Academic abilities were substantially correlated with academic self-concept for Year 6 students (n = 305), but were uncorrelated with non-academic self-concepts. Schools for this study were specifically chosen to represent the highest and lowest strata of socioeconomic status (SES) within the same geographical area, and students from the high-SES schools were substantially higher in family SES, reading ability, IQ, and teacher ratings of academic ability. Nevertheless, students from the high-SES schools had paradoxically lower academic self-concepts after controlling for academic ability and/or family SES. Thus, academic self-concept is positively affected by individual ability and SES, but is negatively affected by school-average values of these same variables. These paradoxical findings are consistent with a frame of reference model which hypothesizes that students appraise their own academic ability, compare this with the observed abilities of other children in the school, and use this relativistic impression of their ability to form their academic self-concept. Thus, a given child will see him/herself to be relatively more able in a low-SES/ability school and will form a more favourable academic self-concept than if the same child is in a high-SES/ability school.
References
1.
Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).Test of Learning Ability.Hawthorn, Vic.: ACER, 1976.
2.
Australian Council for Educational Research.Progressive Achievement Tests: Reading Comprehension and Reading Vocabulary.Hawthorn, Vic.: ACER, 1973.
3.
BachmanJ. G.Youth in Transition, Vol. 2: The Impact of Family Background and Intelligence on Tenth-grade Boys.Ann Arbor. Mich: Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center, 1970.
4.
BachmanJ. G., and O'MalleyP. M.Self-esteem in young men: A longitudinal analysis of the impact of educational and occupational attainment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 365–80.
5.
BrookoverW. B., and PassalacquaJ.Comparison of aggregate self-concepts for populations with different reference groups. In LynchM., Noren-HebeisenA., and GergenW. (Eds), Self-concept: Advances in Theory and Practice.Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger (1981).
6.
BurnsR. B.The Self-Concept: Theory, Measurement, Development and Behaviour.London: Longman, 1979.
7.
CohenJ., and CohenP.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1975.
8.
CongaltonA.Occupational Status in Australia.Sydney: University of New South Wales, 1963.
HullC. H., and NieN. H.SPSS Update 7-9.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.
13.
LewinK.Resolving Social Conflicts.New York: Harper & Row, 1948.
14.
MarshH. W.Judgmental anchoring: Stimulus and response variables. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1974.
15.
MarshH. W., BarnesJ., CairnsL., and TidmanM.The Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ): Age effects in the structure and level of self-concept for preadolescent children.Journal of Educational Psychology, in press.
16.
MarshH. W., ParkerJ. W., and SmithI. D.Preadolescent self-concept: Its relation to self-concept as inferred by teachers and to academic ability.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1983, 53, 60–78.
17.
MarshH. W., RelichJ., and SmithI. D.Self-concept: The construct validity of interpretations based upon the SDQ.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45, 173–87.
18.
MarshH. W., and SmithI. D.Multitrait-multimethod analyses of two self-concept instruments.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982, 74, 430–40.
19.
MarshH. W., SmithI. D., and BarnesJ.Multitrait-multimethod analysis of the Self Description Questionnaire: Student-teacher agreement on multidimensional ratings of student self-concept.American Educational Research Journal, 1983, 20, 333–57.
20.
MaruyamaG., RubinR. A., and KingsburyG. G.Self-esteem and educational achievement: Independent constructs with a common cause?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 40, 962–75.
21.
NieH. H., HullC. H., JenkinsJ. G., SteinbrennerK., and BentD. H.Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
22.
PriceH.Ridge regression: Application to non-experimental data.Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 759–66.
23.
PurkeyW. W.Self-concept and School Achievement.Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, 1970.
ShavelsonR. J., and BolusR.Self-concept: The interplay of theory and methods.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982, 74, 3–17.
26.
ShavelsonR. J., HubnerJ. J., and StantonG. C.Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations.Review of Educational Research, 1976, 46, 407–41.
27.
SherifM., and SherifC. W.Social Psychology.New York: Harper & Row, 1969.
28.
SoaresA. T., and SoaresL. M.Self-perceptions of culturally disadvantaged children.American Educational Research Journal, 1969, 6, 31–45.
29.
StrangL., SmithM. D., and RogersC. M.Social comparison, multiple reference groups, and the self-concepts of academically handicapped children before and after mainstreaming.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978, 70, 487–97.
30.
TrowbridgeN. T.Self-concept and socioeconomic class.Psychology in the Schools, 1970, 7, 304–6.
31.
TrowbridgeN.Self-concept and socioeconomic status in elementary school children.American Educational Research Journal, 1972, 9, 525–37.
32.
UpshawH. S.The personal reference scale: An approach to social judgment. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. IV). New York: Academic Press, 1969.
33.
VolkmanJ.Scales of judgement and their implications for social psychology. In RohrerJ. H., and SherifM. (Eds), Social Psychology at the Crossroads.New York: Harper, 1951.
34.
WellsL. E., and MarwellG.Self-esteem: Its Conceptualization and Measurement.Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 1976.
35.
WolfleL. M.Strategies of path analysis.American Educational Research Journal, 1980, 17, 183–209.
36.
WylieR. C.The Self-Concept (Vol. 1). (Rev. ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1974.
37.
WylieR. C.The Self-Concept, Vol. 2: Theory and Research on Selected Topics.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1979.
