This article analyzes, through Frederick’s (1995) naturological lens, the General Rate Case (GRC) process to regulate a private water utility in California. Golden State Water Company is the utility. The GRC concerned is Ojai, California. The authors conclude that (a) Frederick’s conceptual framework proves useful to understand antecedents of effective common-pool resource management, and (b) the GRC process encourages economizing values more than it does ecologizing ones. In essence, short-term needs overshadow long-term needs, and the economizing interests of a single member of the GRC network overshadow the ecologizing interests of diverse stakeholders. By focusing only on whether the private utility’s requests are economically justified, and not on the needs of the larger ecosystem, the GRC is unable to ensure long-term protection of either (a) the ratepayer or (b) the natural environment and community.
American States Water. (2006). Annual report to shareholders. Retrieved January 14, 2009, from http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/87/87080/ASW_AR2006.pdf
2.
Annual budget and staffing report of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates. (2006). Retrieved January 3, 2009, from ftp://ftp.cpuc.ca.gov/resources/about/060110_dra_reporttolegislature.pdf
3.
Barney, J.B. ( 1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage . Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
4.
Belknap, A. ( 1998, December 22). [Letter to OjaiCity Council re the final decision on Southern California Water (SCWC) rate increase proposal.]Ojai, CA: City Manager’s Office. City of Ojai Archives.
5.
Brown, C. ( 2007, January 24). Wine & Spirits: A scorching future; Global warming is altering the world wine map. Los AngelesTimes , p. F1+.
6.
Brown, L. ( 2001). Eco-economy: Building an economy for the earth . New York: W. W. Norton.
7.
Calton, J.M., & Kurland, N.B. ( 1996). A theory of stakeholder enabling: Giving voice to an emerging postmodern praxis of organizational discourse. In D. M. Boje, R. P. Gephart , & T. J. Thatchenkery (Eds.), Postmodern management and organization theory (pp. 154-177). London: Sage.
8.
Carle, D. ( 2004). Introduction to water in California (California Natural History Guide.)Los Angeles: University of California Press.
9.
Cassill, D. ( 2003). Skew selection: Nature favors a trickle-down distribution of resources in ants. Journal of Bioeconomics, 5(2-3), 83-96.
10.
Cassill, D., & Hill, R.P. ( 2007). A naturological approach to corporate governance: An extension of the Frederick model of corporation-community relationships . Business & Society, 46(3), 286-303.
11.
Daly, H. E., & Townsend, K. N. (Eds.). (1993). Valuing the earth: Economics, ecology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
12.
Das, T.K., & Teng, B.S. ( 1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.
13.
Division of Ratepayer Advocates, California Public Utilities Commission. (2007, May 14). Report on the results of operations of Golden State Water Company Region I: Administrative Offices Low Income Ratepayer Assistance Program for Test Year 2008 and Escalation Years 2009 and 2010. In Consolidated Proceeding Application 07-01-009 et al. San Francisco, CA.
14.
Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. ( 2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 55-73.
15.
Else, J., & Harrar, L. (Directors). (1997). Cadillac desert: Mulholland’s dream [Motion picture]. United States: Homevision.
16.
Fort, T.L. ( 1997). Naturalism and business ethics: Inevitable foes or possible allies? Business Ethics Quarterly, 7, 145-155.
17.
Fort, T.L. ( 1999). Business and naturalism: A peek at transcendence ? Business & Society, 38(2), 226-236.
18.
Frederick, W.C. ( 1995). Values, nature, and culture in the American corporation . New York: Oxford University Press .
19.
Frederick, W.C. ( 1998). Creatures, corporations, communities, chaos, complexity: A naturological view of the corporate social role. Business & Society, 37(4), 358-389.
20.
Frederick, W.C. ( 2006). Corporation be good! The story of corporate social responsibility . Indianapolis, IN: Dog Ear Publishing .
Friedman, A.L., & Miles, S. ( 2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1-21.
23.
Gray, B., & Wood, D.J. ( 1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory . Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 27(1), 3-22.
24.
Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J. ( 1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964.
25.
Hardin, G. ( 1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science , 162(3859), 1243-1248.
26.
Harnish, C.P. ( 1976). Southern California Water Company history, 1928 to 1974 . Los Angeles: Southern California Water Company.
27.
Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, L.H. ( 1999). Natural capitalism: Creating the next Industrial Revolution . New York: Little, Brown.
28.
Hill, R.P., & Cassill, D. ( 2004). The naturological view of the corporation and its social responsibility: An extension of the Frederick model of corporation - community model. Business and Society Review, 109(3), 281-296.
29.
Hundley, Jr., N. ( 2001). The great thirst: Californians and water: A history (Rev. ed.). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
30.
Jensen, M.C. ( 2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256.
31.
Jones, T. ( 1983). Transaction costs, property rights and organization culture . Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 454-467.
32.
Kelley, D. ( 2007a, December 13). Golden State’s water rate hike approved . Ojai Valley News, p. A1+.
33.
Kelley, D. ( 2007b, May 16). PUC eyes 24 percent hike: Golden State had requested 44 percent but critics still believe increase excessive. Ojai Valley News, p. A1+.
34.
Kelley, D. ( 2008, March 14). Liquid pro quo: State office appeals Golden State Water Company’s 35 percent rate hike. Ojai Valley News, p. A1+.
35.
Kurland, N.B. ( 1993). NEPA (National Environmental Protection Act): Implications for global and domestic collaboration, In D. C. Ludwig (Ed.), Business and society in a changing world order (pp. 197-224). Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.
36.
MacDonald, G. ( 2007, July 25). Are the pieces in place for a perfect drought? Insights from the past and prospects for the future. Southern California Water Dialogue. Presentation at the meeting held at the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Headquarters.
37.
Merchant, C. ( 1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
38.
Metcalf, J. ( 1998). Evolutionary economics and creative destruction (The Graz Schumpeter Lectures). London: Routledge.
39.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D. ( 1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
40.
Morris, R.R. ( 1999). Southern California Water Company. Marceline, MO: Walsworth Publishing Company.
41.
Murphy, S. ( 2007, May 16). State officials tap into Ojai’s water rate issues: Hearing draws 100 people to vent frustrations about Golden State prices, service. Ojai Valley News, p. A1+.
42.
Nash, G.D. ( 1962). The California Railroad Commission, 1876-1911 . Southern California Quarterly, 44(4), 287-305.
43.
Olin, S., Jr. ( 1968). California’s prodigal sons: Hiram Johnson and the Progressives, 1911-1917. Berkeley and Los Angeles : University of California Press.
44.
Ostrom, E. ( 1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Orts, E.W., & Strudler, A. ( 2002). The ethical and environmental limits of stakeholder theory . Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 215-234.
46.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective (Stanford Business Classics) . Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books. (Original work published 1978)
47.
Radin, T.J. ( 2004). To propagate and to prosper: A naturalistic foundation for stakeholder theory. In R. E. Freeman & P. H. Werhane (Eds.), Business, science, and ethics (Ruffin Series in Business Ethics, vol. 4, pp. 289-310). Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.
48.
Rau, N.J., & Pemberton, M. ( 2001). Mathematics for economists. Manchester , England: Manchester University Press .
49.
Reisner, M. ( 1993). Cadillac desert: The American West and its disappearing water. New York: Penguin Books.
50.
Roberts, L. ( 1998a, July 22). Are you ready for some hardball? Water company, customers prepare for Monday night showdown. Ojai Valley News, p. A1+.
51.
Roberts, L. ( 1998b, July 29). City, customers slam proposed 27-percent water rate hike. Ojai Valley News, p. A1+.
52.
Roberts, L. ( 2007, January 10). Fire destroys Ojai home. Ojai Valley News, p. A1+.
53.
Ross, L.E., & Wicks, F. ( 2006). To our shareholders. American States Water annual report . Available at: http.//www.aswater.com
54.
Rowley, T.J. ( 1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influence. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910.
55.
Rumelt, R.P. ( 1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In R. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive strategic management (pp. 556-570). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56.
Sagoff, M. ( 1988). The economy of the earth: Philosophy, law, and the environment . New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Sahagun, L. ( 2007, July 8). The long-dry Owens now teems with birds and fish . Los Angeles Times, p. B1.
58.
Sanchez, D. ( 2007, July 13). [Telephone interview with Manager, DRA, Water Division.]
59.
Schumpeter, J. ( 1962). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Perennial . (Original work published 1942)
60.
Sicaras, V.K. ( 2007, March). Every drop counts. Public Works Online. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from http://www.pwmag.com/industry-news.asp?sectionID=775&articleID=456556
61.
Snitow, A., & Kaufman, D. (Producers and Directors). (2004). Thirst [Motion picture]. United States: Bullfrog Films.
62.
Starik, M. ( 1995). Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(3), 207-217.
63.
Steck, T.L. ( 2007). Human population explosion. The encylopedia of Earth . Retrieved January 14, 2009, from http://www.eoearth.org/article/Human_population_explosion
64.
Switzer, K. ( 2007, January 5). Before the Public Utilities Commission. In the matter of the application of the Golden State Water Company (U 133 WW) for an order authorizing it to increase rates for water service by $1,432,900 or 43.95% in 2008; by -$89,500 or -1.89% in 2009; and by $33,000 or 0.71% in 2010 in its Ojai Customer Service Area. Application No. Tend 1606 A. 07-01-013 . San Dimas, CA. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from http://gswcojai.com/Documents/OJ_Application.pdf
65.
Trist, E. ( 1983). Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human Relations, 36, 269-284.
66.
Waddock, S. ( 2006). Leading corporate citizens: Vision, values, value added (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
67.
Ward, D.R. ( 2002). Water wars: Drought, flood, folly, and the politics of thirst. New York: Riverhead Books .
68.
Wicks, A.C., Berman, S.L., & Jones, T.M. ( 1999). The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications . Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 99-116.
69.
Winston, A. ( 2008, May). Green to gold. Presentation at the Eco-Advantage Salon Tour, Los Angeles, CA.
70.
Wood, D.J. ( 1992). "Dams of democracy"-Stakeholders and issues in the Hungarian-Czechoslovakia hydroelectric controversy. In S. A. Waddock & S. N. Brenner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of theInternational Association for Business and Society , Leuven, Belgium (pp. 139-148).
71.
Zetland, D. ( 2008). Conflict and cooperation within an organization: A case study of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley (Social Science Research Network No. 1129046).
