A central feature of new law enforcement agencies, established specifically to combat organised crime in Australia, is their use of internal multi-disciplinary investigation teams. This strategy can be seen as mirroring the structure and modus operandi of the targeted criminal activity. One of the first law enforcement agencies in Australia to 'collectivise' legal and policing skills has been the National Crime Authority. However, aspects of the legal and police 'sub-cultures' are structurally and ideologically inconsistent creating the potential for significant intra-organisational conflict. This article explores the nature and significance of 'cultural clashes' between lawyers and police within the National Crime Authority, and describes a number of unique legal problems arising from the cross-jurisdictional deployment of police officers on secondment to the National Crime Authority. The article argues that in the context of organised crime, sub-cultural dimensions of law enforcement has been a neglected area within criminological research and policy making. The article argues that organisational sub-cultures have limited the capacity of law enforcement agencies to fulfil their junctions and suggests a number of reforms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen Consulting, Arthur Andersen and Co (1989) Final Report on the Strategic Organisational Review of the National Crime Authority(unpublished).
2.
BerstenM (1990)‘‘Making ICAC Work: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Accountability’ Current Issues in Criminal Justice vol1 (2) 67117
3.
BittnerI (1969) ‘The Police on Skid-Row: A Study of Peace Keeping’ inCrime and the Legal Process(ed)ChamblissW J. McGraw Hill.
4.
BuxtonJ (1988) ‘The National Crime Authority: Its Role in Investigating Fraud’ Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration56:98–100.
ChappellD (1986) ‘From the Rum Rebellion to Nugan Hand: Perspective on Australian Roguery’ inThe Australian Criminal Justice System(eds)ChappellDWilsonP. Sydney: Butterworths: 276–93.
7.
CornsC (1991) ‘New Directions for the NCA’ Legal Services Bulletinvol 16(3) 113–6.
8.
CostiganF (1984) ‘Organised Crime and a Free Society’ANZ Journal of Criminology17: 7–19.
9.
— (1986) ‘Control of Organised Crime with Reflections on Sydney’ University of Sydney, Proceedings of the Institute of Criminology, The Control of Organised Crimevol 67: 10–16.
10.
CusackG (1989) ‘The Role of the National Crime Authority’ speech to North Sydney Rotary Club(unpublished).
11.
DornNMurjiKSouthN (1990) ‘Mirroring the Market?: Police Reorganisation and Effectiveness Against Drug Trafficking’ submitted for publication inBeyond Law and Order: Criminal Justice Policy and Politics into the 1990s', ReinerRCrossM(eds). London: MacMillan.
12.
DornNSouthN (1990) ‘Drug Markets and Law Enforcement’ British Journal of Criminology30:171–88.
13.
FarisP (1990) ‘Corruption As a Fundamental Element of Organised Crime’ inFourth International Anti-Corruption Conference, Sydney: Commonwealth Government Printing Service: 29–34.
14.
— (1989) ‘The Role of the National Crime Authority in Australian Law Enforcement’, speech to Queen's Inn University of Melbourne 8 August (unpublished).
15.
FarsonS (1990) ‘Old Wine, New Bottles and Fancy Labels: The Rediscovery of Organisation Culture in the Control of Intelligence’ inCrimes by the Capitalist State: An Introduction to State CriminalityBarakG(ed). New York: University of New York.
16.
FreibergA (1988(a)) ‘Ripples from the Bottom of the Harbour: Some Social Ramifications of Taxation Fraud’ Criminal Law Journal12:136–92.
17.
— (1988(b)) ‘“Civilising” Crime: Parallel Proceedings and the Civil Remedies Function of the Director of Public Prosecution’ ANZ Journal of Criminology12:129–43.
18.
HuntD ‘Transcript of Evidence’ Adelaide Hearings of PJC 1991.
19.
LeckieJ (1989) ‘Organised Crime in Australia: An NCA Perspective’ paper given at conference Organised Crime Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 5–7 September 1989.
20.
ManningP K (1980) The Narc's Game: Organisation and Informational Limits on Drug Law EnforcementCambridge: MIT Press.
21.
MoffitA (1985) A Quarter to Midnight: The Australia Crisis: Organised Crime and the Decline of the Institution of the State. North Ryde: Angus and Robertson.
22.
National Crime Authority (1990) Submission of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on the National Crime Authority: Evaluation of the National Crime Authority(unpublished).
23.
— (1991) Corporate Plan: July 1991 — June 1994, released in August.
24.
Police Federation of Australia and New Zealand, Submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on the National Crime Authority(21 October 1990), reprinted in Joint Parliamentary Committee on the National Crime Authority, Evaluation of the National Crime Authority, Submissions Received up until 5 November 1990 vol III (submissions 20–27) Order to be published and released by resolution of the Committee on 5 November1990:2–3.
25.
Parliamentary Joint Committee on the National Crime Authority (1985) First Report. Pl'ty paper 501/1985, Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
26.
— (1986) Second Report. Pl'ty paper 439/1986, Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
27.
— (1989) Third Report. Pl'ty paper 452/1989, Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
28.
— (1988) The National Crime Authority: An Initial Evaluation. Pl'ty paper 378/1988, Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
29.
— (1991) Who is to Guard the Guards? An Evaluation of the National Crime AuthorityNovember 1991Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
30.
PunchM (1985) Conduct Unbecoming: The Social Construction of Police Deviance and ControlLondon: Tavistock.
31.
RobberdsL (1990) ‘Investigative Powers of the National Crime Authority’ Current Issues in Criminal Justicevol 2(2) 25–38.
32.
RogersH (1990) PJC ‘Transcript of Evidence’ Melbourne Hearing, November: 398.
33.
—Submission as the future of the National Crime Authority13 September 1990, reprinted in PJC Submissions received up until 5 November 1990 vol 1 (submissions 1–18) para 2.4.
34.
Royal Commission on the Activities of the Federated Ship Painters and Dockers Union (Commissioner F X Costigan QC) (1984) AGPS Final Reportvols 1–11 (the ‘Costigan Report’); the Costigan Commission also produced 5 Interim Reports.
35.
Royal Commission of Inquiry into Drug Trafficking (Commissioner Hon Mr Justice D G Stewart)Final Report (1983) Pari Papers No 41 of 1983, AGPS, Canberra (the ‘Stewart Report’).
36.
StrongE (1990) ‘The Proliferation of Investigative Agencies: Demarcation and Intelligence Tensions’ Current Issues in Criminal Justicevol 1(2) 9–24.
37.
PoliceTasmania, (undated) ‘Submission on the Evaluation of the National Crime Authority’ (unpublished).
38.
WardlawG (1988) ‘Drug Control Policies and Organised Crime’ inUnderstanding Crime and Criminal Justice (edsFinlayMHoggR). Sydney: Law Book Co149–66.
39.
WeinbergM (1989) ‘Corruption Commissions: Privatisation of the Police Function’ paper delivered at 26th Australian Legal Convention, Sydney, 17 August 1989.
40.
— (1991) ‘The Presentation of Complex Corporate Prosecutions of Juries: The Course of Evidence’ address to National Crime Authority Conference, The Presentation of Complex Corporate Prosecution to Juries 22 July 1991–24July 1991 (unpublished).
