Professional autonomy is a much-used concept which has operated with scant empirical attention directed at understanding its meaning among practitioners. This study investigates how General Practitioners (GPs) understand their professional autonomy, and what they perceive to be the main threats to it. Four focus groups were attended by 25 GPs in Melbourne. We found that GPs aspire to an ‘ideal type’ of professional who has the freedom to determine what is best for patients, but they believe their autonomy is threatened by financial constraints, greater accountability requirements, and more demanding patients. These findings reveal how GPs understand autonomy in their practice, and indicate that their concerns may have little to do with the deprofessionalization and proletarianization theses. Micro-level studies of GPs in the workplace, combined with greater understandings of different aspects of professional autonomy, appear useful in understanding how GPs’ work and autonomy is changing.
Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee (AMWAC) and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (1998) Medical Workforce Supply and Demand – A Discussion Paper, AMWAC report 1998.8. Sydney: AMWAC.
2.
Bollen, M. and D. Saltman (2000) ‘A History of General Practice in Australia’, pp. 3–39 in Commonwealth of Australia, General Practice in Australia: 2000. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care.
3.
Calnan, M. and S. Williams (1995) ‘Challenges to Professional Autonomy in the United Kingdom? The Perceptions of General Practitioners’, International Journal of Health Services25(2): 219–241.
4.
Collyer, F. and K. White (1997) ‘Enter the Market: Competition, Regulation and Hospital Funding in Australia’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology33(3): 344–363.
5.
Dent, M. (1998) ‘Hospitals and New Ways of Organising Medical Work in Europe: Standardisation of Medicine in the Public Sector and the Future of Medical Autonomy’, pp. 204–224 in P. Thompson and C. Warhurst (eds) Workplaces of the Future. London: Macmillan.
6.
Department of Health and Ageing (2002) Medicare Statistics. http://www.health.gov.au/haf/medstats/index.htm, website accessed on 9 September, 2002.
7.
Easthope, C. and G. Easthope (2000) ‘Intensification, Extension and Complexity of Teachers’ Workload’, British Journal of Sociology and Education21(1): 43–58.
8.
Eastwood, H. (2000) ‘Why Are Australian GPs Using Alternative Medicine? Postmodernisation, Consumerism and the Shift towards Holistic Health’, Journal of Sociology36(2): 133–156.
9.
Elston, M.-A. (1991) ‘The Politics of Professional Power’, pp. 58–88 in J. Gabe, M. Calnan and M. Bury (eds) The Sociology of the Health Service. London: Routledge.
10.
Eve, R. and P. Hodgkin (1997) ‘Professionalism and Medicine’, pp. 69–85 in J. Broadbent, M. Dietrich and J. Roberts (eds) The End of Professions? The Restructuring of Professional Work. London: Routledge.
11.
Freidson, E. (1970) Medical Dominance. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
12.
Freidson, E. (1988) Profession of Medicine. London: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Freidson, E. (1994) Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy and Policy. Cambridge: Polity.
14.
General Practice Consultative Committee (1992) The Future of General Practice: A Strategy for the Nineties and Beyond. Canberra: Australian Medical Association, Department of Health, Housing and Community Services, and the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.
15.
General Practice Strategy Review Group (1998) General Practice: Changing the Future through Partnerships. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services.
16.
Good, M.-J.D. (1998) American Medicine: The Quest for Competence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17.
Hafferty, F. and D. Light (1995) ‘Professional Dynamics and the Changing Nature of Medical Work’, Journal of Health and Social Behavior Extra Issue: 132–153.
18.
Harding, J. (2000) ‘The Supply and Distribution of General Practitioners’, pp. 41–73 in Commonwealth of Australia General Practice in Australia: 2000. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care.
19.
Harrison, S. and W. Ahmad (2000) ‘Medical Autonomy and the UK State 1975 to 2025’, Sociology34(1): 129–146.
20.
Harrison, S. , C. Pohlman and G. Mercer (1984) ‘Concepts of Clinical Freedom amongst English Physicians’, Conference on Clinical Autonomy, King’s Fund Centre, London, 8 June.
21.
Haug, M. (1988) ‘A Reexamination of the Hypothesis of Physician Deprofessionalization’, Milbank Quarterly66(2): 48–56.
22.
Hunter, D. (1996) ‘The Changing Roles of Health Care Personnel in Health and Health Care Management’, Social Science and Medicine43(5): 799–808.
23.
Hynes, T. (2000) ‘The Financing of General Practice’, pp. 235–269 in Commonwealth of Australia General Practice in Australia: 2000. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care.
24.
Lewis, J.M. (2002) ‘Policy and Profession: Elite Perspectives on Redefining General Practice in Australia and England’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy7S1: 8–13.
25.
Light, D. (1995) ‘Countervailing Powers: A Framework for Profession in Transition’, pp. 25–44 in T. Johnson, G. Larkin and M. Saks (eds) Health Professions and the State in Europe. London: Routledge.
26.
Light, D. and S. Levine (1988) ‘The Changing Character of the Medical Profession: A Theoretical Overview’, Milbank Quarterly66(2): 10–32.
27.
Lofland, J. and L. Lofland (1995) Analysing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 3rd ednBelmont, CA: Wadsworth.
28.
Lupton, D. (1997) ‘Doctors on the Medical Profession’, Sociology of Health and Illness19(4): 480–497.
29.
Macdonald, K.M. (1995) The Sociology of the Professions. London: Sage.
30.
Morgan, D. (1996) ‘Focus Groups’, Annual Review of Sociology22: 129–152.
31.
National Health Strategy (1992) The Future of General Practice, Issues paper no 3. Melbourne: National Health Strategy.
32.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (1996) Health Care Reform: The Will to Change. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
33.
Patton, M.Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ednNewbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Power, P. and J. Aloizos (2000) ‘The Operating Environment of General Practice’, pp. 156–195 in Commonwealth of Australia General Practice in Australia: 2000. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care.
35.
Saltman, R. and J. Figueras (1997) European Health Care Reform: Analysis of Current Strategies. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.
36.
Schulz, R. and S. Harrison (1986) ‘Physician Autonomy in the Federal Republic of Germany, Great Britain and the United States’, International Journal of Health Planning and Management2: 335–355.
37.
Siahpush, M. (1998) ‘Postmodern Values, Dissatisfaction with Conventional Medicine and Popularity of Alternative Therapies’, Journal of Sociology34(1): 58–70.
38.
Sommerlad, H. (2001) ‘“I’ve Lost the Plot”: An Everyday Story of Legal Aid Lawyers’, Journal of Law and Society28(3): 335–360.
39.
Strauss, A. and J. Corbin (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
Warhurst, C. and P. Thompson (1998) ‘Hands, Hearts and Minds: Changing Work and Workers at the End of the Century’, pp. 1–24 in P. Thompson and C. Warhurst (eds) Workplaces of the Future. London: Macmillan.
41.
White, K. (2000) ‘The State, the Market, and General Practice: The Australian Case’, International Journal of Health Services30(2): 285–308.
42.
White, K. and F. Collyer (1998) ‘Health Care Markets in Australia: Ownership of the Private Hospital Sector’, International Journal of Health Services28: 487–510.
43.
Willis, E. (1988) ‘Doctoring in Australia: A View at the Bicentenary’, The Milbank Quarterly66 (Suppl. 2): 167–181.
44.
Wilsford, D. (1995) ‘States Facing Interests: Struggles over Health Care Policy in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law20(3): 571–576.
45.
Yin, R. (1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, revised ednNewbury Park, CA: Sage.
