627.
22.
HwangZ.W.TengY.Y.LiK.P.SneddonJ.“Interaction of Laser Beam with Metals. Part I: Quantitative Studies of Plasma Emission”. Appl. Spectrosc. 1991. 45(3): 435–441.
23.
SdorraW.BrustJ.NeimaxK.“Basic Investigations for Laser Microanalysis: IV. The Dependence on the Laser Wavelength in Laser Ablation”. Microchim. Acta. 1992. 108(1–2): 1–10.
24.
EhP.DeO.“Atmospheric Influences on Q-Switched Laser Sampling and Resulting Plumes”. Appl. Spectrosc. 1971. 25(6): 642–652.
25.
OwensM.MajidiV.“Effects of High-Pressure Buffer Gases on Emission From Laser-Induced Plasmas”. Appl. Spectrosc. 1991. 45(9): 1463–1467.
26.
KagawaK.OhtaniM.YokoiS.NakajimaS.“Characteristics of the Plasma Induced by Bombardment of N2 Laser Pulse at Low Pressures”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 1984. 39(4): 525–536.
27.
SdorraW.NeimaxK.“Basic Investigations for Laser Microanalysis: III. Application of Different Buffer Gases for Laser-Produced Sample Plumes”. Microchim. Acta. 1992. 107(3–6): 319–327.
28.
KasperczukA.PisarczykT.BadziakJ.MiklaszewskiR., et al.“Influence of the Focal Point Position of a Focusing Lens on a Character of an Ablative Plasma Expansion”. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2008. 112(2): 022047.
29.
De CarhalhoG.G.A.SantosD.NunesL.C.GomesM.D.S., et al.“Effects of Laser Focusing and Influence on Analysis of Pellets of Plant Materials by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2012. 74–75: 162–168.
30.
Diego-VallejoD.AshkensaiD.EichlerH.J.“Monitoring of Focus Position During Laser Processing Based on Plasma Emission”. Phys. Procedia. 2013. 41: 911–918.
31.
GondalM.A.HussainT.YamaniZ.H.“Optimization of the LIBS Parameters for Detection of Trace Metals in Petroleum Products”. Energy Sources, Part A. 2008. 30(5): 441–451.
32.
MultariR.A.FosterL.E.CremersD.A.FerrisM.J.“Effect of Sampling Geometry on Elemental Emissions in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. Appl. Spectrosc. 1996. 50(12): 1483–1499.
33.
MelikechiN.MezzacappaA.CousinA.LanzaN.L., et al.“Correcting for Variable Laser-Target Distances of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Measurements with ChemCam Using Emission Lines of Martian Dust Spectra”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2014. 96: 51–60.
34.
MezzacappaA.MelikechiN.CousinA.WiensR.C., et al.“Application of Distance Correction to ChemCam Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Measurements”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2016. 120: 19–29.
35.
A. Pontoni. Evolution of the Signal Induced by ChemCam on Mars as a Function of Focus. [Masters of Science Thesis]. Luleå, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology, 2018.
36.
SivakumarP.TalehL.MelikechiN.“Packing Density Effects on the Fluctuations of the Emission Lines in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2014. 92: 84–89.
37.
L. Taleh. Effects of Sample Properties and Spatial Characteristics of the Laser Beam on Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Emission Lines. [Doctor of Philosophy Thesis]. Dover, Delaware: Delaware State University, 2016.
38.
A. Kramida, Y. Ralchenko, J. Reader. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Atomic Spectra Database (v.5.7). http://physics.nist.gov/asd 2017 [accessed May 10, 2020].
39.
EffenbergerA.J.ScottJ.R.“Effect of Atmospheric Conditions on LIBS Spectra”. Sensors. 2010. 10(5): 4907–4925.
40.
KunzeH.J.“Introduction to Plasma Spectroscopy”., Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009.
41.
FreemanJ.R.HarilalS.S.DiwakarP.K.VerhoffB.HassaneinA.“Comparison of Optical Emission From Nanosecond and Femtosecond Laser Produced Plasma in Atmosphere and Vacuum Conditions”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2013. 87: 43–50.
42.
AntonyJ.K.JatanaG.S.VasaN.J.RajaV.L.N.S.LaxmisprsadA.S.“Modeling of Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for Very Low-Pressure Conditions”. Appl. Phys. A. 2010. 101: 161–165.
43.
GarciaC.C.LinderH.NeimaxK.“Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry: Current Shortcomings, Practical Suggestions for Improving Performance, and Experiments to Guide Future Development”. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 2009. 24(1): 14–26.
44.
WangJ.LiX.LiH.LiX.LiZ.“Lens-to-Sample Distance Effect on the Quantitative Analysis of Steel by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. J. Phys. D. 2020. 53(25): 255203.
45.
ZuhlkeC.A.BruceJ.IIIAndersonT.P.AlexanderD.R.PariggerC.G.“A Fundamental Understanding of the Dependence of the Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) Signal Strength on the Complex Focusing Dynamics of Femtosecond Laser Pulses on Either Side of the Focus”. Appl. Spectrosc. 2014. 68(9): 1021–1029.
