Community notification laws for sex offenders are now widespread in the USA and there is considerable interest in introducing ,them in Australia. Along with these public moves to name and shame, there has been a parallel increase in private forms of naming and shaming through “outing” of sex offenders. This article examines both public and private notification to conclude from the few studies available that they fail to achieve their goals and lead to significant unintended consequences. The article analyses The Australian Paedophile and Sex Offender Index (Coddington, 1997), a prime exemplar of the private domain of notification, to explore a range of variables (offender demographics, offence details, sentences, previous convictions and victimology) and concludes that it is unrepresentative and has criminogenic potential. The article summarises direct consequences of notification actions that include possibilities for vigilantism, effects on treatment and rehabilitation, and displacement. Finally, it examines the theoretical frameworks in which notification laws have been couched — restorative justice and criminological notions of shame and degradation — to conclude that notification laws are not supported by these theoretical paradigms
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelG.BeckerJ.MittelmanM.Cunningham-RathernM.RouleauJ.MurphyW. (1987). Self.reported sex crimes of non-incarcerated paraphiliacs, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2(1), 3–25.
2.
Australian Broadcasting Corporation(1998). Radio National Transcript. Sydney: ABC.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics(1996). Women's Safety Australia. Canberra:ABS.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics(1998). Year Book Australia 1998. Canberra: ABS.
5.
Australian Bureau of Statistics(2000). Year Book Australia 2000. Canberra: ABS.
6.
BestJ.(1990). Threatened Children: Rhetoric and Concern about Child-Victims. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BraithwaiteJ.1989. Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BraithwaiteJ.TonryM.1999aRestorative justice: assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol 25 (pp. 1–127). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BraithwaiteJ. (1999b). Zero tolerance, naming and shaming: Is there a case for it with crimes of the powerful? Paper presented to the ANZ Society of Criminology Conference, 30 September, Perth.
10.
BraithwaiteJ.DalyK. (1994). Masculinities, violence, and communitarian controlInNewburnTStankoB.(Eds.), Just Boys Doing Business? Men, Masculinity and Crime (pp. 189–213). London: Routledge.
11.
BraithwaiteJ.MugfordS.(1994). Conditions of successful reintegration ceremonies, British Journal of Criminology, 34(2), 139–171.
12.
CaseyJ.J.Is Megan's law showing a darker side?(1998). Alternatives to Incarceration, 4(5), 3–4.
13.
ClarkeR. (1997). Introduction. InClarkeR.(Ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (pp. 1–43). New York: Harrow and Heston.
14.
ClausenL. (1996). Sentences of shame, Time, 3 June, 42.
15.
CoddingtonD.(1997). The Australian Paedophile and Sex Offender Index. Sydney: Deborah Coddington.
16.
CohenS. (1987). Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and RockersOxford: Basil Blackwell.
17.
Criminal Justice CommissionReported Sexual Offences in QueenslandBrisbane: Criminal Justice Commission.
18.
CunneenM. (1997). Problems in the prosecution of paedophiles. Paper presented to the Australian Institute of Criminology Conference on Paedophilia: Policy and Prevention, University of Sydney, 14–15 April.
19.
DonatoR.ShanahanM.(1999). The Economics of Implementing Intensive In-Prison Sex Offender Treatment Programs, Trends and Issue Series No 134, Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
20.
EdwardsE.HardingR.CampbellI.(1992). The Criminal Codes: Commentary and Material. Sydney: Law Book Company.
21.
FaustB.(1997). Child sexuality and age of consent: The Netherlands model, Australasian Gay and Lesbian Law Journal, 5, 78–85.
22.
FeeleyM.M.SimonJ.(1992) The new penology: notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications, Criminology, 30(4), 449–474.
23.
FeeleyM.M.SimonJ. (1994). Actuarial justice: The emerging new criminal law. In NelkenD.(Ed.), The Futures of Criminology (pp. 173–204), London: Sage Publications.
24.
FinnP.(1997). Sex Offender Community Notification, Washington DC: Department of Justice.
25.
FlemingJ.M.(1997). Prevalence of childhood sexual abuse in a community sample of Australian women, Medical Journal of Australia, 166, 65–68.
26.
FurbyL.BlackshawL.WeinrottM. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: a review, Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 3–30.
27.
GarfinkelH. (1956). Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies, American Journal of Sociology, 61, 420–424.
28.
GarveyS.P. (1998).Can shaming punishments educate?The University of Chicago Law Review, 65(3), 733–794.
29.
GebhardP.H.GagnonJ.H.PomeroyW.B.ChristensonC.V. (1965). Sex Offenders: An Analysis of Types. London: Heinemann.
30.
GlaserW. (1997). Paedophilia: the public health problem of the decade. Paper presented to the Australian Institute of Criminology Conference on Paedophilia: Policy and Prevention, University of Sydney, 14–15 April.
31.
GoldmanR.GoldmanJ.(1988), The prevalence and nature of child sexual abuse in Australia, Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage and Family, 9, 94–106.
32.
GrantA. (2000). The Historical Development of Treatment for Adolescent Sex Offenders, Trends and Issues Series No 145, Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
33.
GrubinD. (1999). Actuarial and clinical assessment of risk in sex.offendersJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(3), 331–343.
34.
HarrisN.BurtonJ.B. (1997), The Reliability of Observed Reintegrative Shaming, Shame, Defiance and Other Key Concepts in Diversionary Conferences, RISE Working Paper No 5, Canberra: Australian National University.
35.
HindsL. (1997), Community Notification of Sex Offenders: The Attempted Expulsion of Evil from US Society in the 1990sMA(Hons) Thesis,Brisbane: Griffith University.
36.
HollinC.R.HowellsK.(1994). Clinical Approaches to Sex Offenders and Their Victims. Chichester: Wiley.
37.
HoodM.BoltjeC. (1998). The progress of 500 referrals from the child protection response system to the criminal court, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 31(2). 182–195.
38.
HoweA.(Ed.) (1998). Sexed Crimes in the News. Sydney: Federation Press.
39.
HowellsD.DayA. (1999). The Rehabilitation of Offenders: International Perspectives Applied to Australian Correctional Systems, Trends and Issues Series No 112,Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
40.
JamesM. (1998). Paedophilia: Policy and Prevention, Research and Public Policy Series No 12, Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
41.
KabatA.R. (1998). Scarlet letter sex offender databases and community notification: sacrificing personal privacy for a symbol's sake, The American Criminal Law Review, 35(2), 333–370.
42.
KarpD.R.(1998). The judicial and judicious: use of shame penalties, Crime and Delinquency, 44(2), 277–294.
43.
KennyD. (1997). Opinion, policy and practice in child sexual abuse: implications for detection and reporting. Paper presented to the Australian Institute of Criminology Conference on Paedophilia: Policy and Prevention, University of Sydney, 14–15 April.
44.
LemertE. (1967). Social Pathology. New York: MacGraw-Hill.
45.
LeviR. (2000). The mutuality of risk and community: The adjudication of community notifica-tion statutes, Economy and Society29(4), forthcoming.
46.
MillerK. (1997). Detection and reporting of paedophilia: a law enforcement perspective. Paper presented to the Australian Institute of Criminology Conference on Paedophilia: Policy and Prevention, University of Sydney, 14–15 April.
47.
MorrisonT.EroogaM.BeckettR. (1994). Sexual Offending Against Children: Assessment and Treatment of Male Abusers. London: Routledge.
48.
National Criminal Justice Association (1997). The right to privacy?NCJA Bulletin, 17(12), 13–16.
49.
NaylorB. (1984). Prosecution of cases of child sexual assault, Legal Services Bulletin, 9, 296–298.
50.
NicholsonJ. (1997). Defence of alleged paedophiles: why do we need to bother? Paper presented to the Australian Institute of Criminology Conference on Paedophilia: Policy and Prevention, University of Sydney, 14–15 April.
51.
OatesK. (1997). Sexual abuse of children: extent and consequences. Paper presented to the Australian Institute of Criminology Conference on Paedophilia: Policy and Prevention, University of Sydney, 14–15 April.
52.
PetrosinoA.J.PetrosinoC. (1999). The public safety potential of Megan's Law in Massachusetts: an assessment from a sample of criminal sexual psychopaths, Crime and Delinquency, 45 (1), 140–158.
53.
PincusW. (1998). Megan's Law and the protection of the child in the on.line age, The American Criminal Law Review, 35(4), 1319–1341.
54.
PrattJ. (2000a). Emotive and ostentatious punishment, Punishment and Society, 2(4), 417–439.
55.
PrattJ.(2000b). Sex crimes and the new punitivenessBehavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 135–151.
56.
PresserL.GunnisonE. (1999). Strange bedfellows: Is sex offender notification a form of community justice?Crime and Delinquency, 45(3), 299–315.
57.
ScholleA. (2000). Sex offender registration community notification laws, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, July, 17–24.
58.
ShermanL.W.StrangH. (1997a). Restorative Justice and Deterring Crime, RISE Working Paper No 4, Canberra: Australian National University.
59.
ShermanL.W.StrangH. (1997). The Right Kind of Shame for Crime Prevention, RISE Working Paper No 1, Canberra: Australian National University.
60.
ShermanL.W.SchmidtJ.D.RoganD.T. (1992). Policing Domestic Violence. New York: Free Press.
61.
SoothillK.WalbyS. (1991). Sex Crime in the News. London: Routledge.
62.
SteinbockB. (1995). A policy perspective, Criminal Justice Ethics, 14(2), 4–9.
63.
StrangH. (2000). The future of restorative justice. InChappellD.WilsonP.(Eds.), Crime and the Criminal Justice System in Australia: 2000 and Beyond(pp. 22–33). Sydney: Butterworths.
64.
SuretteR. (1994). Predator criminals as media icons. InBarakG.(Eds.), Media Process and the Social Construction of Crime(pp. 131–158). New York: Garland Publishing.
65.
SzaszT.S. (1970). The Manufacture of Madness: A Comparative Study of the Inquisition and the Mental Health Movement. St Albans: Paladin.
66.
TornisonA. (1995). Update on child sexual abuse, Issues in Child Abuse Prevention, 5.
67.
UmbreitM.S. (1998). Restorative justice through victim-offender mediation: a multi-site assessment, Western Criminology Review, available online at http://wcr.sonoma.edu, 1–27.
68.
Van de VenP.KippaxS.CrawfordJ.RaceK.RoddenP. (1998). Homophobic and HIV.related abuse and discrimination experienced by gay and homosexually active men in an Australian national sample, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 31(2), 141–159.
69.
WalkerP. (1997). Never forget, never forgive, New Statesman, 10, 22–24.
70.
WatkinsJ. (1997). Theoretical Overview of the Psychopathology and Rehabilitation of Males Who Sexually Abuse Children, Independent Study Dissertation, Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
71.
WhitmanJ.Q. (1998). What is wrong with inflicting shame sanctions? The Yale Law Journal, 107(4), 1055–1092.
72.
WilczynskiA.SinclairK. (1999). Moral tales: representations of child abuse in the quality and tabloid media, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 32(3), 262–283.
73.
WilsonP. (1998). Sexual Offences and Offenders. Presentation to the Sexual Health Society of Queensland, Brisbane, 22 April.
74.
WorralA. (1997). Punishment in the Community: The future of criminal justice, London: Longman.
75.
WyreR. (1998). Sex abuse of children, Background Briefing, Radio National Transcripts, Sydney: Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 30 August.
76.
YoungJ. (1971). The role of police as amplifiers of deviancy, negotiators of reality and translators offantasy. InCohenS.(Ed.), Images of Deviance(pp. 27–61). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
77.
ZevitzR.G.FarkasM.A. (2000). The impact of sex.offender community notification on probation/parole in Wisconsin, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44(1), 8–21.
