Stories of firms that exceed local compliance requirements in their environmental performance appear routinely. However, we have limited theoretical explanations of what propels these firms to exceed compliance. Our theory suggests that global competitive and institutional pressures lead multinational firms to develop highlevel, environmental management systems (EMS) that make them more competitive. For economic and other reasons, select firms make the choice to rationalize their collective environmental performance to the highest common denominator rather than the lowest. Regulations around the world differ widely and are a moving target in many settings. The need to comply with such myriad, shifting rules leads to firms creating EMS to help stay ahead of regulations worldwide. Using institutional and internationalization theories as our basis, we offer a propositional model concerning global competitive/institutional pressures and their effects on corporate environmental performance. We conclude the paper with a discussion of the implications of the model.
Allenby, B. R. (2000). The fallacy of “green technology.” American Behavioral Scientist, 44(2), 213-228.
3.
Andrews, C. (1998). Environmental business strategy: Corporate leaders’perceptions. Society and Natural Resources, 11, 531-540.
4.
Aragôn-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71-88.
5.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
6.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Biondi, V., Frey, M., & Iraldo, F. (2000). Environmental management systems and SMEs. Greener Management International, 29, 55-70.
9.
Birdsall, N., & Wheeler, D. (1992). Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: Where are the pollution havens? In Patrick Low (Ed.), International trade and the environment. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (in press). Globalization and the environment. Journal of International Business Studies.
12.
Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., & Mamingi, N. (1998). Capital market responses to environmental performance in developing countries. Boston: World Bank, Development Research Group.
14.
Dean, J. W., Jr., Sharfman, M. P., & Ford, C. A. (1991). Strategic decision making: A multiplecontext framework. In J. Meindl, R. Cardy, & W. Puffer (Eds.), Advances in information processing in organizations (Vol. 4, pp. 77-110). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15.
Dean, T. J., & Brown, R. L. (1995). Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: Initial evidence and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 288-303.
16.
de Borchgrave, R. (1993). It’s not easy being green: Developing an EC environmental strategy. The Journal of European Business, 4(3), 48-53.
17.
Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1024-1039.
18.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
19.
Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1999). Are conglomerates less environmentally responsible? An empirical examination of diversification strategy and subsidiary pollution in the U.S. chemical industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 1-14.
Dowell, G., Hart, S. L., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 48(8), 1059-1074.
22.
Economist. (1992, February 8). Let them eat pollution. Economist, 322(7745), 66.
23.
Eliste, P. (2002). Three empirical essays on environmental regulations, strategic interaction, and regional trade agreements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University.
24.
Eskeland, G. S., & Harrison, A. E. (1997). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis (Working Paper Series No. 1744). Washington, DC: World Bank.
25.
Feldman, S., Soyka, P. A., & Ameer, P. (1996). Does improving a firm’s environmental management system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price? Washington, DC: ICF Kaiser International.
26.
Ferrantino, M. (1997). International trade, environmental quality and public policy. World Economy, 20(1), 43-72.
27.
Florida, R., & Davison, D. (2001). Gaining from green management: Environmental management systems inside and outside the factory. California Management Review, 43(3), 64-84.
28.
Gallarotti, G. M. (1995). It pays to be green: The managerial incentive structure and environmentally sound strategies. Columbia Journal of World Business, 30(4), 38-58.
Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. (1993). Horses for courses: Organizational forms for multinational corporations. Sloan Management Review, 34(2), 23-34.
31.
Grant, R. M. (1995). Contemporary strategy analysis: Concepts, techniques, applications (2nd ed.). New York: Blackwell.
32.
Hamilton, J. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the Toxic Release Inventory Data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 98-113.
33.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1002.
34.
Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30-37.
35.
Haveman, H. A. (1993). Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 593-627.
36.
Hill, C. W. L. (2003). International business: Competing in the global marketplace (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
37.
Hoffman, A. (1997). From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. San Francisco: New Lexington.
38.
Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-371.
39.
Hoffman, A. J. (2001). Linking organizational and field-level analyses: The diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organization & Environment, 14(2), 133-156.
International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2001). Environmental protection and business competitiveness, summary paper (Prepared for The Public Policy Forum). Retrieved September 29, 2003, from http://www.ppforum.com/ow/ow_p_03_2001A.pdf.
42.
Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20, 1015-1052.
Kappas, P. (2000). The impact of chemical industry self-regulation (Working Paper). Brem Graduate School of Management, University of California Santa Barbara.
45.
Khanna, M., & Anton, W. Q. (2001). Corporate environmental management: Regulatory and market-based incentives. Paper presented at the U.S. EPA Beyond Compliance Conference, Washington, DC.
46.
Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 48(2), 1199-1215.
47.
Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599-615.
48.
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64-81.
Levitt, T. (1983). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 92-102.
51.
Lewis, G. J., & Harvey, B. (2001). Perceived environmental uncertainty: The extension of Miller’s Scale to the natural environment. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 201-235.
52.
Leonard, H. J. (1988). Pollution and the struggle for the world product. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Letchumanan, R. L., & Kodama, F. (2000). Reconciling the conflict between the “pollution haven” hypothesis and an emerging trajectory of international technology transfer. Research Policy, 29(1), 59-79.
54.
Low, P., & Yeats, A. (1992). Do “dirty” industries migrate? In Patrick Low (Ed.), International trade and the environment. Washington, DC: World Bank.
55.
Lucas, R. E. B., Wheeler, D., & Hettige, H. (1992). Economic development, environmental regulation and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution, 1960-1988. In Patrick Low (Ed.), International trade and the environment. Washington, DC: World Bank.
56.
Luo, Y. (1999). Entry and cooperative strategies in international business expansion. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
57.
Magretta, J. (1997). Growth through global sustainability: An interview with Monsanto’s CEO, Robert B. Shapiro. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 78-88.
58.
Mani, M., & Wheeler, D. (1998). In search of pollution havens: Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960-1995. Journal of Environment and Development, 7(3), 215-247.
59.
Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). The organization of societal sectors. In J. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 129-154). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
60.
Miles, M. P., Munilla, L. S., & McClurg, T. (1999). The impact of ISO 14000 environmental management standards on small and medium sized enterprises. Journal of Quality Management, 4(1), 111-123.
Nehrt, C. (1998). Maintainability of first mover advantages when environmental regulations differ between countries. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 77-97.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
65.
Ouchi, W. J. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129-149.
66.
Perlmutter, H. (1969). The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 4, 9-18.
67.
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environmentcompetitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 911, 97-118.
68.
Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. (1987). The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: Free Press.
69.
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., and Turner, C. (1968). The dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13, 56-105.
70.
Reilly, W. K. (1990). The green thumb of capitalism: The environmental benefits of sustainable growth. Policy Review, 54, 16-21.
71.
Rondinelli, D. A., & Vastag, G. 1996. International environmental standards and corporate policies: An integrative framework. California Management Review, 39(1), 106-122.
72.
Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. (1998a). Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 363-375.
73.
Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. (1998b). Corporate strategy and international environmental policy. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4), 819-833.
74.
Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. (2002). Six cases of corporate strategic responses to environmental regulation. European Management Journal, 18(4), 377-385.
75.
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
76.
Shaft, T. M., Ellington, R. T., Meo, M., & Sharfman, M. P. (1997). A framework for information systems in life-cycle oriented environmental management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1(2), 135-148.
77.
Shaft, T. M., Sharfman, M. P., & Swahn, M. (2002). Using inter-organizational information systems to support environmental management efforts at ASG. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(4), 95-115.
78.
Sharfman, M. P., Ellington, R. T., & Meo, M. (1997). The next step in becoming green: Lifecycle oriented environmental management. Business Horizons, 40(3), 13-22.
79.
Sharfman, M. P., Ellington, R. T., & Meo, M. (1999). Conoco and the vapor recovery project: Using innovation to preserve autonomy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3(1), 93-110.
80.
Sharfman, M. P., Wolf, G., Chase, R. A., & Tansik, D. A. (1988). The antecedents of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 601-614.
81.
Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 681-697.
82.
Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908-935.
83.
Steger, U. (1996). Managerial issues in closing the loop. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 252-268.
Walter, I. (1982). Environmentally induced industrial relocation to developing countries. In S. J. Rubin & T. R. Graham (Eds.), Environment and trade. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld & Osmun.
86.
Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
