Scholars and practitioners alike indicate a movement in corporate philanthropy toward “strategic” giving, for example, giving that improves the firm's strategic position (ultimately the “bottom line”) while it benefits the recipient of the philanthropic act. Although the existence of this trend is widely accepted, it is represented in the literature most often by anecdotal evidence. This article presents the findings of a survey of corporate giving managers of U.S. firms that have had an established giving program of at least 5 years, with annual giving totaling at least $200,000 each year. The data show that corporate giving managers believe their firms are becoming increasingly strategic in their philanthropic activities. The findings also indicate that institutional-, firm-, and individual-level influences combine to precipitate strategic philanthropy. These findings lend support to the belief that the nature of corporate philanthropy is evolving to fit a more competitive marketplace.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altman, B. W. (1997). Corporate community relations in the 1990's: A study in transformation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
2.
Aupperle, K. E. (1982). An empirical inquiry into social responsibilities as defined by corporations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
3.
Babbie, E. R. (1995). The practice of social research (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4.
Barnes, R. (1995). Americans value business' philanthropic performance, study finds. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 13, 1-4.
5.
Beatty, R. P., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Managerial incentives, monitoring and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership and board structure in initial public offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 313-335.
6.
Buchholtz, A., Amason, A. C., & Rutherford, M. (1999). Beyond resources: The mediating effect of management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Business & Society, 38(2), 167-187.
7.
Burke, L., Logsdon, J., Mitchell, W., Reiner, M., & Vogel, D. (1986). Corporate community involvement in the San Francisco bay area. California Management Review, 28, 122-141.
8.
Burlingame, D. F. (2001). Corporate giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 6(1), 4-5.
9.
Burlingame, D. F., & Frishkoff, P. A. (1996). How does firm size affect corporate philanthropy? In D. F. Burlingame & D. R. Young (Eds.), Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads (pp. 86-104). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
11.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). Corporate social performance measurement: A commentary on methods for evaluating an elusive construct. Research in corporate social performance and policy, 12, 42, 385-401.
12.
Carroll, A. B. (1996). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
13.
Conference Board. (1996). Annual survey of corporate contributions. New York: Conference Board.
14.
Corcoran, C. P. (1987). Corporate philanthropy: Attitudes of institutional shareholders, individual shareholders, and corporate philanthropy executives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
15.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
16.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West.
17.
Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
19.
Forbes 500 Database. (1997). Nexus/Lexus. New York: Forbes.
20.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979-81, 1987-89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 445-471.
21.
Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S. (1991). Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1), 445-471.
22.
Giving USA. (1995). The annual report of philanthropy for the year 1994. New York: AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy.
23.
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5-31.
24.
Himmelstein, J. L. (1997). Looking good & doing good. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
25.
Hoffman, A. (1995). The environmental transformation of American industry: An institutional account of organizational evolution in the chemical and petroleum industries (1960-1993). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
26.
Jones, R. E. (1994, March). A theory of firm philanthropy: The philanthropic capacity of the firm. Paper presented at the IABS annual meeting proceedings, Myrtle Beach, SC.
27.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
28.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
29.
Korten, D. C. (1993). When corporations rule the world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
30.
Lewin, D., & Sabater, J. M. (1996). Corporate philanthropy and business performance. In D. F. Burlingame & D. R. Young (Eds.), Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads (pp. 105-112). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
31.
Logsdon, J., Reiner, M., & Burke, L. (1990). Corporate philanthropy: Strategic responses to the firm's stakeholders. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19(2), 93-109.
32.
Martin, N. (1998). A natural progression. Corporate Philanthropy Report, 13(10), 2-6.
33.
Marx, J. D. (1994). The effects of strategic philanthropy on corporate support of health and human services. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College.
34.
Mescon, J., & Tilson, D. J. (1987). Corporate philanthropy: A strategic approach to the bottom-line. California Management Review, 29(2), 49-61.
35.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
36.
Miles, R. (1987). Managing the corporate social environment: A grounded theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
Mokhiber, R., & Weissman, R. (1999). Corporate crime reporter. Retrieved February 25, 1999, from http//www.essential.org/monitor
38.
Mulrine, M. (1995). The annual report of philanthropy for the year 1994. New York: AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy.
39.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
Payton, R. L. (1988). Philanthropy: Voluntary action for the public good. New York: Macmillan.
41.
Post, J. E., & Waddock, S. A. (1995). Strategic philanthropy and partnerships for economic progress, philanthropy and economic development. In R. F. America (Ed.), Philanthropy and economic development (pp. 167-191). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
42.
Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
43.
Saiia, D. (1999). Strategic philanthropy: Corporate resources for the public good. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
44.
Saiia, D. (2001). Corporate citizenship and corporate philanthropy: Strategic philanthropy is good corporate citizenship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1(2), 1-19.
45.
Saiia, D. H. (1997). Personal interviews with 7 corporate giving executives from the Atlanta area. Unpublished manuscript.
46.
Schmitt, C. H. (2000, December 18). Corporate charity: Why it's slowing. Business Week, pp. 184-186.
47.
Schriesheim, C. A., Powers, K. J., Scandura, T. A., Gardiner, C. C., & Lankau, M. J. (1993). Improving construct measurement in management research—Comments and quantitative approach for assessing the theoretical content adequacy of paper-and-pencil surveytype instruments. Journal of Management, 19(2), 385-417.
48.
Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(3), 493-511.
49.
Scott, W. R. (1994). Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
Sharfman, M. (1994). Changing institutional rules: The evolution of corporate philanthropy, 1883-1953. Business & Society, 33(3), 236-269.
51.
Sinclair, M. (2002). Corporate giving posts worst numbers since 1998. The Non-Profit Times, 16(13), 4-6.
52.
Smith, C. (1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 105-115.
53.
Smith, C. (1996). Desperately seeking data: Why research is crucial to the new corporate philanthropy. In D. F. Burlingame & D. R. Young (Eds.), Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads (pp. 1-6). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
54.
Starik, M., & Rands, G. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908-935.
55.
Steiner, G. A. (1969). Top management planning. New York: Random House.
56.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
57.
Weeden, C. (1998). Corporate social investing. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
58.
Werbel, J. D., & Wortman, M. S. (2000). Strategic philanthropy: Responding to the negative portrayals of social responsibility. Corporate Reputation Review, 3, 124-136.
59.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.
60.
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1996). Research in corporate social performance: What have we learned? In D. F. Burlingame & D. R. Young (Eds.), Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
61.
Zucker, L. (1988). Institutional patterns and organizations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
